Skip to main content
PMC home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1977 May;33(5):1030–1036. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.5.1030-1036.1977

Characterization of the predominant bacteria occurring in the rumen of goats (Capra hircus).

B A Dehority, J A Grubb
PMCID: PMC170823  PMID: 879766

Abstract

A total of 44 strains of bacteria were isolated from rumen contents of the goat. Based on morphology, Gram stain, anaerobiosis, motility, and fermentation end products, they were grouped into 11 different types. For each type, all or representative strains were characterized in detail. The type, number of strains characterized over total number of strains, and identification were as follows: type 1, 6/21, atypical Butyrivibrio fibriosolvens; type 2, 6/9, atypical Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens; type 3, 3/3, genus uncertain; type 4, 2/2, genus uncertain; type 5, 3/3, Streptoccous bovis; type 6, 1/1, Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens; type 7, 1/1, Bacteroides ruminicola subsp. ruminicola; type 8, 1/1, Bacteroides ruminicola subsp. brevis; type 9, 1/1, family Peptococcaceae, genus uncertain; type 10, 1/1, genus Bacteroides; type 11, 1/1, genus Bacteroides. About 70% of the isolated strains were classified as Butyrivibrio, which is quite high compared with previous studies in cattle on similar rations. Of the 30 strains listed as type 1 and 2, the 12 studied further were characterized as atypical Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, which differed from the species description primarily by their inability to hydrolyze starch and lack of gas production.

Full text

PDF
1036

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ABOU AKKADA A. R., BLACKBURN T. H. Some observations on the nitrogen metabolism of rumen proteolytic bacteria. J Gen Microbiol. 1963 Jun;31:461–469. doi: 10.1099/00221287-31-3-461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BRYANT M. P. Bacterial species of the rumen. Bacteriol Rev. 1959 Sep;23(3):125–153. doi: 10.1128/br.23.3.125-153.1959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BRYANT M. P., ROBINSON I. M. Some nutritional characteristics of predominant culturable ruminal bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1962 Oct;84:605–614. doi: 10.1128/jb.84.4.605-614.1962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BRYANT M. P., SMALL N., BOUMA C., CHU H. Bacteroides ruminicola n. sp. and Succinimonas amylolytica; the new genus and species; species of succinic acid-producing anaerobic bacteria of the bovine rumen. J Bacteriol. 1958 Jul;76(1):15–23. doi: 10.1128/jb.76.1.15-23.1958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BRYANT M. P., SMALL N. The anaerobic monotrichous butyric acid-producing curved rod-shaped bacteria of the rumen. J Bacteriol. 1956 Jul;72(1):16–21. doi: 10.1128/jb.72.1.16-21.1956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. BRYANT M. P. The characteristics of strains of Selenomonas isolated from bovine rumen contents. J Bacteriol. 1956 Aug;72(2):162–167. doi: 10.1128/jb.72.2.162-167.1956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Becker E. R., Hsiung T. S. THE METHOD BY WHICH RUMINANTS ACQUIRE THEIR FAUNA OF INFUSORIA, AND REMARKS CONCERNING EXPERIMENTS ON THE HOST-SPECIFICITY OF THESE PROTOZOA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1929 Aug 15;15(8):684–690. doi: 10.1073/pnas.15.8.684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Caldwell D. R., Bryant M. P. Medium without rumen fluid for nonselective enumeration and isolation of rumen bacteria. Appl Microbiol. 1966 Sep;14(5):794–801. doi: 10.1128/am.14.5.794-801.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Coykendall A. L., Specht P. A. DNA base sequence homologies among strains of Streptococcus sanguis. J Gen Microbiol. 1975 Nov;91(1):92–98. doi: 10.1099/00221287-91-1-92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dehority B. A. Characterization of several bovine rumen bacteria isolated with a xylan medium. J Bacteriol. 1966 May;91(5):1724–1729. doi: 10.1128/jb.91.5.1724-1729.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dehority B. A. Pectin-fermenting bacteria isolated from the bovine rumen. J Bacteriol. 1969 Jul;99(1):189–196. doi: 10.1128/jb.99.1.189-196.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. GILL J. W., KING K. W. Nutritional characteristics of a Butyrivibrio. J Bacteriol. 1958 Jun;75(6):666–673. doi: 10.1128/jb.75.6.666-673.1958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. HAMLIN L. J., HUNGATE R. E. Culture and physiology of a starch-digesting bacterium (Bacteroides amylophilus n. sp.) from the bovine rumen. J Bacteriol. 1956 Oct;72(4):548–554. doi: 10.1128/jb.72.4.548-554.1956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. HUNGATE R. E. Microorganisms in the rumen of cattle fed a constant ration. Can J Microbiol. 1957 Mar;3(2):289–311. doi: 10.1139/m57-034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jones G. M., Larsen R. E., Javed A. H., Donefer E., Gaudreau J. M. Voluntary intake and nutrient digestibility of forages by goats and sheep. J Anim Sci. 1972 May;34(5):830–838. doi: 10.2527/jas1972.345830x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. LEE H. C., MOORE W. E. Isolation and fermentation characteristics of strains of Butyrivibrio from ruminal ingesta. J Bacteriol. 1959 Jun;77(6):741–747. doi: 10.1128/jb.77.6.741-747.1959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Latham M. J., Sharpe M. E., Sutton J. D. The microbial flora of the rumen of cows fed hay and high cereal rations and its relationship to the rumen fermentation. J Appl Bacteriol. 1971 Jun;34(2):425–434. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1971.tb02302.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Latham M. J., Storry J. E., Sharpe M. E. Effect of low-roughage diets on the microflora and lipid metabolism in the rumen. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Dec;24(6):871–877. doi: 10.1128/am.24.6.871-877.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. MARGHERITA S. S., HUNGATE R. E. SEROLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF BUTYRIVIBRIO FROM THE BOVINE RUMEN. J Bacteriol. 1963 Oct;86:855–860. doi: 10.1128/jb.86.4.855-860.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. SCOTT H. W., DEHORITY B. A. VITAMIN REQUIREMENTS OF SEVERAL CELLULOLYTIC RUMEN BACTERIA. J Bacteriol. 1965 May;89:1169–1175. doi: 10.1128/jb.89.5.1169-1175.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shane B. S., Gouws L., Kistner A. Cellulolytic bacteria occurring in the rumen of sheep conditioned to low-protein teff hay. J Gen Microbiol. 1969 Mar;55(3):445–457. doi: 10.1099/00221287-55-3-445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sharpe M. E., Latham M. J., Reiter B. The occurrence of natural antibodies to rumen bacteria. J Gen Microbiol. 1969 Jun;56(3):353–364. doi: 10.1099/00221287-56-3-353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Slyter L. L., Oltjen R. R., Kern D. L., Blank F. C. Influence of type and level of grain and diethylstilbestrol on the rumen microbial populations of steers fed all-concentrate diets. J Anim Sci. 1970 Nov;31(5):996–1002. doi: 10.2527/jas1970.315996x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Taylor M. M. Eubacterium fissicatena sp.nov. isolated from the alimentary tract of the goat. J Gen Microbiol. 1972 Aug;71(3):457–463. doi: 10.1099/00221287-71-3-457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Gylswyk N. O., Roché C. E. Characteristics of ruminococcus and cellulolytic butyrivibrio species from the rumens of sheep fed differently supplemented teff (Eragrostis tef) hay diets. J Gen Microbiol. 1970 Nov;64(1):11–17. doi: 10.1099/00221287-64-1-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES