Skip to main content
PMC home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 1999 Aug;82(2):138–142. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.2.138

Surgery for aortic stenosis in severely symptomatic patients older than 80 years: experience in a single UK centre

T Gilbert 1, W Orr 1, A Banning 1
PMCID: PMC1729117  PMID: 10409525

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To ascertain the surgical risk and long term outcome of patients over 80 years old undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR).
DESIGN—Consecutive cases with respective case note audit and a telephone questionnaire.
SETTING—Single UK cardiothoracic surgical centre.
PATIENTS—103 (48 male) patients over 80 years old undergoing AVR. The median age was 82 years (80-95 years) and 95 of 103 patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV.
METHOD AND RESULTS—Preoperative characteristics, operative course, cost, and outcome measures were ascertained. Mean bypass time was 56 minutes and 25 patients had simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting. Overall mortality was 19 of 103. Univariate analysis of pertinent variables found that impaired renal function and peripheral vascular disease were significantly associated with early postoperative death. 10 of 12 patients requiring ventilation for more than 24 hours died. The 50% actuarial survival was 62 months. Late complications were uncommon with 92% of patients in NYHA class I or II at follow up.
CONCLUSIONS—AVR in patients over 80 years old has a significant risk. However, those patients who survive experience significant benefit with good long term prospects for general health and social independence.


Keywords: aortic valve replacement; surgical mortality; survival; age

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (93.8 KB).

Figure 1  .

Figure 1  

Open in a new tab

Temporal trend of patients more than 80 years old undergoing AVR and concomitant CABG between 1987 and 1996. 

Figure 2  .

Figure 2  

Open in a new tab

Comparison of outcome between our patients and historical controls. Data are shown for an unselected population of 80 year olds in the US3 and patients over 80 years old with symptomatic aortic stenosis8 (solid triangles). Data from our study has been superimposed to show both our total population (solid boxes) and the long term survival for patients surviving > 30 days postoperatively (open circles).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Asimakopoulos G., Edwards M. B., Taylor K. M. Aortic valve replacement in patients 80 years of age and older: survival and cause of death based on 1100 cases: collective results from the UK Heart Valve Registry. Circulation. 1997 Nov 18;96(10):3403–3408. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.10.3403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Culliford A. T., Galloway A. C., Colvin S. B., Grossi E. A., Baumann F. G., Esposito R., Ribakove G. H., Spencer F. C. Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in persons aged 80 years and over. Am J Cardiol. 1991 Jun 1;67(15):1256–1260. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90937-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Edmunds L. H., Jr, Stephenson L. W., Edie R. N., Ratcliffe M. B. Open-heart surgery in octogenarians. N Engl J Med. 1988 Jul 21;319(3):131–136. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198807213190302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fiore A. C., Naunheim K. S., Barner H. B., Pennington D. G., McBride L. R., Kaiser G. C., Willman V. L. Valve replacement in the octogenarian. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989 Jul;48(1):104–108. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(89)90189-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gardner T. J., Horneffer P. J., Manolio T. A., Pearson T. A., Gott V. L., Baumgartner W. A., Borkon A. M., Watkins L., Jr, Reitz B. A. Stroke following coronary artery bypass grafting: a ten-year study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1985 Dec;40(6):574–581. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)60352-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gehlot A., Mullany C. J., Ilstrup D., Schaff H. V., Orzulak T. A., Morris J. J., Daly R. C. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged eighty years and older: early and long-term results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 May;111(5):1026–1036. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(96)70379-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gould K. L. Why angina pectoris in aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1997 Feb 18;95(4):790–792. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.4.790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lindroos M., Kupari M., Heikkilä J., Tilvis R. Prevalence of aortic valve abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Apr;21(5):1220–1225. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90249-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Martin T. D., Craver J. M., Gott J. P., Weintraub W. S., Ramsay J., Mora C. T., Guyton R. A. Prospective, randomized trial of retrograde warm blood cardioplegia: myocardial benefit and neurologic threat. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994 Feb;57(2):298–304. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)90987-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. O'Keefe J. H., Jr, Vlietstra R. E., Bailey K. R., Holmes D. R., Jr Natural history of candidates for balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Mayo Clin Proc. 1987 Nov;62(11):986–991. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65068-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Olsson M., Granström L., Lindblom D., Rosenqvist M., Rydén L. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians with aortic stenosis: a case-control study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Dec;20(7):1512–1516. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90444-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Olsson M., Janfjäll H., Orth-Gomér K., Undén A., Rosenqvist M. Quality of life in octogenarians after valve replacement due to aortic stenosis. A prospective comparison with younger patients. Eur Heart J. 1996 Apr;17(4):583–589. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sprigings D. C., Forfar J. C. How should we manage symptomatic aortic stenosis in the patient who is 80 or older? Br Heart J. 1995 Nov;74(5):481–484. doi: 10.1136/hrt.74.5.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES