Abstract
Of the 1527 women aged 30-59 years in one general practice who were eligible for a cervical smear examination 196 (12.8%) were overdue for the test. These women were contacted randomly by post or in person to ascertain their reasons for not responding to the practice screening programme. Of 118 women contacted personally 47% had no major objection to the smear test but had a low view of its priority. A further 24% gave incorrect reasons for thinking a smear test was unnecessary while 29% had strong reasons for not wanting to attend and probably never would. Social and medical factors from the medical records were also examined and compared with those of a group of age and sex matched controls. It was found that women overdue for a smear test lived in more `socially stressed' areas and used their general practitioner much less than the controls. The theoretical upper limit for smear uptake in the practice was calculated to be around 96%. To help achieve this we need to ensure: (1) that all women understand that the test is to detect a stage before cancer; (2) that some women receive more counselling; and (3) that promotional material is directed at the families of women at risk.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Briscoe M., Woods J. O. Screening for cervical cancer in general practice. Ulster Med J. 1984;53(1):76–79. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cullum D. E., Savory J. N. Patient preferences for cervical cytology. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Jul 30;287(6388):329–330. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6388.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Day N. E. Effect of cervical cancer screening in Scandinavia. Obstet Gynecol. 1984 May;63(5):714–718. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ellman R., Chamberlain J. Improving the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 Oct;34(267):537–542. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hodes C. Cervical screening--refusal in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1972 Mar;22(116):172–175. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johannesson G., Geirsson G., Day N. The effect of mass screening in Iceland, 1965-74, on the incidence and mortality of cervical carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 1978 Apr 15;21(4):418–425. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910210404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macgregor J. E., Teper S. Mortality from carcinoma of cervix uteri in Britain. Lancet. 1978 Oct 7;2(8093):774–776. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)92658-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paterson M. E., Peel K. R., Joslin C. A. Cervical smear histories of 500 women with invasive cervical cancer in Yorkshire. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Oct 6;289(6449):896–898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6449.896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Standing P., Mercer S. Quinquennial cervical smears: every woman's right and every general practitioner's responsibility. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Oct 6;289(6449):883–886. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6449.883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walker E. M., Hare M. J., Cooper P. A retrospective review of cervical cytology in women developing invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 Nov;90(11):1087–1091. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb06449.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]