Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1997 Sep;179(18):5720–5727. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.18.5720-5727.1997

Chemosensory and photosensory perception in purple photosynthetic bacteria utilize common signal transduction components.

Z Y Jiang 1, H Gest 1, C E Bauer 1
PMCID: PMC179459  PMID: 9294427

Abstract

The chemotaxis gene cluster from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodospirillum centenum contains five open reading frames (ORFs) that have significant sequence homology to chemotaxis genes from other bacteria. To elucidate the functions of each ORF, we have made various mutations in the gene cluster and analyzed their phenotypic defects. Deletion of the entire che operon (delta che), as well as nonpolar disruptions of cheAY, cheW, and cheR, resulted in a smooth-swimming phenotype, whereas disruption of cheB resulted in a locked tumbly phenotype. Each of these mutants was defective in chemotactic response. Interestingly, disruption of cheY resulted in a slight increase in the frequency of tumbling/reversal with no obvious defects in chemotactic response. In contrast to observations with Escherichia coli and several other bacteria, we found that all of the che mutant cells were capable of differentiating into hyperflagellated swarmer cells when plated on a solid agar surface. When viewed microscopically, the smooth-swimming che mutants exhibited active surface motility but were unable to respond to a step-down in light intensity. Both positive and negative phototactic responses were abolished in all che mutants, including the cheY mutant. These results indicate that eubacterial photosensory perception is mediated by light-generated signals that are transmitted through the chemotaxis signal transduction cascade.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (386.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adler J. A method for measuring chemotaxis and use of the method to determine optimum conditions for chemotaxis by Escherichia coli. J Gen Microbiol. 1973 Jan;74(1):77–91. doi: 10.1099/00221287-74-1-77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Belas R., Erskine D., Flaherty D. Proteus mirabilis mutants defective in swarmer cell differentiation and multicellular behavior. J Bacteriol. 1991 Oct;173(19):6279–6288. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.19.6279-6288.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berg H. C., Brown D. A. Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking. Nature. 1972 Oct 27;239(5374):500–504. doi: 10.1038/239500a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bischoff D. S., Ordal G. W. Bacillus subtilis chemotaxis: a deviation from the Escherichia coli paradigm. Mol Microbiol. 1992 Jan;6(1):23–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb00833.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blackhart B. D., Zusman D. R. Analysis of the products of the Myxococcus xanthus frz genes. J Bacteriol. 1986 May;166(2):673–678. doi: 10.1128/jb.166.2.673-678.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ferrando-May E., Krah M., Marwan W., Oesterhelt D. The methyl-accepting transducer protein HtrI is functionally associated with the photoreceptor sensory rhodopsin I in the archaeon Halobacterium salinarium. EMBO J. 1993 Aug;12(8):2999–3005. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05968.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harshey R. M. Bees aren't the only ones: swarming in gram-negative bacteria. Mol Microbiol. 1994 Aug;13(3):389–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00433.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harshey R. M., Matsuyama T. Dimorphic transition in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: surface-induced differentiation into hyperflagellate swarmer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Aug 30;91(18):8631–8635. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.18.8631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Häder D. P. Photosensory behavior in procaryotes. Microbiol Rev. 1987 Mar;51(1):1–21. doi: 10.1128/mr.51.1.1-21.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jiang Z. Y., Bauer C. E. Analysis of a chemotaxis operon from Rhodospirillum centenum. J Bacteriol. 1997 Sep;179(18):5712–5719. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.18.5712-5719.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Krah M., Marwan W., Verméglio A., Oesterhelt D. Phototaxis of Halobacterium salinarium requires a signalling complex of sensory rhodopsin I and its methyl-accepting transducer HtrI. EMBO J. 1994 May 1;13(9):2150–2155. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06491.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kuo S. C., Koshland D. E., Jr Roles of cheY and cheZ gene products in controlling flagellar rotation in bacterial chemotaxis of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1987 Mar;169(3):1307–1314. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.3.1307-1314.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McCarter L., Hilmen M., Silverman M. Flagellar dynamometer controls swarmer cell differentiation of V. parahaemolyticus. Cell. 1988 Jul 29;54(3):345–351. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90197-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McCarter L., Silverman M. Surface-induced swarmer cell differentiation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Mol Microbiol. 1990 Jul;4(7):1057–1062. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1990.tb00678.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McCleary W. R., Zusman D. R. FrzE of Myxococcus xanthus is homologous to both CheA and CheY of Salmonella typhimurium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Aug;87(15):5898–5902. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.15.5898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. O'Rear J., Alberti L., Harshey R. M. Mutations that impair swarming motility in Serratia marcescens 274 include but are not limited to those affecting chemotaxis or flagellar function. J Bacteriol. 1992 Oct;174(19):6125–6137. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.19.6125-6137.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Palleroni N. J. Chamber for bacterial chemotaxis experiments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Nov;32(5):729–730. doi: 10.1128/aem.32.5.729-730.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Parkinson J. S. Complementation analysis and deletion mapping of Escherichia coli mutants defective in chemotaxis. J Bacteriol. 1978 Jul;135(1):45–53. doi: 10.1128/jb.135.1.45-53.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Parkinson J. S., Kofoid E. C. Communication modules in bacterial signaling proteins. Annu Rev Genet. 1992;26:71–112. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.26.120192.000443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Parkinson J. S. cheA, cheB, and cheC genes of Escherichia coli and their role in chemotaxis. J Bacteriol. 1976 May;126(2):758–770. doi: 10.1128/jb.126.2.758-770.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Penfold R. J., Pemberton J. M. An improved suicide vector for construction of chromosomal insertion mutations in bacteria. Gene. 1992 Sep 1;118(1):145–146. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90263-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Prentki P., Krisch H. M. In vitro insertional mutagenesis with a selectable DNA fragment. Gene. 1984 Sep;29(3):303–313. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90059-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ragatz L., Jiang Z. Y., Bauer C. E., Gest H. Macroscopic phototactic behavior of the purple photosynthetic bacterium Rhodospirillum centenum. Arch Microbiol. 1995 Jan;163(1):1–6. doi: 10.1007/BF00262196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rudolph J., Oesterhelt D. Chemotaxis and phototaxis require a CheA histidine kinase in the archaeon Halobacterium salinarium. EMBO J. 1995 Feb 15;14(4):667–673. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07045.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rudolph J., Oesterhelt D. Deletion analysis of the che operon in the archaeon Halobacterium salinarium. J Mol Biol. 1996 May 17;258(4):548–554. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sar N., McCarter L., Simon M., Silverman M. Chemotactic control of the two flagellar systems of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J Bacteriol. 1990 Jan;172(1):334–341. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.1.334-341.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sourjik V., Schmitt R. Different roles of CheY1 and CheY2 in the chemotaxis of Rhizobium meliloti. Mol Microbiol. 1996 Nov;22(3):427–436. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.1291489.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Stock J. B., Surette M. G., McCleary W. R., Stock A. M. Signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis. J Biol Chem. 1992 Oct 5;267(28):19753–19756. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wohlleben W., Arnold W., Bissonnette L., Pelletier A., Tanguay A., Roy P. H., Gamboa G. C., Barry G. F., Aubert E., Davies J. On the evolution of Tn21-like multiresistance transposons: sequence analysis of the gene (aacC1) for gentamicin acetyltransferase-3-I(AAC(3)-I), another member of the Tn21-based expression cassette. Mol Gen Genet. 1989 Jun;217(2-3):202–208. doi: 10.1007/BF02464882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yildiz F. H., Gest H., Bauer C. E. Conservation of the photosynthesis gene cluster in Rhodospirillum centenum. Mol Microbiol. 1992 Sep;6(18):2683–2691. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01445.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES