Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the sensitivity of the ligase chain reaction (LCR) assay for Chlamydia trachomatis in vaginal swabs from women who were positive in cervical samples and/or urines. SUBJECTS: 413 women attending the genitourinary medicine clinic, St. Mary's Hospital, Paddington. METHODS: The LCR assay was used to test vaginal swabs from 46 women who were C trachomatis positive at one or both of the other sites by direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) staining, by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA), or by the LCR assay. RESULTS: The LCR assay of vaginal swabs had the following sensitivity values using confirmed positive results: 93% (41/44) compared with DFA staining of cervical deposits, 93% (41/44) compared with the LCR assay of cervical samples, 93% (28/30) compared with an EIA for cervical samples, 91% (39/43) compared with DFA staining of urine deposits, and 93% (39/42) compared with the LCR assay of urine. Four women had vaginal swab samples negative by the LCR assay; one was positive only in the urine and two had cervical samples containing a small number of chlamydial elementary bodies. CONCLUSION: Testing vaginal swabs by the LCR assay is a sensitive method of detecting chlamydial infection; the results suggest that this procedure could be used as an alternative to examining urines in a screening programme for chlamydial infection in the community.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (49.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Chernesky M. A., Jang D., Lee H., Burczak J. D., Hu H., Sellors J., Tomazic-Allen S. J., Mahony J. B. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in men and women by testing first-void urine by ligase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Nov;32(11):2682–2685. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.11.2682-2685.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hay P. E., Thomas B. J., Horner P. J., MacLeod E., Renton A. M., Taylor-Robinson D. Chlamydia trachomatis in women: the more you look, the more you find. Genitourin Med. 1994 Apr;70(2):97–100. doi: 10.1136/sti.70.2.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jensen I. P., Thorsen P., Møller B. R. Sensitivity of ligase chain reaction assay of urine from pregnant women for Chlamydia trachomatis. Lancet. 1997 Feb 1;349(9048):329–330. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)62829-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ostergaard L., Møller J. K., Andersen B., Olesen F. Diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women based on mailed samples obtained at home: multipractice comparative study. BMJ. 1996 Nov 9;313(7066):1186–1189. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7066.1186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schachter J., Moncada J., Whidden R., Shaw H., Bolan G., Burczak J. D., Lee H. H. Noninvasive tests for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection: application of ligase chain reaction to first-catch urine specimens of women. J Infect Dis. 1995 Nov;172(5):1411–1414. doi: 10.1093/infdis/172.5.1411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sellors J. W., Mahony J. B., Jang D., Pickard L., Goldsmith C. H., Gafni A., Chernesky M. A. Comparison of cervical, urethral, and urine specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women. J Infect Dis. 1991 Jul;164(1):205–208. doi: 10.1093/infdis/164.1.205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]