Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1989 Apr;33(4):591–592. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.4.591

Comparative antimycobacterial activities of difloxacin, temafloxacin, enoxacin, pefloxacin, reference fluoroquinolones, and a new macrolide, clarithromycin.

E A Gorzynski 1, S I Gutman 1, W Allen 1
PMCID: PMC172488  PMID: 2524998

Abstract

The activities of fluoroquinolones and a new macrolide against 30 clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis were determined in vitro by agar diffusion. In order of relative potencies against M. tuberculosis, temafloxacin (MIC for 90% of isolates [MIC90], 2.3 micrograms/ml) was at least as active as the reference quinolones ofloxacin (MIC90, 2.4 micrograms/ml) and ciprofloxacin (MIC90, 4.3 micrograms/ml). Less active were difloxacin (MIC90, 4.7 micrograms/ml), pefloxacin (MIC90, 6.7 micrograms/ml), and enoxacin (MIC90, 8.3 micrograms/ml). The macrolide clarithromycin was more potent than erythromycin but less potent than the fluoroquinolones. Our results suggest that the newer fluoroquinolones and clarithromycin should be included with ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin in pharmacokinetic studies that may lead to trials in human subjects with mycobacterial infections.

Full text

PDF
591

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Campoli-Richards D. M., Monk J. P., Price A., Benfield P., Todd P. A., Ward A. Ciprofloxacin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use. Drugs. 1988 Apr;35(4):373–447. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198835040-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Collins C. H., Uttley A. H. In-vitro susceptibility of mycobacteria to ciprofloxacin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1985 Nov;16(5):575–580. doi: 10.1093/jac/16.5.575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fenlon C. H., Cynamon M. H. Comparative in vitro activities of ciprofloxacin and other 4-quinolones against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium intracellulare. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Mar;29(3):386–388. doi: 10.1128/aac.29.3.386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fernandes P. B., Bailer R., Swanson R., Hanson C. W., McDonald E., Ramer N., Hardy D., Shipkowitz N., Bower R. R., Gade E. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of A-56268 (TE-031), a new macrolide. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Dec;30(6):865–873. doi: 10.1128/aac.30.6.865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gay J. D., DeYoung D. R., Roberts G. D. In vitro activities of norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, M. avium complex, M. chelonei, M. fortuitum, and M. kansasii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Jul;26(1):94–96. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.1.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gaya H., Chadwick M. V. In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin against mycobacteria. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jun;4(3):345–347. doi: 10.1007/BF02013668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hardy D. J., Swanson R. N., Hensey D. M., Ramer N. R., Bower R. R., Hanson C. W., Chu D. T., Fernandes P. B. Comparative antibacterial activities of temafloxacin hydrochloride (A-62254) and two reference fluoroquinolones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Nov;31(11):1768–1774. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.11.1768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hastings R. C., Gillis T. P., Krahenbuhl J. L., Franzblau S. G. Leprosy. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1988 Jul;1(3):330–348. doi: 10.1128/cmr.1.3.330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Monk J. P., Campoli-Richards D. M. Ofloxacin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use. Drugs. 1987 Apr;33(4):346–391. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198733040-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Trimble K. A., Clark R. B., Sanders W. E., Jr, Frankel J. W., Cacciatore R., Valdez H. Activity of ciprofloxacin against Mycobacteria in vitro: comparison of BACTEC and macrobroth dilution methods. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1987 May;19(5):617–622. doi: 10.1093/jac/19.5.617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tsukamura M. In vitro antimycobacterial activity of a new antibacterial substance DL-8280--differentiation between some species of mycobacteria and related organisms by the DL-8280 susceptibility test. Microbiol Immunol. 1983;27(12):1129–1132. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1983.tb02933.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Young L. S. Mycobacterium avium complex infection. J Infect Dis. 1988 May;157(5):863–867. doi: 10.1093/infdis/157.5.863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES