Skip to main content
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 2003 Nov;62(Suppl 2):ii10–ii12. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.suppl_2.ii10

Imaging: do erosions heal?

D van der Heijde, R Landewe
PMCID: PMC1766744  PMID: 14532139

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (129.7 KB).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Probability plot of change scores of radiographic damage of two drugs. The x axis shows the cumulative probability and the y axis the actual values. Every single observation is plotted in the curve. The horizontal lines represent a possible binomial cut off point (change of 0 and change of -7).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The entire group in reality shows no progression, but there is random measurement error (films scored with the time sequence concealed). The mean change score is 0 (95% CI -1.06 to 1.06).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Forty per cent of the patients show true repair and no measurement error is present. The mean change score is -1.62 (95% CI -2.30 to -1.04).

graphic file with name ar13169.f4.jpg

Figure 4. Forty per cent of the cases showing true repair combined with measurement error, by randomly matching the putative true repair scores with putative error scores. The mean change score is -1.7 (95% CI -2.9 to -0.52).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Landewé R. B. M., Boers M., van der Heijde D. M. F. M. How to interpret radiological progression in randomized clinical trials? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003 Jan;42(1):2–5. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lassere M., Boers M., van der Heijde D., Boonen A., Edmonds J., Saudan A., Verhoeven A. C. Smallest detectable difference in radiological progression. J Rheumatol. 1999 Mar;26(3):731–739. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Menninger H., Meixner C., Söndgen W. Progression and repair in radiographs of hands and forefeet in early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1995 Jun;22(6):1048–1054. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Moeser P. J., Baer A. N. Healing of joint erosions in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Jan;33(1):151–152. doi: 10.1002/art.1780330121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rau R., Wassenberg S., Herborn G., Perschel W. T., Freitag G. Identification of radiologic healing phenomena in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2001 Dec;28(12):2608–2615. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sharp John T., Van Der Heijde Désirée, Boers Maarten, Boonen Annelies, Bruynesteyn Karin, Emery Paul, Genant Harry K., Herborn Gertraud, Jurik Anne, Lassere Marissa. Repair of erosions in rheumatoid arthritis does occur. Results from 2 studies by the OMERACT Subcommittee on Healing of Erosions. J Rheumatol. 2003 May;30(5):1102–1107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sokka T., Hannonen P. Healing of erosions in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000 Aug;59(8):647–649. doi: 10.1136/ard.59.8.647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Van Der Heijde Désirée, Sharp John T., Rau Rolf, Strand Vibeke, Subcommittee on Healing of Erosions of the OMERACT Imaging Committee OMERACT workshop: repair of structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2003 May;30(5):1108–1109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. van der Heijde Désirée, Simon Lee, Smolen Josef, Strand Vibeke, Sharp John, Boers Maarten, Breedveld Ferdinand, Weisman Michael, Weinblatt Michael, Rau Rolf. How to report radiographic data in randomized clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis: guidelines from a roundtable discussion. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Apr 15;47(2):215–218. doi: 10.1002/art.10181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES