Skip to main content
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 2001 Sep;10(Suppl 1):i39–i43. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100039..

How do patients' treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians?

A Montgomery, T Fahey
PMCID: PMC1765739  PMID: 11533437

Abstract

The shared model of medical decision making has been proposed as the preferred method of determining patients' treatment. However, agreement may be more difficult to achieve if patients' and clinicians' preferences are polarised. The aim of this paper is to explore how closely patients and clinicians agree in their preferences for different treatment options. Only studies that made quantifiable estimates of preferences were included. There is some evidence that patients and health professionals often do not agree on treatment preference in the areas of cardiovascular disease, cancer, obstetrics and gynaecology, and acute respiratory illness. However, the magnitude and direction of these differences vary and may depend on the condition of interest. Most of the research to date is cross sectional; longitudinal research is required to investigate whether preferences change over time and are related to treatment choice, adherence to medication if taken, and health outcomes.

Key Words: patient preference; treatment choice; decision making; patient-caregiver communication

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (90.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beaulieu M. D., Hudon E., Roberge D., Pineault R., Forté D., Légaré J. Practice guidelines for clinical prevention: do patients, physicians and experts share common ground? CMAJ. 1999 Sep 7;161(5):519–523. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beisecker A. E., Helmig L., Graham D., Moore W. P. Attitudes of oncologists, oncology nurses, and patients from a women's clinic regarding medical decision making for older and younger breast cancer patients. Gerontologist. 1994 Aug;34(4):505–512. doi: 10.1093/geront/34.4.505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyd N. F., Sutherland H. J., Heasman K. Z., Tritchler D. L., Cummings B. J. Whose utilities for decision analysis? Med Decis Making. 1990 Jan-Mar;10(1):58–67. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9001000109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Charles C., Whelan T., Gafni A. What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):780–782. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997 Apr;2(2):112–121. doi: 10.1177/135581969700200209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Elwyn G., Edwards A., Gwyn R., Grol R. Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars. BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):753–756. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fahey T. Antibiotics for respiratory tract symptoms in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Dec;48(437):1815–1816. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Frewer L. J., Salter B., Lambert N. Understanding patients' preferences for treatment: the need for innovative methodologies. Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 (Suppl 1):i50–i54. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100050... [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Geary M., Wilshin J., Persaud M., Hindmarsh P. C., Rodeck C. H. Do doctors have an increased rate of Caesarean section? Lancet. 1998 Apr 18;351(9110):1177–1177. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)79120-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hamm R. M., Hicks R. J., Bemben D. A. Antibiotics and respiratory infections: are patients more satisfied when expectations are met? J Fam Pract. 1996 Jul;43(1):56–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hlatky M. A. Patient preferences and clinical guidelines. JAMA. 1995 Apr 19;273(15):1219–1220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Macfarlane J., Holmes W., Macfarlane R., Britten N. Influence of patients' expectations on antibiotic management of acute lower respiratory tract illness in general practice: questionnaire study. BMJ. 1997 Nov 8;315(7117):1211–1214. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7117.1211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McAlister F. A., O'Connor A. M., Wells G., Grover S. A., Laupacis A. When should hypertension be treated? The different perspectives of Canadian family physicians and patients. CMAJ. 2000 Aug 22;163(4):403–408. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nease R. F., Jr, Kneeland T., O'Connor G. T., Sumner W., Lumpkins C., Shaw L., Pryor D., Sox H. C. Variation in patient utilities for outcomes of the management of chronic stable angina. Implications for clinical practice guidelines. Ischemic Heart Disease Patient Outcomes Research Team. JAMA. 1995 Apr 19;273(15):1185–1190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Protheroe J., Fahey T., Montgomery A. A., Peters T. J. The impact of patients' preferences on the treatment of atrial fibrillation: observational study of patient based decision analysis. BMJ. 2000 May 20;320(7246):1380–1384. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7246.1380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ramsay L. E., Williams B., Johnston G. D., MacGregor G. A., Poston L., Potter J. F., Poulter N. R., Russell G. British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 1999: summary. BMJ. 1999 Sep 4;319(7210):630–635. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7210.630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Robinson A., Thomson R. Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools. Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 (Suppl 1):i34–i38. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100034... [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ryan M., Bate A., Eastmond C. J., Ludbrook A. Use of discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences. Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 (Suppl 1):i55–i60. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100055... [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Slevin M. L., Stubbs L., Plant H. J., Wilson P., Gregory W. M., Armes P. J., Downer S. M. Attitudes to chemotherapy: comparing views of patients with cancer with those of doctors, nurses, and general public. BMJ. 1990 Jun 2;300(6737):1458–1460. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6737.1458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Steel N. Thresholds for taking antihypertensive drugs in different professional and lay groups: questionnaire survey. BMJ. 2000 May 27;320(7247):1446–1447. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7247.1446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care : QHC are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES