Skip to main content
PMC home page
Clinical and Experimental Immunology logoLink to Clinical and Experimental Immunology
. 1970 Jun;6(6):789–802.

The selective action of antilymphocyte serum on recirculating lymphocytes: a review of the evidence and alternatives.

E M Lance
PMCID: PMC1712818  PMID: 4394519

Full text

PDF
802

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Agnew H. D. The effect of heterologous anti-lymphocytic serum on the small lymphocyte population of rats. J Exp Med. 1968 Jul 1;128(1):111–119. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.1.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson N. F., James K., Woodruff M. F. Effect of antilymphocytic antibody and antibody fragments on skin-homograft survival and the blood-lymphocyte count in rats. Lancet. 1967 May 27;1(7500):1126–1128. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)91706-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berenbaum M. C. Time-dependent immunosuppressive effects of anti-thymocyte serum. Nature. 1967 Sep 30;215(5109):1481–1482. doi: 10.1038/2151481a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boak J. L., Fox M., Wilson R. E. Activity of lymphoid tissues from antilymphocyte-serum-treated mice. Lancet. 1967 Apr 8;1(7493):750–752. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)91366-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brent L., Courtenay T., Gowland G. Immunological reactivity of lymphoid cells after treatment with anti-lymphocytic serum. Nature. 1967 Sep 30;215(5109):1461–1464. doi: 10.1038/2151461a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CAFFREY R. W., RIEKE W. O., EVERETT N. B. Radioautographic studies of small lymphocytes in the thoracic duct of the rat. Acta Haematol. 1962;28:145–154. doi: 10.1159/000207257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. COOPER M. D., PETERSON R. D., GOOD R. A. DELINEATION OF THE THYMIC AND BURSAL LYMPHOID SYSTEMS IN THE CHICKEN. Nature. 1965 Jan 9;205:143–146. doi: 10.1038/205143a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chanana A. D., Brecher G., Cronkite E. P., Joel D., Schnappauf H. The influence of extracorporeal irradiation of the blood and lymph on skin homograft rejection. Radiat Res. 1966 Mar;27(3):330–346. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Claman H. N., Chaperon E. A., Triplett R. F. Thymus-marrow cell combinations. Synergism in antibody production. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1966 Aug-Sep;122(4):1167–1171. doi: 10.3181/00379727-122-31353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark J. G., James K., Woodruff M. F. Elimination of normal horse IgG labelled with Iodine-131 in rats receiving horse anti-rat lymphocytic IgG. Nature. 1967 Aug 19;215(5103):869–870. doi: 10.1038/215869a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Davies A. J., Leuchars E., Wallis V., Koller P. C. The mitotic response of thymus-derived cells to antigenic stimulus. Transplantation. 1966 Jul;4(4):438–451. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196607000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Denman A. M. Anti-lymphocytic antibody and autoimmune disease: a review. Clin Exp Immunol. 1969 Sep;5(3):217–249. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Denman A. M., Denman E. J., Embling P. H. Changes in the life-span of circulating small lymphocytes in mice after treatment with anti-lymphocyte globulin. Lancet. 1968 Feb 17;1(7538):321–325. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)90791-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Denman A. M., Frenkel E. P. Mode of action of anti-lymphocyte globulin. I. The distribution of rabbit anti-lymphocyte globulin injected into rats and mice. Immunology. 1968 Jan;14(1):107–113. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Denman A. M., Frenkel E. P. Mode of action of anti-lymphocyte globulin. II. Changes in the lymphoid cell population in rats treated with anti-lymphocyte globulin. Immunology. 1968 Jan;14(1):115–126. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Denman A. M., Frenkel E. P. Studies of the effect of induced immune lymphopenia. I. Enhanced effects of rabbit anti-rat lymphocyte globulin in rats tolerant to rabbit immunoglobulin G. J Immunol. 1967 Sep;99(3):498–507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. EVERETT N. B., CAFFREY R. W., RIEKE W. O. RECIRCULATION OF LYMPHOCYTES. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 Feb 28;113:887–897. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb40710.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. GOWANS J. L., KNIGHT E. J. THE ROUTE OF RE-CIRCULATION OF LYMPHOCYTES IN THE RAT. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1964 Jan 14;159:257–282. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1964.0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. GOWANS J. L. The recirculation of lymphocytes from blood to lymph in the rat. J Physiol. 1959 Apr 23;146(1):54–69. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. GRAESBECK R., NORDMAN C. T., DELACHAPELLE A. THE LEUCOCYTE-MITOGENIC EFFECT OF SERUM FROM RABBITS IMMUNIZED WITH HUMAN LEUCOCYTES. Acta Med Scand. 1964;175:SUPPL 412–412:39+. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1964.tb04631.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. GRASBECK R., NORDMAN C., DELACHAPELLE A. MITOGENIC ACTION OF ANTILEUCOCYTE IMMUNE SERUM ON PERIPHERAL LEUCOCYTES IN VITRO. Lancet. 1963 Aug 24;2(7304):385–386. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(63)93062-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. GRAY J. G., MONACO A. P., RUSSELL P. S. HETEROLOGOUS MOUSE ANTI-LYMPHOCYTE SERUM TO PROLONG SKIN HOMOGRAFTS. Surg Forum. 1964;15:142–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gabl F., Riethmüller G., Schumacher K., Zeiss I. Probleme der Transplantationsimmunologie. Z Immunitatsforsch Allerg Klin Immunol. 1967 Oct;133(5):413–455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gray J. G., Monaco A. P., Wood M. L., Russell P. S. Studies on heterologous anti-lymphocyte serum in mice. I. In vitro and in vivo properties. J Immunol. 1966 Feb;96(2):217–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Guttmann R. D., Carpenter C. B., Lindquist R. R., Merrill J. P. An immunosupressive site of action of heterologous antilymphocyte serum. Lancet. 1967 Feb 4;1(7484):248–249. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)91306-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Guttmann R. D., Carpenter C. B., Lindquist R. R., Merrill J. P. Treatment with heterologous anithymus sera: nephritis associated with modification of renal allograft rejection and the immune status of the host to the foreign protein. Transplantation. 1967 Jul;5(4 Suppl):1115–1120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hintz B., Webber M. M. Antithymic antibody localization in the mouse. Nature. 1965 Nov 20;208(5012):797–798. doi: 10.1038/208797a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hirsch M. S., Murphy F. A. Effects of anti-lymphoid sera on viral infections. Lancet. 1968 Jul 6;2(7558):37–40. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)92904-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Holt L. J., Ling N. R., Stanworth D. R. The effect of heterologous antisera and rheumatoid factor on the synthesis of DNA and protein by human peripheral lymphocytes. Immunochemistry. 1966 Sep;3(5):359–371. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(66)90174-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. JEEJEEBHOY H. F. EFFECTS OF RABBIT ANTI-RAT-LYMPHOCYTE PLASMA ON IMMUNE RESPONSE OF RATS THYMECTOMISED IN ADULT LIFE. Lancet. 1965 Jul 17;2(7403):106–107. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(65)92222-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. James K., Anderson N. F. Parallel studies on the effect of anti-lymphocytic antibody on cell mediated and humoral antibody responses in the rat. Clin Exp Immunol. 1968 Mar;3(3):227–231. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. James K. Anti-lymphocytic antibody--a review. Clin Exp Immunol. 1967 Nov;2(6):615–631. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. James K., James V. S., Pullar D. M. The effect of anti-lymphocytic IgG on unsensitized and sensitized spleen cells in vivo and in vitro. Clin Exp Immunol. 1969 Jan;4(1):93–100. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. James K., James V. S., Pullar D. M. The effect of anti-lymphocytic IgG on unsensitized and sensitized spleen cells in vivo and in vitro. Clin Exp Immunol. 1969 Jan;4(1):93–100. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. James K., Pullar D. M., James V. S. Strain variations in the primary humoral response of rats and its susceptibility to inhibition by anti-lymphocytic antibody. Nature. 1969 May 31;222(5196):886–888. doi: 10.1038/222886a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. James K. Some factors influencing the ability of anti-lymphocytic antibody to suppress humoral antibody formation. Clin Exp Immunol. 1967 Nov;2(6):685–690. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. James K. The preparation and properties of anti-lymphocytic sera. Prog Surg. 1969;7:140–217. doi: 10.1159/000386301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jeejeebhoy H. F. Immunological studies on the rat thymectomized in adult life. Immunology. 1965 Nov;9(5):417–425. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Jooste S. V., Lance E. M., Levey R. H., Medawar P. B., Ruszkiewicz M., Sharman R., Taub R. N. Notes on the preparation and assay of anti-lymphocytic serum for use in mice. Immunology. 1968 Nov;15(5):697–705. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. LIACOPOULOS P., GOODE J. H. TRANSPLANTATION TOLERANCE INDUCED IN ADULT MICE BY PROTEIN OVERLOADING OF DONORS. Science. 1964 Dec 4;146(3649):1305–1307. doi: 10.1126/science.146.3649.1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. LIACOPOULOS P. SUPPRESSION OF IMMUNOLOGICAL RESPONSES DURING THE INDUCTION OF IMMUNE PARALYSIS WITH UNRELATED ANTIGENS. Tex Rep Biol Med. 1965;23:63–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lance E. M., Batchelor J. R. Selective suppression of cellular immunity by antilymphocyte serum. Transplantation. 1968 May;6(3):490–491. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196805000-00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lance E. M., Dresser D. W. Antigenicity in mice of antilymphocyte gamma-globulin. Nature. 1967 Jul 29;215(5100):488–490. doi: 10.1038/215488a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lance E. M. Experimental observations bearing on the clinical use of ALS. Antibiot Chemother. 1969;15:310–327. doi: 10.1159/000386788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lance E. M., Ford P. J., Ruszkiewicz M. The use of subcellular fractions to raise anti-lymphocytic serum. Immunology. 1968 Oct;15(4):571–580. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lance E. M., Levey R. H., Medawar P. B., Ruszkiewicz M. Tolerance of rat skin grafts in adult mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Dec;64(4):1356–1361. doi: 10.1073/pnas.64.4.1356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lance E. M., Medawar P. B. Survival of skin heterografts under treatment with antilymphocytic serum. Lancet. 1968 Jun 1;1(7553):1174–1176. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)91868-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lance E. M., Medawar P. Quantitative studies on tissue transplantation immunity. IX. Induction of tolerance with antilymphocytic serum. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1969 Jul 22;173(1033):447–473. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1969.0071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lance E. M. Mode of action of antilymphocyte serum. Fed Proc. 1970 Jan-Feb;29(1):209–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lance E. M., Taub R. N. Segregation of lymphocyte populations through differential migration. Nature. 1969 Mar 1;221(5183):841–843. doi: 10.1038/221841a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lance E. M. The mechanism of action of anti-lymphocyte serum. Studies of antibody eluate. J Exp Med. 1969 Jul 1;130(1):49–76. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.1.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lance E. Erasure of immunological memory with anti-lymphocyte serum. Nature. 1968 Feb 10;217(5128):557–558. doi: 10.1038/217557a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Landy M., Chessin L. N. The effect of plant mitogens on humoral and cellular immune responses. Antibiot Chemother. 1969;15:199–212. doi: 10.1159/000386782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Leuchars E., Wallis V. J., Davies A. J. Mode of action for anti-lymphocyte serum. Nature. 1968 Sep 28;219(5161):1325–1328. doi: 10.1038/2191325a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Levey R. H., Medawar P. B. Further experiments on the action of antilymphocytic antiserum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Aug;58(2):470–477. doi: 10.1073/pnas.58.2.470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Levey R. H., Medawar P. B. Nature and mode of action of antilymphocytic antiserum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 Oct;56(4):1130–1137. doi: 10.1073/pnas.56.4.1130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Liacopoulos P., Merchant B., Harrell B. E. Effect of donor immunization with somatic polysaccharides on the graft-vs-host reactivity of transferred donor splenocytes. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1967 Jul;125(3):958–962. doi: 10.3181/00379727-125-32249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Martin W. J., Miller J. F. Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. IV. Site of action of antilymphocyte globulin. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):855–874. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Martin W. J., Miller J. F. Site of action of antilymphocyte globulin. Lancet. 1967 Dec 16;2(7529):1285–1287. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90395-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Metcalf W. K., Osmond D. G. A radioautographic investigation of the identity of phytohaemagglutinin responsive cells in the lymphoid tissues of the rat. Exp Cell Res. 1966 Mar;41(3):669–672. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4827(66)80118-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Miller J. F., Osoba D. Current concepts of the immunological function of the thymus. Physiol Rev. 1967 Jul;47(3):437–520. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1967.47.3.437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Miller J. F. The thymus. Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Lancet. 1967 Dec 16;2(7529):1299–1302. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90407-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Mitchison N. A. Mechanism of action of antilymphocyte serum. Fed Proc. 1970 Jan-Feb;29(1):222–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Monaco A. P., Abbott W. M., Othersen H. B., Simmons R. L., Wood M. L., Flax M. H., Russell P. S. Antiserum to lymphocytes: prolonged survival of canine renal allografts. Science. 1966 Sep 9;153(3741):1264–1267. doi: 10.1126/science.153.3741.1264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Monaco A. P., Franco D. J. The effect of heterologous antilymphocyte serum on the formation of H-2 antibody and the induction of allograft immunity. Transplant Proc. 1969 Mar;1(1):474–478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Monaco A. P., Wood M. L., Gray J. G., Russell P. S. Studies on heterologous anti-lymphocyte serum in mice. II. Effect on the immune response. J Immunol. 1966 Feb;96(2):229–238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Monaco A. P., Wood M. L., Russell P. S. Adult Thymectomy: Effect on Recovery from Immunologic Depression in Mice. Science. 1965 Jul 23;149(3682):432–435. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3682.432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Monaco A. P., Wood M. L., Russell P. S. Effect of adult thymectomy on the recovery from immunological depression induced by anti-lymphocyte serum. Surg Forum. 1965;16:209–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Monaco A. P., Wood M. L., Russell P. S. Some effects of purified heterologous antihuman lymphocyte serum in man. Transplantation. 1967 Jul;5(4 Suppl):1106–1114. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196707001-00046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Nagaya H., Sieker H. O. Allograft survival: effect of antiserums to thymus glands and lymphocytes. Science. 1965 Nov 26;150(3700):1181–1182. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3700.1181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Nagaya H., Sieker H. O. Feedback mechanisms of thymic lymphocyte production. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1967 Oct;126(1):131–135. doi: 10.3181/00379727-126-32384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Pichlmayr R., Brendel W., Zenker R. Production and effect of heterologous anti-canine lymphocyte serum. Surgery. 1967 May;61(5):774–783. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Pichlmayr R. Herstellung und Wirkung heterologer Antihundelymphocytenseren. Z Gesamte Exp Med. 1967;143(2):161–226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. REIF A. E. IMMUNE CYTOLYSIS OF MOUSE THYMIC LYMPHOCYTES. J Immunol. 1963 Oct;91:557–567. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. RUSSE H. P., CROWLE A. J. A COMPARISON OF THYMECTOMIZED AND ANTITHYMOCYTE SERUM-TREATED MICE IN THEIR DEVELOPMENT OF HYPERSENSITIVITY TO PROTEIN ANTIGENS. J Immunol. 1965 Jan;94:74–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Raff M. Theta isoantigen as a marker of thymus-derived lymphocytes in mice. Nature. 1969 Oct 25;224(5217):378–379. doi: 10.1038/224378a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Raju S., Grogan J. B., Hardy J. D. Prolonged survival of skin allografts exposed to heterologous antilymphocyte serum in vitro. J Surg Res. 1969 Jun;9(6):327–330. doi: 10.1016/0022-4804(69)90075-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Russell P. S., Monaco A. P. Heterologous antilymphocyte sera and some of their effects. Transplantation. 1967 Jul;5(4 Suppl):1086–1099. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196707001-00044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Schlesinger M., Yron I. Antigenic changes in lymph-node cells after administration of antiserum to thymus cells. Science. 1969 Jun 20;164(3886):1412–1413. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3886.1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Sell S. Antilymphocytic antibody: effects in experimental animals and problems in human use. Ann Intern Med. 1969 Jul;71(1):177–196. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-71-1-177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Sell S., Rowe D. S., Gell P. G. Studies on rabbit lymphocytes in vitro. 3. Proteins, RNA, and DNA synthesis by lymphocyte cultures after stimulation with phytohaemagglutinin, with staphylococcal filtrate, with antiallotype serum, and with heterologous antiserum to rabbit whole serum. J Exp Med. 1965 Oct 1;122(4):823–839. doi: 10.1084/jem.122.4.823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Shaffer C. F. Transfer of immunity against long surviving rat skin xenografts by antilymphocyte serum treated Syrian hamsters. Nature. 1969 Sep 27;223(5213):1375–1377. doi: 10.1038/2231375a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Taub R. N. Effects of heterologous antilymphocyte serum on lymphoid cells labeled with 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine-125-I. Fed Proc. 1970 Jan-Feb;29(1):142–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Taub R. N., Lance E. M. Histopathological effects in mice of heterologous antilymphocyte serum. J Exp Med. 1968 Dec 1;128(6):1281–1307. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.6.1281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Taylor R. B. Decay of immunological responsiveness after thymectomy in adult life. Nature. 1965 Dec 25;208(5017):1334–1335. doi: 10.1038/2081334a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Turk J. L., Willoughby D. A. An analysis of the multiplicity of the effects of antilymphocyte serum. A comparison with the action of other immunosuppressive agents in the cell-mediated immune response and non-specific inflammation. Antibiot Chemother. 1969;15:267–294. doi: 10.1159/000386786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Turk J. L., Willoughby D. A. Central and peripheral effects of anti-lymphocyte sera. Lancet. 1967 Feb 4;1(7484):249–251. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)91307-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Tyler R. W., Everett N. B., Schwarz M. R. Effect of antilymphocytic serum on rat lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1969 Jan;102(1):179–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. WOODRUFF M. F., ANDERSON N. A. EFFECT OF LYMPHOCYTE DEPLETION BY THORACIC DUCT FISTULA AND ADMINISTRATION OF ANTILYMPHOCYTIC SERUM ON THE SURVIVAL OF SKIN HOMOGRAFTS IN RATS. Nature. 1963 Nov 16;200:702–702. doi: 10.1038/200702a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. WOODRUFF M. F., ANDERSON N. F. THE EFFECT OF LYMPHOCYTE DEPLETION BY THORACIC DUCT FISTULA AND ADMINISTRATION OF ANTILYMPHOCYTIC SERUM ON THE SURVIVAL OF SKIN HOMOGRAFTS IN RATS. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 Nov 30;120:119–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb34710.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Wood M. L., Vriesendorp H. M. A comparative study of heterologous anti-mouse lymphocyte and antimouse thymocyte sera prepared by two different immunization methods. Transplantation. 1969 Jun;7(6):522–533. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196906000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Woodruff M. F., Reid B., James K. Effect of antilymphocytic antibody and antibody fragments on human lymphocytes in vitro. Nature. 1967 Aug 5;215(5101):591–594. doi: 10.1038/215591a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Experimental Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES