Abstract
BACKGROUND—As the definitional formula for population attributable fraction is not usually directly usable in applications, separate estimation formulas are required. However, most epidemiology textbooks limit their coverage to Levin's formula, based on the (dichotomous) distribution of the exposure of interest in the population. Few present or explain Miettinen's formula, based on the distribution of the exposure in the cases; and even fewer present the corresponding formulas for situations with more than two levels of exposure. Thus, many health researchers and public health practitioners are unaware of, or are not confident in their use of, these formulas, particularly when they involve several exposure levels, or confounding factors. METHODS/RESULTS—A heuristic approach, coupled with pictorial representations, is offered to help understand and interconnect the structures behind the Levin and Miettinen formulas. The pictorial representation shows how to deal correctly with several exposure levels, and why a commonly used approach is incorrect. Correct and incorrect approaches are also presented for situations where estimates must be aggregated over strata of a confounding factor. Keywords: attributable risk epidemiology; regression; case-control study; aetiological fraction; statistics; confounding; matching stratified data
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (284.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Benichou J., Gail M. H. Variance calculations and confidence intervals for estimates of the attributable risk based on logistic models. Biometrics. 1990 Dec;46(4):991–1003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benichou J. Methods of adjustment for estimating the attributable risk in case-control studies: a review. Stat Med. 1991 Nov;10(11):1753–1773. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780101113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruzzi P., Green S. B., Byar D. P., Brinton L. A., Schairer C. Estimating the population attributable risk for multiple risk factors using case-control data. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Nov;122(5):904–914. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cole P., MacMahon B. Attributable risk percent in case-control studies. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1971 Nov;25(4):242–244. doi: 10.1136/jech.25.4.242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drescher K., Becher H. Estimating the generalized impact fraction from case-control data. Biometrics. 1997 Sep;53(3):1170–1176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eide G. E., Gefeller O. Sequential and average attributable fractions as aids in the selection of preventive strategies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 May;48(5):645–655. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00161-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenland S., Drescher K. Maximum likelihood estimation of the attributable fraction from logistic models. Biometrics. 1993 Sep;49(3):865–872. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenland S., Robins J. M. Conceptual problems in the definition and interpretation of attributable fractions. Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Dec;128(6):1185–1197. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuritz S. J., Landis J. R. Attributable risk ratio estimation from matched-pairs case-control data. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Feb;125(2):324–328. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LEVIN M. L. The occurrence of lung cancer in man. Acta Unio Int Contra Cancrum. 1953;9(3):531–541. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miettinen O. S. Proportion of disease caused or prevented by a given exposure, trait or intervention. Am J Epidemiol. 1974 May;99(5):325–332. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morgenstern H., Bursic E. S. A method for using epidemiologic data to estimate the potential impact of an intervention on the health status of a target population. J Community Health. 1982 Summer;7(4):292–309. doi: 10.1007/BF01318961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moss M. E., Lanphear B. P., Auinger P. Association of dental caries and blood lead levels. JAMA. 1999 Jun 23;281(24):2294–2298. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.24.2294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oja H., Alho O. P., Lärä E. Model-based estimation of the excess fraction (attributable fraction): day care and middle ear infection. Stat Med. 1996 Jul 30;15(14):1519–1534. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960730)15:14<1519::AID-SIM280>3.0.CO;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Panayotou P. P., Kaskarelis D. B., Miettinen O. S., Trichopoulos D. B., Kalandidi A. K. Induced abortion and ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972 Oct 15;114(4):507–510. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(72)90211-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rockhill B., Newman B., Weinberg C. Use and misuse of population attributable fractions. Am J Public Health. 1998 Jan;88(1):15–19. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.1.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rockhill B., Weinberg C. R., Newman B. Population attributable fraction estimation for established breast cancer risk factors: considering the issues of high prevalence and unmodifiability. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 May 1;147(9):826–833. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wacholder S., Benichou J., Heineman E. F., Hartge P., Hoover R. N. Attributable risk: advantages of a broad definition of exposure. Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Aug 15;140(4):303–309. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walter S. D. Calculation of attributable risks from epidemiological data. Int J Epidemiol. 1978 Jun;7(2):175–182. doi: 10.1093/ije/7.2.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walter S. D. The estimation and interpretation of attributable risk in health research. Biometrics. 1976 Dec;32(4):829–849. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whittemore A. S. Estimating attributable risk from case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1983 Jan;117(1):76–85. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]