Skip to main content
PMC home page
Sexually Transmitted Infections logoLink to Sexually Transmitted Infections
. 1998 Dec;74(6):435–438. doi: 10.1136/sti.74.6.435

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in vaginal specimens from female commercial sex workers using a new improved enzyme immunoassay

M Tanaka, H Nakayama, H Yoshida, K Takahashi, T Nagafuji, T Hagiwara, J Kumazawa
PMCID: PMC1758151  PMID: 10195054

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of a new improved enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in vaginal swab and endocervical swab specimens from female commercial sex workers, in comparison with a conventional EIA test and a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. METHODS: A high risk group of 163 female commercial sex workers who visited a sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic in order to undergo screening for major STDs, including chlamydial infection, were enrolled. A total of four swab specimens, including two vaginal and two endocervical specimens, were collected from each woman by a clinician. To identify C trachomatis, a new improved EIA kit (IDEIA PCE), a conventional EIA kit (IDEIA), and PCR assay (Amplicor) were used. Discrepancies in the results were resolved using supplementary PCR assay. A female patient was considered to be infected with C trachomatis if the IDEIA PCE test and PCR test for both sample sites (endocervical and vaginal) gave positive results. Following resolution of these discrepancies, relative sensitivity and specificity, confidence intervals, and predictive values for each type of specimen by each assay were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 163 women tested, 35 (21.5%) were shown to be infected with C trachomatis. The relative sensitivities in vaginal swab specimens were 88.8%, 68.6%, and 91.4% using IDEIA PCE, IDEIA, and PCR, respectively. The relative specificities in vaginal swab specimens were 99.2%, 99.2%, and 100%, respectively. The relative sensitivities in endocervical swab specimens were 85.7%, 77.1%, and 91.4% with IDEIA PCE, IDEIA, and PCR, respectively. The relative specificities in endocervical swab specimens were all 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained in this study suggest that the sensitivity and specificity of IDEIA PCE test on vaginal swab and endocervical swab specimens were similar to those of PCR assay on the two types of specimen. It is concluded that IDEIA PCE test on vaginal swab specimens is an acceptable, sensitive, and less invasive approach for the detection of C trachomatis in commercial sex workers with a high prevalence of C trachomatis infection. 




Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (76.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chernesky M. A., Jang D., Lee H., Burczak J. D., Hu H., Sellors J., Tomazic-Allen S. J., Mahony J. B. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in men and women by testing first-void urine by ligase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Nov;32(11):2682–2685. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.11.2682-2685.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chernesky M. A., Lee H., Schachter J., Burczak J. D., Stamm W. E., McCormack W. M., Quinn T. C. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis urethral infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic men by testing first-void urine in a ligase chain reaction assay. J Infect Dis. 1994 Nov;170(5):1308–1311. doi: 10.1093/infdis/170.5.1308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dean D., Ferrero D., McCarthy M. Comparison of performance and cost-effectiveness of direct fluorescent-antibody, ligase chain reaction, and PCR assays for verification of chlamydial enzyme immunoassay results for populations with a low to moderate prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jan;36(1):94–99. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.1.94-99.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Deguchi T., Yasuda M., Uno M., Tada K., Iwata H., Komeda H., Maeda S., Latila V., Saito I., Kawada Y. Comparison among performances of a ligase chain reaction-based assay and two enzyme immunoassays in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from men with nongonococcal urethritis. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Jul;34(7):1708–1710. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.7.1708-1710.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hadgu A. The discrepancy in discrepant analysis. Lancet. 1996 Aug 31;348(9027):592–593. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05122-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hook E. W., 3rd, Smith K., Mullen C., Stephens J., Rinehardt L., Pate M. S., Lee H. H. Diagnosis of genitourinary Chlamydia trachomatis infections by using the ligase chain reaction on patient-obtained vaginal swabs. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Aug;35(8):2133–2135. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.8.2133-2135.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lee H. H., Chernesky M. A., Schachter J., Burczak J. D., Andrews W. W., Muldoon S., Leckie G., Stamm W. E. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urine. Lancet. 1995 Jan 28;345(8944):213–216. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90221-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Loeffelholz M. J., Lewinski C. A., Silver S. R., Purohit A. P., Herman S. A., Buonagurio D. A., Dragon E. A. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Nov;30(11):2847–2851. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.11.2847-2851.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Notomi T., Okadome A., Ariyoshi A., Nagayama A. [Basic evaluation of Chlamydia antigen detection by EIA using a dual amplification enhanced immunoassay method]. Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1998 Jan;72(1):45–53. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.72.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ostergaard L., Møller J. K., Andersen B., Olesen F. Diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women based on mailed samples obtained at home: multipractice comparative study. BMJ. 1996 Nov 9;313(7066):1186–1189. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7066.1186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Schachter J., Stamm W. E., Quinn T. C., Andrews W. W., Burczak J. D., Lee H. H. Ligase chain reaction to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Oct;32(10):2540–2543. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.10.2540-2543.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stary A., Najim B., Lee H. H. Vulval swabs as alternative specimens for ligase chain reaction detection of genital chlamydial infection in women. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Apr;35(4):836–838. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.4.836-838.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tanaka M., Nakayama H., Sakumoto M., Matsumoto T., Akazawa K., Kumazawa J. Trends in sexually transmitted diseases and condom use patterns among commercial sex workers in Fukuoka City, Japan 1990-93. Genitourin Med. 1996 Oct;72(5):358–361. doi: 10.1136/sti.72.5.358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Witkin S. S., Inglis S. R., Polaneczky M. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis by polymerase chain reaction in introital specimens from pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul;175(1):165–167. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70268-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sexually Transmitted Infections are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES