Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1997 Jun;81(6):465–469. doi: 10.1136/bjo.81.6.465

Screening for amblyopia: a comparison of paediatric letter tests

A Simmers 1, L Gray 1, K Spowart 1
PMCID: PMC1722216  PMID: 9274410

Abstract

AIMS/BACKGROUND—The measurement of visual acuity is the most widely accepted indicator of amblyopia and is thought by some to be the only effective screening test. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the traditional single optotype Sheridan-Gardiner test (SGT) in the measurement of visual acuity and the detection of amblyopia, compared with the log based linear format Glasgow acuity cards (GAC).
METHODS—In the present study visual acuity was measured monocularly in 702 primary 1 schoolchildren using both acuity tests.
RESULTS—A significant difference was found in the mean (SD) visual acuity measured with GAC (0.9 (0.08) modified logMAR) and SGT (1.13 (0.09) modified logMAR), df=632, t=−59.08, p=0.0001. The majority of children (89.3%) achieved visual acuities better than 6/6 in either eye when using the single optotype test. If the 95% confidence limits for a significant interocular difference in acuity are used as criteria for the detection of unilateral amblyopia, GAC were found to be the most sensitive, correctly identifying 100%, while SGT identified 55% of the children with unilateral amblyopia.
CONCLUSION—The results of this study highlight several problems with both the test format and testing procedure in the present school screening system.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (110.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Atkinson J., Anker S., Evans C., Hall R., Pimm-Smith E. Visual acuity testing of young children with the Cambridge Crowding Cards at 3 and 6 m. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1988 Oct;66(5):505–508. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1988.tb04371.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailey I. L., Bullimore M. A., Raasch T. W., Taylor H. R. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991 Feb;32(2):422–432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey I. L., Lovie J. E. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1976 Nov;53(11):740–745. doi: 10.1097/00006324-197611000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FLOM M. C., WEYMOUTH F. W., KAHNEMAN D. VISUAL RESOLUTION AND CONTOUR INTERACTION. J Opt Soc Am. 1963 Sep;53:1026–1032. doi: 10.1364/josa.53.001026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fern K. D., Manny R. E. Visual acuity of the preschool child: a review. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1986 May;63(5):319–345. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198605000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fielder A. R. The management of squint. Arch Dis Child. 1989 Mar;64(3):413–418. doi: 10.1136/adc.64.3.413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Friendly D. S. Preschool visual acuity screening tests. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1978;76:383–480. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harwerth R. S., Smith E. L., 3rd, Crawford M. L., von Noorden G. K. Behavioral studies of the sensitive periods of development of visual functions in monkeys. Behav Brain Res. 1990 Dec 21;41(3):179–198. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(90)90107-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Harwerth R. S., Smith E. L., 3rd, Duncan G. C., Crawford M. L., von Noorden G. K. Multiple sensitive periods in the development of the primate visual system. Science. 1986 Apr 11;232(4747):235–238. doi: 10.1126/science.3952507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hilton A. F., Stanley J. C. Pitfalls in testing children's vision by the Sheridan Gardiner single optotype method. Br J Ophthalmol. 1972 Feb;56(2):135–139. doi: 10.1136/bjo.56.2.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hohmann A., Haase W. Development of visual line acuity in humans. Ophthalmic Res. 1982;14(2):107–112. doi: 10.1159/000265180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ingram R. M. The possibility of preventing amblyopia. Lancet. 1980 Mar 15;1(8168 Pt 1):585–587. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)91068-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lovie-Kitchin J. E. Validity and reliability of visual acuity measurements. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1988;8(4):363–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1988.tb01170.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McGraw P. V., Winn B. Glasgow Acuity Cards: a new test for the measurement of letter acuity in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1993 Oct;13(4):400–404. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1993.tb00499.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pickert S. M., Wachs H. Stimulus and communication demands of visual acuity tests. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980 Dec;57(12):875–880. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198012000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. SHERIDAN M. D. Vision screening of very young or handicapped children. Br Med J. 1960 Aug 6;2(5196):453–456. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5196.453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. STUART J. A., BURIAN H. M. A study of separation difficulty. Its relationship to visual acuity in normal and amblyopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1962 Mar;53:471–477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Williamson T. H., Andrews R., Dutton G. N., Murray G., Graham N. Assessment of an inner city visual screening programme for preschool children. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995 Dec;79(12):1068–1073. doi: 10.1136/bjo.79.12.1068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Youngson R. M. Anomaly in visual acuity testing in children. Br J Ophthalmol. 1975 Mar;59(3):168–170. doi: 10.1136/bjo.59.3.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. von Noorden G. K. A reassessment of infantile esotropia. XLIV Edward Jackson memorial lecture. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988 Jan 15;105(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(88)90113-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES