Skip to main content
Sexually Transmitted Infections logoLink to Sexually Transmitted Infections
. 2001 Dec;77(6):416–418. doi: 10.1136/sti.77.6.416

Effectiveness of a mass media campaign to recruit young adults for testing of Chlamydia trachomatis by use of home obtained and mailed samples

B Andersen 1, L Ostergaard 1, J Moller 1, F Olesen 1
PMCID: PMC1744403  PMID: 11714938

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a structured information campaign aiming to recruit young adults for a Chlamydia trachomatis test by use of a non-invasive, home obtained and mailed sample.

Methods: All individuals aged 21–23 living in Aarhus county, Denmark (30 000 young adults) were offered a mailed home sampling test for C trachomatis as part of a structured 14 week information campaign on chlamydia. The kit for home sampling could be requested by leaving a message on an answering machine or through a website on the internet.

Results: During the campaign 119 of 15 000 women (0.8%) and 64 of 15 000 men (0.4%) were tested. Prevalence of infection was 8.4% (10/119) and 7.8% (5/64) in females and males, respectively. Four infections in women (4/10=40%) and three infections in men (3/5=60%) were asymptomatic.

Conclusions: The mass media campaign had only a limited effect, and there is a need for more effective outreach programmes to recruit young asymptomatic individuals for C trachomatis testing.

Key Words: mass media; screening; Chlamydia trachomatis

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (110.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersen B., Ostergaard L., Møller J. K., Olesen F. Home sampling versus conventional contact tracing for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male partners of infected women: randomised study. BMJ. 1998 Jan 31;316(7128):350–351. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7128.350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fouchard J. R., Worm A. M. Viden, holdning og adfaerd blandt Chalamydia-patienter. Perspektiver for forebyggelsen. Ugeskr Laeger. 1997 Aug 18;159(34):5085–5088. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gaydos C. A., Howell M. R., Pare B., Clark K. L., Ellis D. A., Hendrix R. M., Gaydos J. C., McKee K. T., Jr, Quinn T. C. Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female military recruits. N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 10;339(11):739–744. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199809103391105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gerbase A. C., Rowley J. T., Mertens T. E. Global epidemiology of sexually transmitted diseases. Lancet. 1998;351 (Suppl 3):2–4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)90001-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Marcus A. C., Crane L. A. A review of cervical cancer screening intervention research: implications for public health programs and future research. Prev Med. 1998 Jan-Feb;27(1):13–31. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Marrazzo J. M., White C. L., Krekeler B., Celum C. L., Lafferty W. E., Stamm W. E., Handsfield H. H. Community-based urine screening for Chlamydia trachomatis with a ligase chain reaction assay. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Nov 1;127(9):796–803. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-9-199711010-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Møller J. K., Andersen B., Olesen F., Lignell T., Ostergaard L. Impact of menstrual cycle on the diagnostic performance of LCR, TMA, and PCE for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in home obtained and mailed vaginal flush and urine samples. Sex Transm Infect. 1999 Aug;75(4):228–230. doi: 10.1136/sti.75.4.228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ostergaard L., Andersen B., Møller J. K., Olesen F. Home sampling versus conventional swab sampling for screening of Chlamydia trachomatis in women: a cluster-randomized 1-year follow-up study. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Oct 25;31(4):951–957. doi: 10.1086/318139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ostergaard L., Andersen B., Olesen F., Moller J. K. Efficacy of home sampling for screening of Chlamydia trachomatis: randomised study. BMJ. 1998 Jul 4;317(7150):26–27. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7150.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ostergaard L., Møller J. K., Andersen B., Olesen F. Diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women based on mailed samples obtained at home: multipractice comparative study. BMJ. 1996 Nov 9;313(7066):1186–1189. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7066.1186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rietmeijer C. A., Yamaguchi K. J., Ortiz C. G., Montstream S. A., LeRoux T., Ehret J. M., Judson F. N., Douglas J. M. Feasibility and yield of screening urine for Chlamydia trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction among high-risk male youth in field-based and other nonclinic settings. A new strategy for sexually transmitted disease control. Sex Transm Dis. 1997 Aug;24(7):429–435. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199708000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sexually Transmitted Infections are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES