Abstract
The in vitro activity of penicillin, cefoxitin, moxalactam, ticarcillin, clindamycin, chloramphenicol, and metronidazole against 590 anaerobic isolates collected from five Canadian hospitals during 1984 was determined by an agar dilution technique. Cefoxitin, clindamycin, chloramphenicol, and metronidazole were very active against most of the isolates. No major regional differences in the susceptibility patterns were observed.
Full text
PDFSelected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Acar J. F., Goldstein F. W., Kitzis M. D., Eyquem M. T. Resistance pattern of anaerobic bacteria isolated in a general hospital during a two-year period. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Dec;8 (Suppl 500):9–16. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_d.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Appelbaum P. C., Chatterton S. A. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to ten antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Sep;14(3):371–376. doi: 10.1128/aac.14.3.371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bartlett J. G. Anti-anaerobic antibacterial agents. Lancet. 1982 Aug 28;2(8296):478–481. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)90503-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bawdon R. E., Rozmiej E., Palchaudhuri S., Krakowiak J. Variability in the susceptibility pattern of Bacteroides fragilis in four Detroit area hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Nov;16(5):664–666. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.5.664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bourgault A. M., Harkness J. L., Rosenblatt J. E. Clinical usefulness of susceptibility testing of anaerobes. Arch Intern Med. 1978 Dec;138(12):1825–1827. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chow A. W., Patten V., Guze L. B. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to metronidazole: relative resistance of non-spore-forming gram-positive baccilli. J Infect Dis. 1975 Feb;131(2):182–185. doi: 10.1093/infdis/131.2.182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cuchural G. J., Jr, Tally F. P., Jacobus N. V., Gorbach S. L., Aldridge K., Cleary T., Finegold S. M., Hill G., Iannini P., O'Keefe J. P. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of 1,292 isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group in the United States: comparison of 1981 with 1982. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Aug;26(2):145–148. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.2.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dubois J., Pechère J. C., Turgeon P. Activity of ten antimicrobial agents against anaerobic bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1978 Jul;4(4):329–334. doi: 10.1093/jac/4.4.329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dubreuil L., Devos J., Neut C., Romond C. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria from several French hospitals to three major antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Jun;25(6):764–766. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.6.764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edson R. S., Rosenblatt J. E., Lee D. T., McVey E. A., 3rd Recent experience with antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria: increasing resistance to penicillin. Mayo Clin Proc. 1982 Dec;57(12):737–741. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hansen S. L. Variation in susceptibility patterns of species within the Bacteroides fragilis group. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Apr;17(4):686–690. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.4.686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jenkins S. G., Birk R. J., Zabransky R. J. Differences in susceptibilities of species of the Bacteroides fragilis group to several beta-lactam antibiotics: indole production as an indicator of resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Oct;22(4):628–634. doi: 10.1128/aac.22.4.628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lacroix J. M., Lamothe F., Malouin F. Role of Bacteroides bivius beta-lactamase in beta-lactam susceptibility. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Nov;26(5):694–698. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.5.694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marrie T. J., Haldane E. V., Swantee C. A., Kerr E. A. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to nine antimicrobial agents and demonstration of decreased susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens to penicillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Jan;19(1):51–55. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray P. R., Rosenblatt J. E. Penicillin resistance and penicillinase production in clinical isolates of Bacteroides melaninogenicus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Apr;11(4):605–608. doi: 10.1128/aac.11.4.605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phillips I., Warren C., Taylor E., Timewell R., Eykyn S. The antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in a London teaching hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Dec;8 (Suppl 500):17–26. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_d.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rolfe R. D., Finegold S. M. Comparative in vitro activity of new beta-lactam antibiotics against anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Nov;20(5):600–609. doi: 10.1128/aac.20.5.600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Snydman D. R., Tally F. P., Knuppel R., Landrigan J., Gorbach S. L., Bartlett J. G. Bacteroides bivius and Bacteroides disiens in obstetrical patients: clinical findings and antimicrobial susceptibilities. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1980 Jul;6(4):519–525. doi: 10.1093/jac/6.4.519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutter V. L., Finegold S. M. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to 23 antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Oct;10(4):736–752. doi: 10.1128/aac.10.4.736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tally F. P., Cuchural G. J., Jr, Jacobus N. V., Gorbach S. L., Aldridge K., Cleary T., Finegold S. M., Hill G., Iannini P., O'Keefe J. P. Nationwide study of the susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Nov;28(5):675–677. doi: 10.1128/aac.28.5.675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilkins T. D., Thiel T. Resistance of some species of Clostridium to clindamycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Jan;3(1):136–137. doi: 10.1128/aac.3.1.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]