Skip to main content
The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners logoLink to The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
. 1987 Feb;37(295):65–69.

Who cares for the patient with diabetes? Presentation and follow-up in seven Southampton practices

PJ Burrows, PJ Gray, A-L Kinmonth, DJ Payton, GA Walpole, RJ Walton, D Wilson, G Woodbine
PMCID: PMC1710691  PMID: 3668935

Abstract

A notes survey was undertaken by a group of eight general practitioners in seven Southampton practices to study the mode of presentation and follow-up of the diabetic patients on the lists of 24 doctors. The 431 known diabetic patients were classified as non-insulin-dependent (67%), insulin-dependent (20%), or, if they had commenced their insulin more than a month after the diagnosis had been made, 'insulin-treated' (13%). This classification allowed characterization of the truly insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent patients.

Non-insulin-dependent diabetics were older than insulin-dependent diabetics and had first presented at a greater age. Most patients in each treatment group presented with classical diabetic symptoms, diabetes-related infections, or recognized complications. The majority of these were diagnosed in general practice. However, over half of the asymptomatic non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients had been diagnosed by routine blood or urine testing in hospital. After 1979 fewer non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients were referred to hospital for follow-up at diagnosis than before 1975.

Most non-insulin-treated diabetics were followed up in general practice whereas most patients treated with or dependent on insulin were followed up in hospital clinics. Twenty-two per cent of all patients received diabetic care from both their general practitioner and hospital outpatient departments but 20% received no regular diabetic follow-up at all. One year after the initial study, 4% of patients were still without regular review, and 27 more patients had been identified who would have qualified for the original audit.

Full text

PDF
69

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Deckert T., Poulsen J. E., Larsen M. Prognosis of diabetics with diabetes onset before the age of thirty-one. II. Factors influencing the prognosis. Diabetologia. 1978 Jun;14(6):371–377. doi: 10.1007/BF01228131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fleming D. M., Lawrence M. S. Impact of audit on preventive measures. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Dec 17;287(6408):1852–1854. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6408.1852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gatling W., Houston A. C., Hill R. D. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus in a typical English community. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1985 Oct;19(4):248–250. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gorsuch A. N., Spencer K. M., Lister J., McNally J. M., Dean B. M., Bottazzo G. F., Cudworth A. G. Evidence for a long prediabetic period in type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Lancet. 1981 Dec 19;2(8260-61):1363–1365. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92795-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Holmes E. J. Challenges and contacts. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Apr 7;288(6423):1055–1056. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6423.1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Home P., Walford S. Diabetes care: whose responsibility? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Sep 22;289(6447):713–714. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6447.713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hull S. A. Why run a group? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Jun 16;288(6433):1811–1812. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6433.1811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kohner E. M., Barry P. J. Prevention of blindness in diabetic retinopathy. Diabetologia. 1984 Mar;26(3):173–179. doi: 10.1007/BF00252402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Miller L. V., Goldstein J. More efficient care of diabetic patients in a county-hospital setting. N Engl J Med. 1972 Jun 29;286(26):1388–1391. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197206292862605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rampen F. H. At least one centimetre for each millimetre. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Sep 29;289(6448):782–783. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6448.782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rhodes M. Enderley group. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Dec 17;287(6408):1847–1849. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6408.1847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yudkin J. S., Boucher B. J., Schopflin K. E., Harris B. T., Claff H. R., Whyte N. J., Taylor B., Mellins D. H., Wootliff A. B., Safir J. G. The quality of diabetic care in a London health district. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1980 Dec;34(4):277–280. doi: 10.1136/jech.34.4.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES