Skip to main content
PMC home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2004 Dec;13(4):415–421. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.006460

Which smokers use the smoking cessation Quitline in Hong Kong, and how effective is the Quitline?

A Abdullah 1, T Lam 1, S Chan 1, A Hedley 1
PMCID: PMC1747959  PMID: 15564628

Abstract

Objective: To describe the characteristics of the Chinese subjects who utilised the first telephone smoking cessation service in Hong Kong, and to evaluate its effectiveness.

Methods: The Quitline provided Hong Kong residents with free telephone smoking cessation services which was publicised through a press conference, media reports, pamphlets, and posters at public and private hospitals and clinics. Callers who completed an initial interview from 13 December 2000 to 31 May 2002 were included. Smokers were interviewed using a structured record sheet and provided with stage matched counselling. A follow up interview was carried out after six months. Analysis was conducted by intention-to-treat.

Results: Of the 1120 callers who completed initial assessments, 1047 were current smokers and 872 consented to follow ups. Compared to the general smoking population, the Quitline attracted more of those who were female, younger, single, unemployed, higher educated, smoking more than 20 cigarettes per day, and those with quitting experience. At six months, 12% (95% confidence interval 10% to 15%) of the participants reported that they had not smoked a cigarette for the past seven days. A stepwise logistic regression model showed that the use of nicotine replacement therapy at the present attempt to quit, having made one or more serious attempts to quit in the past, perceiving less difficulties in quitting, and smoking the first cigarette at age 15 years or above were significant predictors of quitting.

Conclusion: This first Quitline in Asia appears to be acceptable to Chinese smokers, with quit rate comparable to those of better funded Quitlines in the West. A low cost Quitline is a promising model for smoking cessation services in the East.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (119.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Balanda K. P., Lowe J. B., O'Connor-Fleming M. L. Comparison of two self-help smoking cessation booklets. Tob Control. 1999 Spring;8(1):57–61. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.1.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cohen J. E. Universities and tobacco money. BMJ. 2001 Jul 7;323(7303):1–2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7303.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davis S. W., Cummings K. M., Rimer B. K., Sciandra R., Stone J. C. The impact of tailored self-help smoking cessation guides on young mothers. Health Educ Q. 1992 Winter;19(4):495–504. doi: 10.1177/109019819201900412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fagerstrom K. O., Schneider N. G. Measuring nicotine dependence: a review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. J Behav Med. 1989 Apr;12(2):159–182. doi: 10.1007/BF00846549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gourlay S. G., Benowitz N. L., Forbes A., McNeil J. J. Determinants of plasma concentrations of nicotine and cotinine during cigarette smoking and transdermal nicotine treatment. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;51(5):407–414. doi: 10.1007/s002280050222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Heatherton T. F., Kozlowski L. T., Frecker R. C., Fagerström K. O. The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991 Sep;86(9):1119–1127. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hughes J. R., Goldstein M. G., Hurt R. D., Shiffman S. Recent advances in the pharmacotherapy of smoking. JAMA. 1999 Jan 6;281(1):72–76. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.1.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jaén C. R., Cummings K. M., Zielezny M., O'Shea R. Patterns and predictors of smoking cessation among users of a telephone hotline. Public Health Rep. 1993 Nov-Dec;108(6):772–778. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lichtenstein E., Glasgow R. E., Lando H. A., Ossip-Klein D. J., Boles S. M. Telephone counseling for smoking cessation: rationales and meta-analytic review of evidence. Health Educ Res. 1996 Jun;11(2):243–257. doi: 10.1093/her/11.2.243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Orleans C. T., Boyd N. R., Bingler R., Sutton C., Fairclough D., Heller D., McClatchey M., Ward J. A., Graves C., Fleisher L. A self-help intervention for African American smokers: tailoring cancer information service counseling for a special population. Prev Med. 1998 Sep-Oct;27(5 Pt 2):S61–S70. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ossip-Klein D. J., Giovino G. A., Megahed N., Black P. M., Emont S. L., Stiggins J., Shulman E., Moore L. Effects of a smoker's hotline: results of a 10-county self-help trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Apr;59(2):325–332. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.59.2.325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Owen L. Impact of a telephone helpline for smokers who called during a mass media campaign. Tob Control. 2000 Jun;9(2):148–154. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.2.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Platt S., Tannahill A., Watson J., Fraser E. Effectiveness of antismoking telephone helpline: follow up survey. BMJ. 1997 May 10;314(7091):1371–1375. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7091.1371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Prochaska J. O., Goldstein M. G. Process of smoking cessation. Implications for clinicians. Clin Chest Med. 1991 Dec;12(4):727–735. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Prout Marianne N., Martinez O., Ballas J., Geller A. C., Lash T. L., Brooks D., Heeren T. Who uses the Smoker's Quitline in Massachusetts? Tob Control. 2002 Jun;11 (Suppl 2):ii74–ii75. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_2.ii74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Riemsma Robert Paul, Pattenden Jill, Bridle Christopher, Sowden Amanda J., Mather Lisa, Watt Ian S., Walker Anne. Systematic review of the effectiveness of stage based interventions to promote smoking cessation. BMJ. 2003 May 31;326(7400):1175–1177. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Thompson B., Kinne S., Lewis F. M., Woolridge J. A. Randomized telephone smoking-intervention trial initially directed at blue-collar workers. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1993;(14):105–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Velicer W. F., Prochaska J. O., Rossi J. S., Snow M. G. Assessing outcome in smoking cessation studies. Psychol Bull. 1992 Jan;111(1):23–41. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wakefield M., Borland R. Saved by the bell: the role of telephone helpline services in the context of mass-media anti-smoking campaigns. Tob Control. 2000 Jun;9(2):117–119. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.2.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhu S. H., Anderson C. M., Johnson C. E., Tedeschi G., Roeseler A. A centralised telephone service for tobacco cessation: the California experience. Tob Control. 2000;9 (Suppl 2):II48–II55. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.suppl_2.ii48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhu Shu-Hong, Anderson Christopher M., Tedeschi Gary J., Rosbrook Bradley, Johnson Cynthia E., Byrd Michael, Gutiérrez-Terrell Elsa. Evidence of real-world effectiveness of a telephone quitline for smokers. N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 3;347(14):1087–1093. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa020660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Web-only Table]
tobcont_13_4_415__index.html (1.2KB, html)
tobcont_13_4_415__1.pdf (95.2KB, pdf)

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES