Skip to main content
PMC home page
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1990 Apr;34(4):657–659. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.4.657

Susceptibilities of Bacteroides and Fusobacterium spp. from foot rot in goats to 10 beta-lactam antibiotics.

S Piriz Duran 1, J Valle Manzano 1, R Cuenca Valera 1, S Vadillo Machota 1
PMCID: PMC171661  PMID: 2344172

Abstract

The agar dilution method was used to determine the bacteriostatic activities of 10 beta-lactam antibiotics against 132 strains belonging to the genus Bacteroides and 25 strains belonging to the genus Fusobacterium, all isolated from clinical cases of caprine foot rot. The three ureidopenicillins studied proved to be the most effective antimicrobial agents.

Full text

PDF
659

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Appelbaum P. C., Chatterton S. A. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to ten antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Sep;14(3):371–376. doi: 10.1128/aac.14.3.371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baba E., Fukata T., Arakawa A., Ikawa H., Takeda M. Antibiotic susceptibility of Fusobacterium necrophorum from bovine hepatic abscesses. Br Vet J. 1989 Mar-Apr;145(2):195–197. doi: 10.1016/0007-1935(89)90105-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barry A. L., Packer R. R. Determination of susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to cefotetan and cefoxitin by the thioglycolate disk elution method. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Nov;20(5):912–916. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.5.912-916.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bawdon R. E., Crane L. R., Palchaudhuri S. Antibiotic resistance in anaerobic bacteria: molecular biology and clinical aspects. Rev Infect Dis. 1982 Nov-Dec;4(6):1075–1095. doi: 10.1093/clinids/4.6.1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benno Y., Mitsuoka T. Susceptibility of Bacteroides from swine abscesses to 13 antibiotics. Am J Vet Res. 1984 Dec;45(12):2631–2633. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berg J. N., Loan R. W. Fusobacterium necrophorum and Bacteroides melaninogenicus as etiologic agents of foot rot in cattle. Am J Vet Res. 1975 Aug;36(08):1115–1122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown J. E., Del Bene V. E., Collins C. D. In vitro activity of N-formimidoyl thienamycin, moxalactam, and other new beta-lactam agents against Bacteroides fragilis: contribution of beta-lactamase to resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Feb;19(2):248–252. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.2.248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown W. J., Waatti P. E. Susceptibility testing of clinically isolated anaerobic bacteria by an agar dilution technique. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Apr;17(4):629–635. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.4.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cuchural G., Jacobus N., Gorbach S. L., Tally F. P. A survey of Bacteroides susceptibility in the United States. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Dec;8 (Suppl 500):27–31. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_d.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dubreuil L., Devos J., Neut C., Romond C. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria from several French hospitals to three major antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Jun;25(6):764–766. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.6.764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Egerton J. R., Parsonson I. M., Graham N. P. Parenteral chemotherapy of ovine foot-rot. Aust Vet J. 1968 Jun;44(6):275–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1968.tb04982.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Egerton J. R., Roberts D. S. Vaccination against ovine foot-rot. J Comp Pathol. 1971 Apr;81(2):179–185. doi: 10.1016/0021-9975(71)90091-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Egerton J. R. Treatment of ovine foot-rot by vaccination with the specific aetiological agent Bacteroides nodosus. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 1979;2(1):61–67. doi: 10.1016/0147-9571(79)90059-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. George W. L., Kirby B. D., Sutter V. L., Citron D. M., Finegold S. M. Gram-negative anaerobic bacilli: Their role in infection and patterns of susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. II. Little-known Fusobacterium species and miscellaneous genera. Rev Infect Dis. 1981 May-Jun;3(3):599–626. doi: 10.1093/clinids/3.3.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gradin J. L., Schmitz J. A. Susceptibility of Bacteroides nodosus to various antimicrobial agents. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1983 Aug 15;183(4):434–437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mandell W., Neu H. C. In vitro activity of CI-934, a new quinolone, compared with that of other quinolones and other antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 May;29(5):852–857. doi: 10.1128/aac.29.5.852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Owens W. E., Finegold S. M. Comparative in vitro susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria to cefmenoxime, cefotetan, and N-formimidoyl thienamycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Apr;23(4):626–629. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.4.626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Phillips I., Warren C., Taylor E., Timewell R., Eykyn S. The antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in a London teaching hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Dec;8 (Suppl 500):17–26. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_d.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Roberts D. S., Egerton J. R. The aetiology and pathogenesis of ovine foot-rot. II. The pathogenic association of Fusiformis nodosus and F. necrophorus. J Comp Pathol. 1969 Apr;79(2):217–227. doi: 10.1016/0021-9975(69)90008-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rolfe R. D., Finegold S. M. Comparative in vitro activity of new beta-lactam antibiotics against anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Nov;20(5):600–609. doi: 10.1128/aac.20.5.600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sedallian A. Sensibilité des anaérobies à huit antibiotiques. Pathol Biol (Paris) 1986 Jun;34(5 Pt 2):645–647. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Staneck J. L., Washington J. A., 2nd Antimicrobial susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria: recent clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974 Sep;6(3):311–315. doi: 10.1128/aac.6.3.311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sutter V. L., Barry A. L., Wilkins T. D., Zabransky R. J. Collaborative evaluation of a proposed reference dilution method of susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Oct;16(4):495–502. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.4.495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sutter V. L., Finegold S. M. Susceptibility of Anaerobic bacteria to carbenicillin, cefoxitin, and related drugs. J Infect Dis. 1975 Apr;131(4):417–422. doi: 10.1093/infdis/131.4.417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sutter V. L., Finegold S. M. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to 23 antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Oct;10(4):736–752. doi: 10.1128/aac.10.4.736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sutter V. L., Jones M. J., Ghoneim A. T. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of bacteria associated with periodontal disease. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Mar;23(3):483–486. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.3.483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tally F. P., Cuchural G. J., Jacobus N. V., Gorbach S. L., Aldridge K. E., Cleary T. J., Finegold S. M., Hill G. B., Iannini P. B., McCloskey R. V. Susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group in the United States in 1981. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Apr;23(4):536–540. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.4.536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES