Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1986 Feb;29(2):201–208. doi: 10.1128/aac.29.2.201

In vivo evaluation of A-56619 (difloxacin) and A-56620: new aryl-fluoroquinolones.

P B Fernandes, D T Chu, R R Bower, K P Jarvis, N R Ramer, N Shipkowitz
PMCID: PMC176377  PMID: 3521473

Abstract

A-56619 and A-56620 are two new aryl-fluoroquinolones which are as potent as or more potent than norfloxacin when administered orally and subcutaneously in mouse protection tests against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. A-56619 and A-56620 were more potent than norfloxacin when administered orally against Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Serratia marcescens, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. A-56620 was as potent or two- to threefold more potent than norfloxacin when administered subcutaneously against members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infection with Salmonella typhimurium was more effectively treated with A-56619 (50% effective dose [ED50], 1.4 mg/kg per day) than with norfloxacin (ED50, 62.8 mg/kg per day). E. coli or Pseudomonas pyelonephritis in mice was more effectively treated with A-56619 or A-56620 than with norfloxacin. After oral treatment, the ED50s of A-56619 and A-56620 were less than 12.5 mg/kg per day against E. coli and 62.9 and 38 mg/kg per day against P. aeruginosa pyelonephritis, respectively. Norfloxacin was ineffective at 200 mg/kg per day against E. coli or P. aeruginosa pyelonephritis. A-56619 and A-56620 were also more potent than norfloxacin in treatment of mixed bacterial pyelonephritis caused by E. coli and Streptococcus faecalis. A-56619 was at least 30 times more potent than norfloxacin and A-56620 was 4 to 11 times more potent than norfloxacin when administered against Klebsiella pneumonia in mice. A-56619 and A-56620 were at least 2 to 10 times more potent than norfloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus infections in immunosuppressed mice. A-56619 was equally potent in all in vivo tests when administered orally or subcutaneously, whereas A-56620 was similar to norfloxacin in being more potent when administered subcutaneously. The peak serum levels after subcutaneous and oral administration of A-56619 and A-56620 were higher than that of norfloxacin. The serum hal-lives of A-56619 and A-56620 after subcutaneous and oral administration were longer than the serum half-life of norfloxacin.

Full text

PDF
208

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chandrasekar P. H., Smith B. R., LeFrock J. L., Carr B. Enterococcal superinfection and colonization with aztreonam therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Aug;26(2):280–282. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.2.280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gadebusch H. H., Shungu D. L., Weinberg E., Chung S. K. Comparison of the antibacterial activity of norfloxacin (MK 0366, AM 715), a new organic acid, with that of other orally absorbed chemotherapeutic agents. Infection. 1982 Jan;10(1):41–44. doi: 10.1007/BF01640837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gilfillan E. C., Pelak B. A., Bland J. A., Malatesta P. F., Gadebusch H. H. Pharmacokinetic studies of norfloxacin in laboratory animals. Chemotherapy. 1984;30(5):288–296. doi: 10.1159/000238283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ito A., Hirai K., Inoue M., Koga H., Suzue S., Irikura T., Mitsuhashi S. In vitro antibacterial activity of AM-715, a new nalidixic acid analog. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Feb;17(2):103–108. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.2.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Moellering R. C., Jr Enterococcal infections in patients treated with moxalactam. Rev Infect Dis. 1982 Nov-Dec;4 (Suppl):S708–S711. doi: 10.1093/clinids/4.supplement_3.s708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Montay G., Goueffon Y., Roquet F. Absorption, distribution, metabolic fate, and elimination of pefloxacin mesylate in mice, rats, dogs, monkeys, and humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Apr;25(4):463–472. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.4.463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stamm J. M., Hanson C. W., Chu D. T., Bailer R., Vojtko C., Fernandes P. B. In vitro evaluation of A-56619 (difloxacin) and A-56620: new aryl-fluoroquinolones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Feb;29(2):193–200. doi: 10.1128/aac.29.2.193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES