Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of the menstrual cycle on the diagnostic performance of various assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in home obtained and mailed vaginal flush and urine specimens. METHODS: A ligase chain reaction assay (LCR; Abbott Laboratories), a transcription mediated amplification assay (TMA; Gen-Probe), and an enzyme amplified immunoassay (PCE; Dako Diagnostics) were evaluated for their validity in detecting C trachomatis in vaginal flush, first void urine, and midstream urine specimens obtained by female high school students at home and mailed directly to the diagnostic laboratory. RESULTS: C trachomatis was detected in 45 of 889 females (5.1%). The vaginal flush material was positive by TMA and LCR in 84% and 82% of the chlamydia positive females, respectively. First void urine was positive by TMA in 73% and by LCR in 49% of the cases. Midstream urine was positive by TMA and LCR in 69% and 42% of the females, respectively. On a pool of first void and midstream urine, PCE detected 49% of the chlamydia positive females. The overall prevalence of C trachomatis increased with increasing time after the last menstrual bleeding. In urine samples, but not vaginal flush specimens, obtained 3 weeks after the last menstrual bleeding, the sensitivities of TMA, LCR, and PCE decreased markedly suggesting that inhibitors to the assays are excreted in the urine but not in vaginal secretions at this time. CONCLUSION: Vaginal flush samples are superior to urines for detection of chlamydia infections in females. In screening of young asymptomatic females, samples should be obtained in the latter part of the menstrual cycle.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (58.7 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Andersen B., Ostergaard L., Møller J. K., Olesen F. Home sampling versus conventional contact tracing for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male partners of infected women: randomised study. BMJ. 1998 Jan 31;316(7128):350–351. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7128.350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berg E. S., Anestad G., Moi H., Størvold G., Skaug K. False-negative results of a ligase chain reaction assay to detect Chlamydia trachomatis due to inhibitors in urine. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997 Oct;16(10):727–731. doi: 10.1007/BF01709252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chernesky M. A., Jang D., Lee H., Burczak J. D., Hu H., Sellors J., Tomazic-Allen S. J., Mahony J. B. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in men and women by testing first-void urine by ligase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Nov;32(11):2682–2685. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.11.2682-2685.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hadgu A. The discrepancy in discrepant analysis. Lancet. 1996 Aug 31;348(9027):592–593. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05122-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hook E. W., 3rd, Smith K., Mullen C., Stephens J., Rinehardt L., Pate M. S., Lee H. H. Diagnosis of genitourinary Chlamydia trachomatis infections by using the ligase chain reaction on patient-obtained vaginal swabs. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Aug;35(8):2133–2135. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.8.2133-2135.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horner P. J., Crowley T., Leece J., Hughes A., Smith G. D., Caul E. O. Chlamydia trachomatis detection and the menstrual cycle. Lancet. 1998 Jan 31;351(9099):341–342. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)78335-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jensen I. P., Thorsen P., Møller B. R. Sensitivity of ligase chain reaction assay of urine from pregnant women for Chlamydia trachomatis. Lancet. 1997 Feb 1;349(9048):329–330. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)62829-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mouton J. W., Verkooyen R., van der Meijden W. I., van Rijsoort-Vos T. H., Goessens W. H., Kluytmans J. A., Deelen S. D., Luijendijk A., Verbrugh H. A. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in male and female urine specimens by using the amplified Chlamydia trachomatis test. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Jun;35(6):1369–1372. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.6.1369-1372.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ostergaard L., Andersen B., Olesen F., Moller J. K. Efficacy of home sampling for screening of Chlamydia trachomatis: randomised study. BMJ. 1998 Jul 4;317(7150):26–27. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7150.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ostergaard L., Møller J. K., Andersen B., Olesen F. Diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women based on mailed samples obtained at home: multipractice comparative study. BMJ. 1996 Nov 9;313(7066):1186–1189. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7066.1186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peeling R. W., Toye B., Jessamine P., Gemmill I. Pooling of urine specimens for PCR testing: a cost saving strategy for Chlamydia trachomatis control programmes. Sex Transm Infect. 1998 Feb;74(1):66–70. doi: 10.1136/sti.74.1.66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]