Skip to main content
PMC home page
Sexually Transmitted Infections logoLink to Sexually Transmitted Infections
. 2003 Aug;79(4):313–317. doi: 10.1136/sti.79.4.313

Chlamydial infection: an accurate model for opportunistic screening in general practice

V Verhoeven 1, D Avonts 1, A Meheus 1, H Goossens 1, M Ieven 1, S Chapelle 1, C Lammens 1, P Van Royen 1
PMCID: PMC1744692  PMID: 12902583

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in women in general practice and to assess risk factors associated with infection.

Methods: The study was carried out in 2001–2 in different general practices in Antwerp, Belgium. Sexually active women, visiting their general practitioner for routine gynaecological care (mostly pill prescription or PAP smear), were offered opportunistic screening for chlamydia. 787 participants aged 15–40 delivered a self taken vaginal sample and filled in a questionnaire which included questions on demographic variables, urogenital symptoms, sexual history, and sexual behaviour. Samples were tested for presence of chlamydial DNA by means of a ligase chain reaction (LCR) assay, and positives were confirmed by two other amplification assays (PCR and SDA).

Results: Overall prevalence was 5.0% (95% CI: 3.5 to 6.5). Determinants of infection in logistic regression analysis were age 18–27 years, >1 partner in the past year, no use of contraceptives, frequent postcoital bleeding, having a symptomatic partner, painful micturition, and living in the inner city. The area under the ROC curve in the full model was 0.88. Selective screening based on a combination of the five first determinants detects 92.3% of infections in this sample; 37.5% of the population would need to be screened.

Conclusion: Targeted screening for chlamydial infection is possible, even in a heterogeneous group of general practice attendants. Implementing this model would require considerable communication skills from healthcare providers.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (139.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brito de Sá Armando, Gomes João Paulo, Viegas Sílvia, Ferreira Maria Arminda, Paulino Albertina, Catry Maria dos Anjos. Genital infection by Chlamydia trachomatis in Lisbon: prevalence and risk markers. Fam Pract. 2002 Aug;19(4):362–364. doi: 10.1093/fampra/19.4.362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carder C., Robinson A. J., Broughton C., Stephenson J. M., Ridgway G. L. Evaluation of self-taken samples for the presence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women using the ligase chain reaction assay. Int J STD AIDS. 1999 Dec;10(12):776–779. doi: 10.1258/0956462991913538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fenton K. A., Korovessis C., Johnson A. M., McCadden A., McManus S., Wellings K., Mercer C. H., Carder C., Copas A. J., Nanchahal K. Sexual behaviour in Britain: reported sexually transmitted infections and prevalent genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Lancet. 2001 Dec 1;358(9296):1851–1854. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06886-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Götz Hannelore, Lindback Johan, Ripa Torvald, Arneborn Malin, Ramsted Kristina, Ekdahl Karl. Is the increase in notifications of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in Sweden the result of changes in prevalence, sampling frequency or diagnostic methods? Scand J Infect Dis. 2002;34(1):28–34. doi: 10.1080/00365540110077001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Haley N., Maheux B., Rivard M., Gervais A. Sexual health risk assessment and counseling in primary care: how involved are general practitioners and obstetrician-gynecologists? Am J Public Health. 1999 Jun;89(6):899–902. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.6.899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Johnson A. M., Mercer C. H., Erens B., Copas A. J., McManus S., Wellings K., Fenton K. A., Korovessis C., Macdowall W., Nanchahal K. Sexual behaviour in Britain: partnerships, practices, and HIV risk behaviours. Lancet. 2001 Dec 1;358(9296):1835–1842. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06883-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kissin D. M., Holman S., Minkoff H. L., DeMeo L., McCormack W. M., DeHovitz J. A. Epidemiology and natural history of ligase chain reaction detected chlamydial and gonococcal infections. Sex Transm Infect. 2002 Jun;78(3):208–209. doi: 10.1136/sti.78.3.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kretzschmar M., Welte R., van den Hoek A., Postma M. J. Comparative model-based analysis of screening programs for Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Jan 1;153(1):90–101. doi: 10.1093/aje/153.1.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Matthews P., Fletcher J. Sexually transmitted infections in primary care: a need for education. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Jan;51(462):52–56. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nelson H. D., Helfand M. Screening for chlamydial infection. Am J Prev Med. 2001 Apr;20(3 Suppl):95–107. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00253-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Oakeshott P., Kerry S., Hay S., Hay P. Opportunistic screening for chlamydial infection at time of cervical smear testing in general practice: prevalence study. BMJ. 1998 Jan 31;316(7128):351–352. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7128.351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ostergaard L., Møller J. K., Andersen B., Olesen F. Diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women based on mailed samples obtained at home: multipractice comparative study. BMJ. 1996 Nov 9;313(7066):1186–1189. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7066.1186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pimenta J., Catchpole M., Gray M., Hopwood J., Randall S. Evidence based health policy report. Screening for genital chlamydial infection. BMJ. 2000 Sep 9;321(7261):629–631. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7261.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Postma M. J., Welte R., van den Hoek J. A. R., Morré S. A. Comparing cost effectiveness of screening women for Chlamydia trachomatis in systematic and opportunistic approaches. Sex Transm Infect. 2002 Feb;78(1):73–74. doi: 10.1136/sti.78.1.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Scholes D., Stergachis A., Heidrich F. E., Andrilla H., Holmes K. K., Stamm W. E. Prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease by screening for cervical chlamydial infection. N Engl J Med. 1996 May 23;334(21):1362–1366. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199605233342103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Simms I., Hughes G., Catchpole M. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis. New methods are needed to assess the burden of illness from chlamydia. BMJ. 1998 Sep 5;317(7159):680–681. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7159.680a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stephenson J., Carder C., Copas A., Robinson A., Ridgway G., Haines A. Home screening for chlamydial genital infection: is it acceptable to young men and women? Sex Transm Infect. 2000 Feb;76(1):25–27. doi: 10.1136/sti.76.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Temple-Smith M. J., Mulvey G., Keogh L. Attitudes to taking a sexual history in general practice in Victoria, Australia. Sex Transm Infect. 1999 Feb;75(1):41–44. doi: 10.1136/sti.75.1.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Van Dyck E., Ieven M., Pattyn S., Van Damme L., Laga M. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by enzyme immunoassay, culture, and three nucleic acid amplification tests. J Clin Microbiol. 2001 May;39(5):1751–1756. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1751-1756.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Vuylsteke B., Vandenbruaene M., Vandenbalcke P., Van Dyck E., Laga M. Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence and sexual behaviour among female adolescents in Belgium. Sex Transm Infect. 1999 Jun;75(3):152–155. doi: 10.1136/sti.75.3.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wiesenfeld H. C., Lowry D. L., Heine R. P., Krohn M. A., Bittner H., Kellinger K., Shultz M., Sweet R. L. Self-collection of vaginal swabs for the detection of Chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis: opportunity to encourage sexually transmitted disease testing among adolescents. Sex Transm Dis. 2001 Jun;28(6):321–325. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200106000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wilson J. S., Honey E., Templeton A., Paavonen J., Mårdh P. A., Stray-Pedersen B., EU Biomed Concerted Action Group A systematic review of the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis among European women. Hum Reprod Update. 2002 Jul-Aug;8(4):385–394. doi: 10.1093/humupd/8.4.385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. van Valkengoed I. G., Boeke A. J., Morré S. A., van den Brule A. J., Meijer C. J., Devillé W., Bouter L. M. Disappointing performance of literature-derived selective screening criteria for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in an inner-city population. Sex Transm Dis. 2000 Oct;27(9):504–507. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200010000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. van Valkengoed I. G., Morré S. A., van den Brule A. J., Meijer C. J., Devillé W., Bouter L. M., Boeke A. J. Low diagnostic accuracy of selective screening criteria for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections in the general population. Sex Transm Infect. 2000 Oct;76(5):375–380. doi: 10.1136/sti.76.5.375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sexually Transmitted Infections are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES