Skip to main content
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 1988 Oct;43(4):364–373.

Conditioning on subsets of the data: applications to ascertainment and other genetic problems.

S E Hodge 1
PMCID: PMC1715504  PMID: 3177379

Abstract

I here consider the question of when to formulate a likelihood over the whole data set, as opposed to conditioning the likelihood on subsets of the data (i.e., joint vs. conditional likelihoods). I show that when certain conditions are met, these two likelihoods are guaranteed to be equivalent, and thus that it is generally preferable to condition on subsets, since that likelihood is mathematically and computationally simpler. However, I show that when these conditions are not met, conditioning on subsets of the data is equivalent to introducing additional df into our genetic model, df that we may not have been aware of. I discuss the implications of these facts for ascertainment corrections and other genetic problems.

Full text

PDF
364

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ewens W. J., Asaba B. Estimating parameters of the family-size distribution in ascertainment sampling schemes: numerical results. Biometrics. 1984 Jun;40(2):367–374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ewens W. J., Hodge S. E., Ping F. H. The effects of a known family-size distribution on the estimation of genetic parameters. Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Apr;38(4):555–566. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ewens W. J., Shute N. C. A resolution of the ascertainment sampling problem. I. Theory. Theor Popul Biol. 1986 Dec;30(3):388–412. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(86)90042-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Greenberg D. A. The effect of proband designation on segregation analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Sep;39(3):329–339. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hodge S. E. Family-size distribution and Ewens' equivalence theorem. Am J Hum Genet. 1985 Jan;37(1):166–177. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MORTON N. E. Genetic tests under incomplete ascertainment. Am J Hum Genet. 1959 Mar;11(1):1–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shute N. C., Ewens W. J. A resolution of the ascertainment sampling problem. II. Generalizations and numerical results. Am J Hum Genet. 1988 Oct;43(4):374–386. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES