Skip to main content
PMC home page
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 2000 Sep;9(3):166–174. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.3.166

Reactions to the use of evidence-based performance indicators in primary care: a qualitative study

E Wilkinson 1, A McColl 1, M Exworthy 1, P Roderick 1, H Smith 1, M Moore 1, J Gabbay 1
PMCID: PMC1743530  PMID: 10980077

Abstract

Objectives—To investigate reactions to the use of evidence-based cardiovascular and stroke performance indicators within one primary care group.

Design—Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews.

Setting—Fifteen practices from a primary care group in southern England.

Participants—Fifty two primary health care professionals including 29 general practitioners, 11 practice managers, and 12 practice nurses.

Main outcome measures—Participants' perceptions towards and actions made in response to these indicators. The barriers and facilitators in using these indicators to change practice.

Results—Barriers to the use of the indicators were their data quality and their technical specifications, including definitions of diseases such as heart failure and the threshold for interventions such as blood pressure control. Nevertheless, the indicators were sufficiently credible to prompt most of those in primary care teams to reflect on some aspect of their performance. The most common response was to improve data quality through increased or improved accuracy of recording. There was a lack of a coordinated team approach to decision making. Primary care teams placed little importance on the potential for performance indicators to identify and address inequalities in services between practices. The most common barrier to change was a lack of time and resources to act upon indicators.

Conclusion—For the effective implementation of national performance indicators there are many barriers to overcome at individual, practice, and primary care group levels. Additional training and resources are required for improvements in data quality and collection, further education of all members of primary care teams, and measures to foster organisational development within practices. Unless these barriers are addressed, performance indicators could initially increase apparent variation between practices.

Key Words: performance indicators; primary care; primary care groups; training

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (157.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bero L. A., Grilli R., Grimshaw J. M., Harvey E., Oxman A. D., Thomson M. A. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. BMJ. 1998 Aug 15;317(7156):465–468. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7156.465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell N. C., Thain J., Deans H. G., Ritchie L. D., Rawles J. M., Squair J. L. Secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease: randomised trial of effect on health. BMJ. 1998 May 9;316(7142):1434–1437. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7142.1434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clancy C. M. Continuous quality improvement and primary care. Med Care. 1998 May;36(5):619–620. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199805000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davies H. T., Marshall M. N. Public disclosure of performance data: does the public get what the public wants? Lancet. 1999 May 15;353(9165):1639–1640. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)90047-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davis D. A., Thomson M. A., Oxman A. D., Haynes R. B. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995 Sep 6;274(9):700–705. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.9.700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ferlie E., Wood M., Fitzgerald L. Some limits to evidence-based medicine: a case study from elective orthopaedics. Qual Health Care. 1999 Jun;8(2):99–107. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.2.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grol R. Personal paper. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ. 1997 Aug 16;315(7105):418–421. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7105.418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mays N., Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ. 1995 Jul 8;311(6997):109–112. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6997.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McCartney P., Macdowall W., Thorogood M. A randomised controlled trial of feedback to general practitioners of their prophylactic aspirin prescribing. BMJ. 1997 Jul 5;315(7099):35–36. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7099.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McColl A., Roderick P., Gabbay J., Smith H., Moore M. Performance indicators for primary care groups: an evidence based approach. BMJ. 1998 Nov 14;317(7169):1354–1360. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7169.1354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McColl A., Roderick P., Smith H., Wilkinson E., Moore M., Exworthy M., Gabbay J. Clinical governance in primary care groups: the feasibility of deriving evidence-based performance indicators. Qual Health Care. 2000 Jun;9(2):90–97. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.2.90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Newrick D. C., Spencer J. A., Jones K. P. Collecting data in general practice: need for standardisation. BMJ. 1996 Jan 6;312(7022):33–34. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7022.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nutley S., Smith P. C. League tables for performance improvement in health care. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1998 Jan;3(1):50–57. doi: 10.1177/135581969800300111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Solberg L. I., Brekke M. L., Kottke T. E., Steel R. P. Continuous quality improvement in primary care: what's happening? Med Care. 1998 May;36(5):625–635. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199805000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Turpin R. S., Darcy L. A., Koss R., McMahill C., Meyne K., Morton D., Rodriguez J., Schmaltz S., Schyve P., Smith P. A model to assess the usefulness of performance indicators. Int J Qual Health Care. 1996 Aug;8(4):321–329. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/8.4.321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. van den Hombergh P., Grol R., van den Hoogen H. J., van den Bosch W. J. Practice visits as a tool in quality improvement: acceptance and feasibility. Qual Health Care. 1999 Sep;8(3):167–171. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.3.167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. van den Hombergh P., Grol R., van den Hoogen H. J., van den Bosch W. J. Practice visits as a tool in quality improvement: mutual visits and feedback by peers compared with visits and feedback by non-physician observers. Qual Health Care. 1999 Sep;8(3):161–166. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.3.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care : QHC are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES