Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Quality & Safety in Health Care logoLink to Quality & Safety in Health Care
. 2004 Aug;13(4):287–294. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.008540

Assessing organisational development in primary medical care using a group based assessment: the Maturity MatrixTM

G Elwyn 1, M Rhydderch 1, A Edwards 1, H Hutchings 1, M Marshall 1, P Myres 1, R Grol 1
PMCID: PMC1743864  PMID: 15289632

Abstract

Objective: To design and develop an instrument to assess the degree of organisational development achieved in primary medical care organisations.

Design: An iterative development, feasibility and validation study of an organisational assessment instrument.

Setting: Primary medical care organisations.

Participants: Primary care teams and external facilitators.

Main outcome measures: Responses to an evaluation questionnaire, qualitative process feedback, hypothesis testing, and quantitative psychometric analysis (face and construct validity) of the results of a Maturity MatrixTM assessment in 55 primary medical care organisations.

Results: Evaluations by 390 participants revealed high face validity with respect to its usefulness as a review and planning tool at the practice level. Feedback from facilitators suggests that it helped practices to prioritise their organisational development. With respect to construct validity, there was some support for the hypothesis that training and non-training status affected the degree and pattern of organisational development. The size of the organisation did not have a significant impact on the degree of organisational development.

Conclusion: This practice based facilitated group evaluation method was found to be both useful and enjoyable by the participating organisations. Psychometric validation revealed high face validity. Further developments are in place to ensure acceptability for summative work (benchmarking) and formative feedback processes (quality improvement).

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (123.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berwick D. M. A primer on leading the improvement of systems. BMJ. 1996 Mar 9;312(7031):619–622. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7031.619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buetow S. A., Wellingham J. Accreditation of general practices: challenges and lessons. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Apr;12(2):129–135. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.2.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell S. M., Braspenning J., Hutchinson A., Marshall M. N. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. BMJ. 2003 Apr 12;326(7393):816–819. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7393.816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Campbell S. M., Hann M., Hacker J., Burns C., Oliver D., Thapar A., Mead N., Safran D. G., Roland M. O. Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study. BMJ. 2001 Oct 6;323(7316):784–787. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7316.784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carroll J. S., Edmondson A. C. Leading organisational learning in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Mar;11(1):51–56. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davies H. T., Nutley S. M. Developing learning organisations in the new NHS. BMJ. 2000 Apr 8;320(7240):998–1001. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7240.998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ferlie E. B., Shortell S. M. Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. Milbank Q. 2001;79(2):281–315. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Garside P. Organisational context for quality: lessons from the fields of organisational development and change management. Qual Health Care. 1998 Dec;7 (Suppl):S8–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Huntington J., Gillam S., Rosen R. Clinical governance in primary care: organisational development for clinical governance. BMJ. 2000 Sep 16;321(7262):679–682. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Joliffe I. T., Morgan B. J. Principal component analysis and exploratory factor analysis. Stat Methods Med Res. 1992;1(1):69–95. doi: 10.1177/096228029200100105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Koeck C. Time for organisational development in healthcare organisations. Improving quality for patients means changing the organisation. BMJ. 1998 Nov 7;317(7168):1267–1268. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moss F., Garside P., Dawson S. Organisational change: the key to quality improvement. Qual Health Care. 1998 Dec;7 (Suppl):S1–S2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rhydderch M., Elwyn G., Marshall M., Grol R. Organisational change theory and the use of indicators in general practice. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Jun;13(3):213–217. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.006536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Scally G., Donaldson L. J. The NHS's 50 anniversary. Clinical governance and the drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in England. BMJ. 1998 Jul 4;317(7150):61–65. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7150.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. van den Hombergh P., Grol R., van den Hoogen H. J., van den Bosch W. J. Practice visits as a tool in quality improvement: acceptance and feasibility. Qual Health Care. 1999 Sep;8(3):167–171. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.3.167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality & safety in health care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES