Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 2003 Jan;62(1):20–26. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.1.20

Development of the ASQoL: a quality of life instrument specific to ankylosing spondylitis

L Doward 1, A Spoorenberg 1, S Cook 1, D Whalley 1, P Helliwell 1, L Kay 1, S McKenna 1, A Tennant 1, D van der Heijde 1, M Chamberlain 1
PMCID: PMC1754293  PMID: 12480664

Abstract

Background: Although disease-specific health status measures are available for ankylosing spondylitis (AS), no instrument exists for assessing quality of life (QoL) in the condition.

Objective: To produce an AS-specific QoL measure that would be relevant and acceptable to respondents, valid, and reliable.

Methods: The ASQoL employs the needs-based model of QoL and was developed in parallel in the UK and the Netherlands (NL). Content was derived from interviews with patients in each country. Face and content validity were assessed through patient field test interviews (UK and NL). A postal survey in the UK produced a more efficient version of the ASQoL, which was tested for scaling properties, reliability, internal consistency, and validity in a further postal survey in each country.

Results: A 41 item questionnaire was derived from interview transcripts. Field testing interviews confirmed acceptability. Rasch analysis of data from the first survey (n=121) produced a 26 item questionnaire. Rasch analysis of data from the second survey (UK: n=164; NL: n=154) showed some item misfit, but showed that items formed a hierarchical order and were stable over time. Problematic items were removed giving an 18 item scale. Both language versions had excellent internal consistency (α=0.89–0.91), test-retest reliability (rs=0.92 UK and rs=0.91 NL), and validity.

Conclusions: The ASQoL provides a valuable tool for assessing the impact of interventions for AS and for evaluating models of service delivery. It is well accepted by patients, taking about four minutes to complete, and has excellent scaling and psychometric properties.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (171.5 KB).

Figure 1 .

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Stages in production of the ASQoL

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abbott C. A., Helliwell P. S., Chamberlain M. A. Functional assessment in ankylosing spondylitis: evaluation of a new self-administered questionnaire and correlation with anthropometric variables. Br J Rheumatol. 1994 Nov;33(11):1060–1066. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/33.11.1060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Calin A., Garrett S., Whitelock H., Kennedy L. G., O'Hea J., Mallorie P., Jenkinson T. A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):2281–2285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chamberlain M. A. Socioeconomic effects of ankylosing spondylitis in females: a comparison of 25 female with 25 male subjects. Int Rehabil Med. 1983;5(3):149–153. doi: 10.3109/09638288309166954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Creemers M. C., Van 't Hof M. A., Franssen M. J., Van de Putte L. B., Gribnau F. W., Van Riel P. L. A Dutch version of the functional index for ankylosing spondylitis: development and validation in a long-term study. Br J Rheumatol. 1994 Sep;33(9):842–846. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/33.9.842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Daltroy L. H., Larson M. G., Roberts N. W., Liang M. H. A modification of the Health Assessment Questionnaire for the spondyloarthropathies. J Rheumatol. 1990 Jul;17(7):946–950. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dougados M., Gueguen A., Nakache J. P., Nguyen M., Mery C., Amor B. Evaluation of a functional index and an articular index in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 1988 Feb;15(2):302–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Doward L. C., McKenna S. P., Kohlmann T., Niero M., Patrick D., Spencer B., Thorsen H. The international development of the RGHQoL: a quality of life measure for recurrent genital herpes. Qual Life Res. 1998 Feb;7(2):143–153. doi: 10.1023/a:1008857426633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Guillemin F., Challier B., Urlacher F., Vançon G., Pourel J. Quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis: validation of the ankylosing spondylitis Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2, a modified Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Questionnaire. Arthritis Care Res. 1999 Jun;12(3):157–162. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199906)12:3<157::aid-art2>3.0.co;2-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hunt S. M., McKenna S. P., McEwen J., Williams J., Papp E. The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med A. 1981 May;15(3 Pt 1):221–229. doi: 10.1016/0271-7123(81)90005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hunt S. M., McKenna S. P. The QLDS: a scale for the measurement of quality of life in depression. Health Policy. 1992 Oct;22(3):307–319. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(92)90004-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McKenna S. P., Doward L. C., Alonso J., Kohlmann T., Niero M., Prieto L., Wíren L. The QoL-AGHDA: an instrument for the assessment of quality of life in adults with growth hormone deficiency. Qual Life Res. 1999 Jun;8(4):373–383. doi: 10.1023/a:1008987922774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McKenna S. P., Hunt S. M. A new measure of quality of life in depression: testing the reliability and construct validity of the QLDS. Health Policy. 1992 Oct;22(3):321–330. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(92)90005-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Smith R. M., Schumacker R. E., Bush M. J. Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model. J Outcome Meas. 1998;2(1):66–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wagner T. H., Patrick D. L., McKenna S. P., Froese P. S. Cross-cultural development of a quality of life measure for men with erection difficulties. Qual Life Res. 1996 Aug;5(4):443–449. doi: 10.1007/BF00449919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Whalley D., McKenna S. P., de Jong Z., van der Heijde D. Quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1997 Aug;36(8):884–888. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/36.8.884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. de Jong Z., van der Heijde D., McKenna S. P., Whalley D. The reliability and construct validity of the RAQoL: a rheumatoid arthritis-specific quality of life instrument. Br J Rheumatol. 1997 Aug;36(8):878–883. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/36.8.878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. van der Linden S., Valkenburg H. A., Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1984 Apr;27(4):361–368. doi: 10.1002/art.1780270401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Web-only Supplemental Material]
annrheumd_62_1_20__index.html (1.4KB, html)
annrheumd_62_1_20__2.pdf (106.1KB, pdf)
annrheumd_62_1_20__1.pdf (75.6KB, pdf)

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES