Skip to main content
PMC home page
Tobacco Control logoLink to Tobacco Control
. 2005 Aug;14(4):227–235. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.007377

Japanese spousal smoking study revisited: how a tobacco industry funded paper reached erroneous conclusions

E Yano 1
PMCID: PMC1748079  PMID: 16046682

Abstract

Objectives: To provide a participant's account of the development of a paper commissioned by the tobacco industry examining the reliability of self reported smoking status; to redress the distorted report of this Japanese spousal smoking study which evaluated the reliability and validity of self reported smoking status, and estimated confounding by diet and lifestyle factors.

Design: Repeated interviews on smoking status and its verification by environmental and biological markers for environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure.

Setting: Urban wives in Osaka City and Sizuoka City, Japan

Participants: Semi-random sampling of 200 wives in each city. From the Osaka subjects, 100 non-smoking wives were selected for the validity study.

Main outcome measures: Kappa coefficient for reliability of self reported smoking status. Correlation coefficients between environmental nicotine concentration, cotinine in saliva and urine, and self reported smoking status.

Results: The κ coefficient for the repeated interview was high suggesting sufficient reliability of the response. The proportion of self reported current smokers misclassified as non-smokers was equivalent to the misclassified self reported non-smokers. Ambient concentration of nicotine and personal exposure to nicotine correlated with each other and also with salivary cotinine and self reported ETS exposure but not with urinary cotinine/creatinine ratio (CCR). There was no major difference in diet and lifestyle related to husband's smoking status.

Conclusion: Self reported smoking status by Japanese wives shows high reliability. It also shows high validity when verified by both nicotine exposure and salivary cotinine, but not by CCR. A previous report questioning the credibility of self reported smoking status, based on questionable CCR, could thus be of dubious validity. In addition, possible dietary and lifestyle confounding factors associated with smoking husbands were not demonstrable, a finding not reported previously. Using all the data from this project changes the conclusion of the previous published report. In addition to the distortion of scientific findings by a tobacco industry affiliated researcher, anti-smoking campaigners made attempts to intimidate and suppress scientific activities. These distortions of science should be counteracted.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (125.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adlkofer F., Scherer G., Conze C., Angerer J., Lehnert G. Significance of exposure to benzene and other toxic compounds through environmental tobacco smoke. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1990;116(6):591–598. doi: 10.1007/BF01637079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benowitz N. L. Biomarkers of environmental tobacco smoke exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 May;107 (Suppl 2):349–355. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107s2349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benowitz N. L. Cotinine as a biomarker of environmental tobacco smoke exposure. Epidemiol Rev. 1996;18(2):188–204. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a017925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bjercke R. J., Cook G., Rychlik N., Gjika H. B., Van Vunakis H., Langone J. J. Stereospecific monoclonal antibodies to nicotine and cotinine and their use in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. J Immunol Methods. 1986 Jun 24;90(2):203–213. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(86)90077-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Friedlos F., Court S., Ford M., Denny W. A., Springer C. Gene-directed enzyme prodrug therapy: quantitative bystander cytotoxicity and DNA damage induced by CB1954 in cells expressing bacterial nitroreductase. Gene Ther. 1998 Jan;5(1):105–112. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3300569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Garfinkel L. Time trends in lung cancer mortality among nonsmokers and a note on passive smoking. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1981 Jun;66(6):1061–1066. doi: 10.1093/jnci/66.6.1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hackshaw A. K. Lung cancer and passive smoking. Stat Methods Med Res. 1998 Jun;7(2):119–136. doi: 10.1177/096228029800700203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hirayama T. Cancer mortality in nonsmoking women with smoking husbands based on a large-scale cohort study in Japan. Prev Med. 1984 Nov;13(6):680–690. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(84)80017-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hirayama T. Non-smoking wives of heavy smokers have a higher risk of lung cancer: a study from Japan. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981 Jan 17;282(6259):183–185. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6259.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hirayama T. Non-smoking wives of heavy smokers have a higher risk of lung cancer: a study from Japan. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981 Jan 17;282(6259):183–185. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6259.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hong Mi-Kyung, Bero Lisa A. How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke. BMJ. 2002 Dec 14;325(7377):1413–1416. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7377.1413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee P. N. "Marriage to a smoker" may not be a valid marker of exposure in studies relating environmental tobacco smoke to risk of lung cancer in Japanese non-smoking women. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1995;67(5):287–294. doi: 10.1007/BF00385642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee P. N. "Marriage to a smoker" may not be a valid marker of exposure in studies relating environmental tobacco smoke to risk of lung cancer in Japanese non-smoking women. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1995;67(5):287–294. doi: 10.1007/BF00385642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee P. N. "Marriage to a smoker" may not be a valid marker of exposure in studies relating environmental tobacco smoke to risk of lung cancer in Japanese non-smoking women. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1995;67(5):287–294. doi: 10.1007/BF00385642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee P. N., Forey B. A. Misclassification of smoking habits as a source of bias in the study of environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer. Stat Med. 1996 Mar 30;15(6):581–605. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960330)15:6<581::AID-SIM182>3.0.CO;2-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee P. N. Lung cancer and passive smoking: association of an artefact due to misclassification of smoking habits? Toxicol Lett. 1987 Jan;35(1):157–162. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(87)90102-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee P. Passive smoking and lung cancer. Strength of evidence on passive smoking and lung cancer is overstated. BMJ. 1998 Aug 1;317(7154):346–348. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lehnert G., Garfinkel L., Hirayama T., Schmähl D., Uberla K., Wynder E. L., Lee P. Roundtable discussion: symposium: medical perspectives on passive smoking. Prev Med. 1984 Nov;13(6):730–746. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(84)80022-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mantel N. Epidemiologic investigations. Care in conduct, care in analysis, and care in reporting. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1983;105(2):113–116. doi: 10.1007/BF00406920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Matsukura S., Taminato T., Kitano N., Seino Y., Hamada H., Uchihashi M., Nakajima H., Hirata Y. Effects of environmental tobacco smoke on urinary cotinine excretion in nonsmokers. Evidence for passive smoking. N Engl J Med. 1984 Sep 27;311(13):828–832. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198409273111305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ozasa K., Higashi A., Yamasaki M., Hayashi K., Watanabe Y. Validity of self-reported passive smoking evaluated by comparison with smokers in the same household. J Epidemiol. 1997 Dec;7(4):205–209. doi: 10.2188/jea.7.205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pirkle J. L., Flegal K. M., Bernert J. T., Brody D. J., Etzel R. A., Maurer K. R. Exposure of the US population to environmental tobacco smoke: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988 to 1991. JAMA. 1996 Apr 24;275(16):1233–1240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pirkle J. L., Flegal K. M., Bernert J. T., Brody D. J., Etzel R. A., Maurer K. R. Exposure of the US population to environmental tobacco smoke: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988 to 1991. JAMA. 1996 Apr 24;275(16):1233–1240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Riboli E., Haley N. J., Trédaniel J., Saracci R., Preston-Martin S., Trichopoulos D. Misclassification of smoking status among women in relation to exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Eur Respir J. 1995 Feb;8(2):285–290. doi: 10.1183/09031936.95.08020285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Riboli E., Preston-Martin S., Saracci R., Haley N. J., Trichopoulos D., Becher H., Burch J. D., Fontham E. T., Gao Y. T., Jindal S. K. Exposure of nonsmoking women to environmental tobacco smoke: a 10-country collaborative study. Cancer Causes Control. 1990 Nov;1(3):243–252. doi: 10.1007/BF00117476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Thompson S. G., Barlow R. D., Wald N. J., Van Vunakis H. How should urinary cotinine concentrations be adjusted for urinary creatinine concentration? Clin Chim Acta. 1990 Mar 15;187(3):289–295. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(90)90114-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wells A. J., English P. B., Posner S. F., Wagenknecht L. E., Perez-Stable E. J. Misclassification rates for current smokers misclassified as nonsmokers. Am J Public Health. 1998 Oct;88(10):1503–1509. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.10.1503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wu A. H. Exposure misclassification bias in studies of environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Dec;107 (Suppl 6):873–877. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107s6873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Web-only table]
tobcont_14_4_227__index.html (1.1KB, html)
tobcont_14_4_227__1.pdf (35.7KB, pdf)

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES