Abstract
The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade is required for mitogenesis in somatic mammalian cells and is activated by a wide variety of oncogenic stimuli. Specific roles for this signaling module in growth were dissected by inhibiting MAPK kinase 1 (MAPKK1) activity in highly synchronized NIH 3T3 cells. In addition to the known role of this kinase in cell-cycle entry from G0, the level of MAPKK activity was observed to affect the kinetics of progression through both the G1 and G2 phases of the cell cycle in NIH 3T3 cells. Ectopic expression of dominant-negative forms of MAPKK1, which was previously shown to inhibit G0/G1 progression, was found to also delay progression of cells through G2. In addition, treatment of cells with the specific MAPKK inhibitor PD 98059 during a synchronous S phase arrested the cells in the following G2 phase. These data demonstrate a novel role for the MAPK cascade in progression from G2 into mitosis in NIH 3T3 cells.
Activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade is critical in the control of cellular growth by mitogenic signals in many different cell systems, including those received by tyrosine kinase, G protein-coupled and cytokine receptors, as reviewed in ref. 1. Introduction of dominant-negative forms of MAPK or MAPKK blocks quiescent cells from entering the cell cycle in response to growth factors (2–4). Activated forms of MAPKK lead to reduced dependence of cellular growth on mitogens as well as increased growth rate (3, 4) and can promote tumor growth in vivo (4–6).
The MAPK cascade consists of a series of serine/threonine kinases activated downstream of the small G-protein, Ras. Ras-GTP binds to and activates the serine/threonine kinase, Raf. Raf directly activates MAPKK1 and MAPKK2, which in turn activate the MAPK isoforms extracellular-regulated kinases (ERK)1 and ERK2 . On stimulation of cells with mitogens, ERK1 and ERK2, along with the downstream kinases of the ribosomal subunit kinase family, translocate to the nucleus where they phosphorylate a number of transcription factors (7). In addition to a nuclear function, MAPK has important functions in the cytoplasm. One-half of active MAPK fractionates with the microtubule cytoskeleton in cell extracts (8). Through phosphorylation of microtubule-associated proteins, MAPK regulates microtubule dynamics and other cytoskeletal changes that accompany growth (9–11). An additional pool of MAPKK1 has been shown to regulate breakdown of Golgi cisternae before cell division (12). The MAPK cascade appears to affect growth through both a nuclear function in transcriptional regulation and cytoskeletal regulated processes.
During meiosis, activation of the MAPK cascade by a germ cell-specific MAPKK activator, Mos, releases immature oocytes from a G2 arrest and promotes a metaphase arrest in meiosis II (13, 14). The role of the MAPK cascade in the proliferation of mammalian somatic cells independent of a role in cell-cycle entry from G0 has not been well characterized. We observed previously that ectopic expression of MAPKK1 mutants affected the growth rate of cycling cells (3). A role for the MAPK cascade in progression through the mammalian somatic cell cycle was investigated in this report by synchronizing NIH 3T3 cells and measuring the kinetics of progression through different cell-cycle phases under conditions where MAPKK activation was inhibited. In addition to a predicted role in the G1 phase, MAPKK activity was found to be required at the G2/M transition for the timely activation of CDC2 and progression into mitosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell Culture.
Stable cell lines were generated from NIH 3T3 cells obtained from American Type Culture Collection in 1995, as described previously (3). For synchronization, cells were plated at low density and serum starved. After 48 hr, cells were stimulated with 10% FCS and 1 μg/ml aphidicolin (Sigma). After 16–18 hr, cells were washed to remove the aphidicolin and overlaid with DMEM + 10% FCS. Experiments with PD 98059 were carried out with platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) as a mitogen, because PD 98059 did not block MAPK activation by 10% FCS (unpublished results). Quiescent cells were stimulated with 0.2 nM PDGF and 1 μl/ml 1,000× insulin, transferrin, selenium (ITS) (GIBCO/BRL) in DMEM. In the defined medium, cells cycled through all phases more slowly than with growth in FCS. PD 98059 (Calbiochem) was added to cells from a 10 mM solution in DMSO. An equivalent volume of DMSO was added to control plates.
Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorter (FACS) Analysis.
Cells were trypsinized and fixed in 70% ethanol. Washed cells were stained with propidium iodide (PI) [4 mM sodium citrate/0.1% Triton X-100/30 units/ml DNase-free RNase A (Boehringer Mannheim)/50 μg/ml PI (Sigma)]. For MPM-2 staining, cells were fixed in 90% MeOH and incubated in a 1:750 dilution of the MPM-2 antibody followed by a 1:250 dilution of FITC-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG (BioSource International, Camarillo, CA) in PBS with 3% BSA/0.05% Tween 20/2% NaN3. Cells were then stained with PI as described above. The MPM-2 antibody experiments were performed in the laboratory of R. Margolis in Grenoble, and in these experiments the overall cell-cycle transit time for all cell lines was faster by several hours than experiments performed in Seattle. The altered rate of growth is likely because of differences in FCS stocks between the two laboratories. All data were interpreted based on comparison of control cells analyzed in the same experiment. Analysis was done on a FACScan system by using the lysis II program (Becton Dickinson). Histograms were prepared from the data by using reproman (True Facts, Seattle, WA) or lysis II. The percent of cells in G1, S, or G2/M was quantified by DNA content by using the reproman program. A cell population was recorded as being in a particular phase at time points when >50% of the cells fell within the corresponding window of PI fluorescence intensity. The kinetics of cell-cycle progression was measured in two to seven independent experiments for each clone.
MAPK Assays.
Cell extracts were prepared in 50 mM β-glycero-phosphate/0.1 mM Na3VO4/1 mM DTT/1% Triton X-100/1 mM EGTA, pH 7.5/10 μg/ml leupeptin (United States Biochemical)/10 μg/ml aprotinin (Sigma)/2 μg/ml pepstatin A (Sigma)/1 mM each benzamidine (Sigma) and Pefabloc (Sigma). Cell lysates were fractionated by centrifugation at 14 K rpm. Supernatants were quick frozen at −70°C. MAPKK, and MAPK activities were measured in solution on DE-52 fractionated extracts as described previously (15). By using this method, MAPKK1 and MAPKK2 activities are measured collectively, as are those of ERK1 and ERK2. MAPK phosphorylation in vivo was monitored by gel mobility shift assays performed on SDS gels with an acrylamide/bisacrylamide ratio of 30:0.4 and probed with an antiserum that recognizes both ERK1 and ERK2 (3).
CDC2 Kinase Assays.
Extracts were prepared as described for the MAPK assays. Cell extract (200 μg) was immunoprecipitated with anti-cyclin B antibody (no. SC-245, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and protein A-Sepharose (Sigma). The immunoprecipitates were incubated with 4 μg histone H1 protein (Sigma) in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5/10 mM MnCl2/1 mM DTT/70 mM NaCl/10 mM γ-32P-ATP (New England Nuclear) at 37°C for 30 min in an Eppendorf Thermomixer. Reactions were analyzed by SDS/PAGE and autoradiography. Relative 32P-incorporation was quantified by Storage PhosphorImaging (Molecular Dynamics).
RESULTS
Expression of MAPKK Mutants Alters the Kinetics of G2/M Progression.
Ectopic expression of catalytically inactive forms of MAPKK1 generates a “dominant-negative” phenotype, interfering with activation of the endogenous enzyme. Expression of these MAPKK1 mutants in NIH 3T3 cells blocks cell from entering the cell cycle (3). Cells expressing the dominant-negative mutants also displayed slower growth rates (3). To determine when MAPKK activity was functioning in cycling cells, NIH 3T3 cell lines expressing mutant forms of MAPKK were synchronized by using a serum starvation/aphidicolin double block and examined for effects on the kinetics of cell-cycle progression. The two different dominant-negative forms of MAPKK1 used included mutation of the ATP-binding lysine (K97A) and mutation of one of the two regulatory phosphorylation sites (S222A). Cell lines expressing either wild-type or another mutant form of MAPKK1 (S222E) as well as mock-transfected cells were examined as controls. The S222E mutant behaved essentially like wild-type kinase because it still requires phosphorylation of serine 218 for activation (3).
Quiescent cells were stimulated to enter G1 with 10% FCS. At the time of stimulation, aphidicolin was added to collect the stimulated cells at the G1/S boundary 14 to 18 hr later. Aphidicolin binds directly to DNA polymerase and blocks DNA synthesis, while allowing for RNA and protein synthesis and progression through G1 (16). Within 1 hr of the removal of the aphidicolin, 80–90% of the cells commenced DNA synthesis as seen by an increase in fluorescence intensity of cells stained with PI and analyzed by FACS. Cells maintained ≥80% synchrony through the cell cycle (Fig. 1A).
As compared with controls, cells expressing the dominant-negative forms of MAPKK1 were delayed in G2/M. Two or three independent clones expressing each mutant class were tested (Table 1), and FACS histograms from a representative experiment are shown in Fig. 1A. All the cell lines demonstrated similar rates of progression through S phase, except the K97A mutant expressing cells that showed a 1-hr elongation of S phase. On completion of DNA synthesis, the cells expressing either of the dominant-negative mutants maintained 4n DNA content for 2–3 hr longer than controls (Fig. 1A). These data indicate that the cells with reduced MAPKK activity had a delay in either the onset of or progression through mitosis. In contrast, overexpression of a wild-type or the S222E mutant kinase had little or no effect on the progression through G2/M. Table 1 shows that similar results were obtained with multiple independently selected clones of mock-transfected controls or cells transfected with either S222A or S222E, arguing that differences were not caused simply by clonal variation.
Table 1.
Cell line | S phase, hr | G2/M phase, hr | G1 phase, hr |
---|---|---|---|
Mock-1 | 6.2 ± 0.2 | 3.0 ± 0.5 | 6.0 |
Mock 2 | 5.9 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.1 | 6.5 ± 0.5 |
Mock-9 | 5.9 ± 0.1 | 3.5 ± 0.1 | 5.9 ± 0.3 |
S222A-13* | 6.0 ± 0.2 | 5.9 ± 0.1 | ND |
S222A-21 | 6.5 ± 0.3 | 6.2 ± 0.4 | ND |
K97A-2 | 7.0 ± 0.0 | 6.7 ± 0.2 | ND |
S222E-1 | 5.8 ± 0.2 | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 4.6 ± 0.3 |
S22E-8 | 6.0† | 3.5 | 4.5 |
WT-31 | 6.0 ± 0.0 | 4.3 ± 0.3 | 7.0 |
WT-32 | 6.0 ± 0.0 | 3.7 ± 0.3 | 7.0 |
Each clone is labeled with the letters of the mutation, followed by the cell clone number assigned in the original isolation (e.g., S222A-13).
ND, not determined.
For some clones, the timine of cell-cycle progression was measured fewer than three times and standard error could not be calculated.
Expression of dominant-negative mutant MAPKK1 effectively blocks mitogen stimulation of the MAPK cascade in quiescent NIH 3T3 cells (3). To determine the effect of these mutants on MAPKK activity in cycling cells, endogenous MAPKK activity in cycling cells was measured in vivo by monitoring endogenous ERK1 and ERK2 phosphorylation in a gel mobility shift assay of synchronized cell extracts (Fig. 1B). In control cells, ERK phosphorylation was detectable throughout the cell cycle, albeit at a reduced level compared with that observed in stimulated quiescent cells (Fig. 1B and data not shown). In comparison, the ERK phosphorylation was significantly attenuated in the cells expressing the S222A-MAPKK (Fig. 1B) at all time points. As part of the synchronization protocol, the cells were re-fed with fresh serum-containing media after removal of the aphidicolin. This stimulation likely contributes to the ERK phosphorylation observed in the synchronized extracts, especially at the earlier time points (Fig. 1B). These data are shown to demonstrate the ability of the dominant-negative MAPKK1 mutant to block all endogenous MAPKK activity throughout the cell cycle in our experimental system. In general, MAPK is active throughout G1 and then reduces as the cells enter S phase (data not shown and ref. 46).
The delay with 4n DNA observed with expression of dominant-negative MAPKK mutants is consistent with either a G2 delay and/or a mitotic delay. To distinguish between the two, cells expressing MAPKK mutants were further analyzed for the appearance of the mitosis-specific MPM-2 antigens (17). MPM-2 is an antibody with specificity toward a number of mitosis-specific protein phosphorylation sites. The reactivity of cells with this antibody increases dramatically during mitosis (17). At time points after release into S phase, synchronized S222A MAPKK-transfected cells and control cells were stained with the MPM-2 monoclonal antibody as well as with PI for DNA content. A two-parameter FACS analysis allowed simultaneous assessment of DNA content and level of MPM-2 antigens for each cell (Fig. 2A). Fig. 2B graphically illustrates the percent of cells that were MPM-2-positive as a function of time in two experiments, Fig. 2B Left corresponding to the data in Fig. 2A. The mock-transfected cell line peaked in MPM-2 reactivity at 6.5 hr after release, whereas the dominant-negative S222A mutant peaked in MPM-2 signal at 8 hr. In an additional experiment (Fig. 2B Right), the S222E mutant, which showed normal G2/M kinetics by PI staining (Table 1), also peaked in MPM-2 signal at 6.5 hr, whereas the S222A mutant again showed delayed appearance of MPM-2 antigens. These results suggest that the dominant-negative mutant-expressing cells were delayed in G2. Further evidence that cells were delayed in G2 is that S222A mutant cells had a spread morphology and intact nuclear envelopes at 6.5 hr after release, whereas controls had peak populations of rounded cells without intact nuclei (data not shown).
The interphase-mitosis transition is triggered by the activation of the cyclin B-CDC2 kinase complex. Comparison of mock- and S222A-transfected cell lines revealed that the peak of CDC2 kinase activity in the S222A mutant was both attenuated and delayed by 2–3 hr (Fig. 2C). These data suggest that MAPKK activity was required for activation of CDC2 in G2, and the delay in progression into mitosis in the MAPKK-mutant expressing cells is a result of stalling CDC2 activation.
MAPKK Mutant Cells Develop a Tetraploid Subpopulation.
Another phenotype observed with the MAPKK overexpressing cell lines was that 10–30% of the cells were tetraploid, depending on the clone. Tetraploidy was observed as a subset of synchronized cells that had twice the DNA fluorescence intensity at all time points, cycling between 4n and 8n DNA content (Figs. 1A and 2A). The possibility that these cells represented cell–cell doublets was excluded by “gating” to include only single cells during collection of the FACS data. A defect in cytokinesis, as determined by the presence of binucleate cells, was ruled out by microscopic examination of PI-stained cells (data not shown). The generation of tetraploid cells is presumably caused by the cells undergoing two rounds DNA synthesis without mitosis or by failure of chromosome segregation in mitosis. A tetraploid subpopulation of cells was observed in seven of seven MAPKK mutant-expressing cell lines, but in only one of four mock-transfected cell lines. When a single cell cycle was examined in mutant cells as shown in Fig. 1, no measurable increases in ploidy were observed in the FACS analysis of PI-stained cells. This indicates that the incidence of mitotic bypass or failure was low, and that the significant percent of tetraploid cells was likely because of accumulation of events over multiple cell divisions during selection of the clonal cell lines.
The MAPKK Inhibitor PD 98059 Causes a G2 Arrest in Synchronously Growing Cells.
The G2 delay observed in the MAPKK mutant cells suggests that MAPKK activity is required for some aspect of G2 progression into mitosis. An inhibitor of MAPKK was added to synchronized NIH 3T3 cells late in S phase to test whether the kinase activity was specifically required during G2 as opposed to an indirect effect caused by a deficiency in essential G2 factors synthesized earlier in the cell cycle. The drug PD 98059 has been shown to specifically block the activation of MAPKK1 and MAPKK2 in vivo (18). This drug was relatively inactive in high serum (unpublished data), so the effects of PD 98059 on cell-cycle progression were assessed in cells grown in a defined medium with PDGF rather than whole serum as a mitogen.
Cells were synchronized with a serum starvation/aphidicolin double block and stimulated with PDGF to enter the cell cycle. PD 98059 was added 8 hr after release into S phase and cell-cycle progression was followed for 30 hr (Fig. 3A). At 20 hr after release into S phase, the control cells had completed mitosis and returned to G1, whereas all of the cells treated with PD 98059 were arrested in G2 with 4n DNA content. The arrested cells maintained the flat morphology and intact nuclear envelope characteristic of interphase cells (microscopic data not shown). Drug-treated cells remained blocked with 4n DNA content for an additional 10 hr, with only 30% of the cells successfully completing mitosis and reentering G1 by the 30-hr time point. The subset of cells that reentered G1 either eventually acquired the ability to undergo mitosis in the absence of MAPKK activity, or the active concentration of the PD 98059 fell below a threshold level allowing sufficient MAPKK to be activated in these cells. The latter possibility is supported by our observation that PD 98059 only poorly inhibits MAPKK activation by growth factors when the drug is added 16 hr before stimulation, as compared with 30 min before stimulation (J. S. Campbell and J.H.W., unpublished results). With either explanation, the block induced by the drug appears to be reversible. When CDC2-cyclin B activation was measured in synchronized cell extracts prepared from cells treated with the drug in late S phase, PD 98059 significantly reduced the activation of CDC2 as compared with the DMSO control (Fig. 3B).
The dose response for the arrest of cells in G2 by PD 98059 was compared with the dose response for drug inhibition of MAPKK and MAPK activation by PDGF. Various doses of PD 98059 were added to synchronized S phase cells, and the percentage of cells in G2 vs. G1 was assessed at 20 hr after release. Both G2 progression (Fig. 3C Upper) and activation of MAPKK and MAPK (Fig. 3C Lower) were inhibited in a dose-responsive manner. The doses required for inhibition of the kinases and for G2 progression were comparable. PD 98059 (100 μM) blocked MAPKK and MAPK activation completely and caused significant cell cycle arrest in G2. At PD 98059 concentrations of 30 and 50 μM, MAPKK activation was still significantly blocked, yet MAPK activation was only 50% inhibited and only a slight delay in G2 was observed (Fig. 3C). The equivalence of the dose responses is consistent with PD 98059 blocking cells in G2 as a result of blocking MAPK activation. To rule out the possibility of any artifactual requirement for MAPKK activity in G2 as a result of holding the cells at the G1/S boundary, quiescent cells were stimulated with PDGF in the absence of aphidicolin. PD 98059 was added 20 hr later after all the cells had entered the cell cycle (PD 98059 treatment will block the cells from entering the cycle if added with mitogen) (19). Even in the absence of an aphidicolin arrest, 100 μM PD 98059 still caused a dramatic G2 arrest (Fig. 4).
In parallel experiments, PD 98059 was added to synchronized cells in early G1 at 17 hr after aphidicolin release. Under these conditions, MAPKK inhibition arrested postmitotic cells in G1 (data not shown). This result was anticipated based on the fact that MAPKK has been shown to be required for the G0/G1–S transition (3). Together, these data indicate that MAPKK activity is required for both the G2/M and G1/S transitions in actively cycling NIH 3T3 cells.
DISCUSSION
It has previously been established that activation of MAPK cascade is essential for entry into the somatic cell cycle in response to mitogens. A careful analysis of synchronized cells has revealed that the MAPK cascade functions not only in the G0/G1– S transition but also in the transition from G2 to M in NIH 3T3 cells. Initially, we expected our previously published reduction in growth rate of cells expressing dominant-negative MAPKK mutants (3) to be explained by cells having a longer G1 phase or a greater propensity to exit the cell cycle after mitosis. Instead the slower growth in these cells was linked to a delay in G2/M progression in multiple independent clones. Cells were delayed either in G2 or early prophase by the criterion that cells remained longer with 4n DNA content, but before nuclear envelope breakdown, CDC2 activation, and MPM-2 epitope phosphorylation. This result is in accord with evidence for a G2/M function of two oncogenes that activate the MAPK cascade, Src and Raf, reviewed in ref. 20.
The ability of the MAPKK inhibitor PD 98059 added in late S phase to block the following G2/M transition corroborates results obtained with the mutant cells. It also indicates that MAPKK activity was required directly during these latter phases of the cell cycle rather than being required earlier for expression of a protein that functions later at the G2/M transition. Although PD 98059 has been shown to be a specific inhibitor of MAPKK (not inhibiting other kinases) (18), it has recently been found to be a potent inhibitor of cyclooxygenase (21). This alternative activity of PD 98059 is not likely to be responsible for the G2 arrest, because the doses of drug required to inhibit both MAPK activation and G2 progression were similar, whereas the dose required for cyclooxygenase inhibition is two orders of magnitude lower than was required for G2 arrest (21).
In Xenopus oocytes, the MAPK cascade plays an essential role in the onset of meiosis I during meiotic maturation (22–24) in response to synthesis of the germ cell-specific MAPKK activator Mos. Data presented here are the first evidence that MAPKK functions in the onset of mitosis in somatic cells where Mos is not expressed (13). Our results in fibroblasts are also in marked contrast to cycling embryonic extracts from Xenopus, where MAPK activity is not required for mitotic entry (25) and can even inhibit mitotic entry when inappropriately activated (26, 27, 47). These early mitotic cycles differ from somatic cell cycles in that they are very rapid and lack G1 and G2 phases (28). Likely MAPKK functions in a somatic cell G2 checkpoint that is absent during embryogenesis. There are multiple checkpoints in somatic cells during G2 or early prophase before nuclear envelope breakdown such as those that sense DNA damage or incomplete DNA replication and decatenation, reviewed in ref. 29. Interestingly, a Schizosaccharomyces pombe MAPKK homologue, WIS1, has been shown to function as a dose-dependent inducer of mitosis (30). In mammalian cells, MAPKK2 has been implicated in recovery from a DNA damage-induced G2 arrest (48). Because 100 μM PD 98059 blocks both MAPKK1 and MAPKK2 activation (18), the G2 block we observed when cells are drug treated in S phase may relate to this DNA damage-induced checkpoint.
The G2/M phase transition is triggered by the activation of the CDC2-cyclin B kinase complex (31, 32). CDC2-cyclin B kinase activation in G2 was delayed in the dominant-negative MAPKK-expressing cell lines and was also blocked by addition of PD 98059 to S phase cells, indicating that MAPKK activity was required for the activation of CDC2 at the G2/M transition. The CDC2 kinase is regulated by multiple factors, which culminate in the rapid dephosphorylation of CDC2 and activation of the CDC2-cyclin B complex at the G2/M transition (33). Cyclin B protein levels are cell-cycle regulated, with the protein synthesized de novo each cell cycle (34). In data not shown, Western blots probed with anti-cyclin B revealed no decrease in cyclin B levels in the same synchronized extracts from MAPKK dominant-negative mutant-expressing cells that were delayed in CDC2 activation. Thus a deficiency of cyclin B was not responsible for the observed G2 delay in the mutant cells.
Myt1 is a major protein kinase activity in somatic cells that keeps cyclin B-CDC2 complexes inactive through phosphorylation during S and G2 phases (35). The MAPK-regulated kinase ribosomal subunit kinase phosphorylates and inactivates Myt1 (36). MAPK inhibition could therefore increase Myt1 activity and prevent CDC2 activation. MAPK could also regulate CDC2 through phosphorylation of cyclin B. Cyclin B is a substrate for MAPK (37), and phosphorylation of cyclin B on MAPK sites is important for translocation of the complex to the nucleus, where it is activated by CDC25C (38). MAPK may also regulate CDC2 activation indirectly through regulation of microtubule networks where the CDC2-cyclin B complex is localized (39). MAPK plays an essential role in spindle formation (40), and MAPKK1 is required for Golgi fragmentation (12), providing two important cytoplasmic functions for these kinases in the G2/M transition. MAPKK function at G2/M may also be nuclear given a recent report showing striking translocation of MAPKK1 to the nucleus during early prophase (41).
In addition to the effect on cell-cycle kinetics, overexpression of MAPKK1 mutants induced tetraploidy in a subpopulation of cells, indicating that these cells bypassed mitosis or failed in chromosome segregation with some frequency. Unlike the G2 delay, the tetraploidy developed in cell lines ectopically expressing all forms of MAPKK1, both active and inactive. MAPK likely has multiple roles in mitosis and needs to be correctly activated and inactivated for normal mitotic progression. Indeed, it was shown in Xenopus that the level of MAPK activity affects the duration of mitosis (40). In the recent report from Abbott and Holt discussed above (48), it is interesting to note that a fraction of their MAPKK1-mutant cells developed a new peak of 8n DNA after recovery from ionizing radiation. This indicates that, although they show that MAPKK2 is required for recovery from the arrest, MAPKK1 may be important to prevent cells from bypassing mitosis after DNA damage. The observation that a pool of active MAPK localizes to kinetochores in mammalian cells suggests that MAPK may play a direct positive role in chromosome segregation (42, 43). A role for the MAPK cascade in mitotic fidelity is supported by a pronounced decrease in chromosome stability with deregulation of activators of the MAPK cascade (44, 45).
The MAPK cascade has been extensively studied in the stimulation of quiescent cells with mitogenic factors and is generally considered to be an important factor in the initiation of growth or mitogenesis. We have investigated the role for the MAPK cascade in actively growing cells by examining interactions between MAPKK activity and different cell-cycle phases by using synchronized NIH 3T3 cells. Results presented here demonstrate that this cascade not only promotes growth through mitogenic signaling to enter the cell cycle, but also functions in putative signal transduction pathways required for progression through the G1 and G2 phases of the cell cycle in actively cycling fibroblasts.
Acknowledgments
We thank the laboratory of Russell Ross for the generous gift of purified PDGF, the laboratory of Melanie Cobb for the plasmid for ERK2 expression, and the laboratory of P. N. Rao for the MPM-2 antibody. We thank Dave Coder for his assistance in generation and interpretation of FACScan data. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant no. DK42528 awarded to the laboratory of E.G.K., as well as through funding from an International Human Frontiers Science Program grant awarded jointly to the laboratories of E.G.K., E. H. Fischer, R.L.M., and S.-H. Shen. J.H.W. was supported in part through postdoctoral fellowships from the Muscular Dystrophy Association of America, and from National Institutes of Health training grant no. HL07–312 awarded to the Department of Pathology at the University of Washington under the direction of S. M. Schwartz.
ABBREVIATIONS
- MAPK
mitogen-activated protein kinase
- ERK
extracellular regulated kinase
- MAPKK
MAPK kinase
- PDGF
platelet-derived growth factor
- FACS
fluorescence-activated cell sorter
- PI
propidium iodide
References
- 1.Robinson M J, Cobb M H. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997;9:180–186. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(97)80061-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pages G, Lenormand P, L’Allemain G, Chambard J C, Meloche S, Pouyssegur J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:8319–8323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.18.8319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Seger R, Seger D, Reszka A A, Munar E S, Eldar Finkelman H, Dobrowolska G, Jensen A M, Campbell J S, Fischer E H, Krebs E G. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:25699–25709. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brunet A, Pages G, Pouyssegur J. Oncogene. 1994;9:3379–3387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mansour S J, Matten W T, Hermann A S, Candia J M, Rong S, Fukasawa K, Vande Woude G F, Ahn N G. Science. 1994;265:966–970. doi: 10.1126/science.8052857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cowley S, Paterson H, Kemp P, Marshall C J. Cell. 1994;77:841–852. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90133-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Treisman R. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1996;8:205–215. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(96)80067-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Reszka A A, Seger R, Diltz C D, Krebs E G, Fischer E H. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:8881–8885. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.19.8881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Reszka A A, Bulinski J C, Krebs E G, Fischer E H. Mol Biol Cell. 1997;8:1219–1232. doi: 10.1091/mbc.8.7.1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gotoh Y, Nishida E, Matsuda S, Shiina N, Kosako H, Shiokawa K, Akiyama T, Ohta K, Sakai H. Nature (London) 1991;349:251–254. doi: 10.1038/349251a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lovric J, Dammeier S, Kieser A, Mischak H, Kolch W. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:22848–22855. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Acharya U, Mallabiabarrena A, Acharya J K, Malhotra V. Cell. 1998;92:183–192. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80913-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sagata N. BioEssays. 1997;19:13–21. doi: 10.1002/bies.950190105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gebauer F, Richter J D. BioEssays. 1997;19:23–28. doi: 10.1002/bies.950190106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ahn N G, Weiel J E, Chan C P, Krebs E G. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:11487–11494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pedrali Noy G, Spadari S, Miller Faures A, Miller A O, Kruppa J, Koch G. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980;8:377–387. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.2.377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Davis F M, Tsao T Y, Fowler S K, Rao P N. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1983;80:2926–2930. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.10.2926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Alessi D R, Cuenda A, Cohen P, Dudley D T, Saltiel A R. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:27489–94. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.46.27489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dudley D T, Pang L, Decker S J, Bridges A J, Saltiel A R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:7686–7689. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.17.7686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Laird A D, Shalloway D. Cell Signal. 1997;9:249–255. doi: 10.1016/s0898-6568(96)00176-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Borsch-Haubold A G, Pasquet S, Watson S P. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:28766–28772. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.44.28766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gotoh Y, Masuyama N, Dell K, Shirakabe K, Nishida E. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:25898–258904. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.43.25898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Haccard O, Lewellyn A, Hartley R S, Erikson E, Maller J L. Dev Biol. 1995;168:677–682. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1995.1112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kosako H, Gotoh Y, Nishida E. EMBO J. 1994;13:2131–2138. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06489.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Takenaka K, Gotoh Y, Nishida E. J Cell Biol. 1997;136:1091–1097. doi: 10.1083/jcb.136.5.1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Abrieu A, Fisher D, Simon M-N, Doree M, Picard A. EMBO J. 1997;16:6407–6413. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.21.6407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Walter S A, Guadagno T M, Ferrell J E J. Mol Biol Cell. 1997;8:2157–2169. doi: 10.1091/mbc.8.11.2157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gerhart J C. In: Mechanisms Regulating Pattern Formation in the Amphibian Egg and Early Embryo. Goldberger R F, editor. Vol. 2. New York: Plenum; 1980. pp. 133–316. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Elledge S J. Science. 1996;274:1664–1668. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5293.1664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Warbrick E, Fantes P A. EMBO J. 1991;10:4291–4299. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb05007.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Riabowol K, Draetta G, Brizuela L, Vandre D, Beach D. Cell. 1989;57:393–401. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90914-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Th’ng J P, Wright P S, Hamaguchi J, Lee M G, Norbury C J, Nurse P, Bradbury E M. Cell. 1990;63:313–324. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90164-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Morgan D O. Nature (London) 1995;374:131–134. doi: 10.1038/374131a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sherr C J. Science. 1996;274:1672–1677. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5293.1672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Liu F, Stanton J j, Wu Z, Piwnica-Worms H. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17:571–583. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.2.571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Palmer A, Gavin A-C, Nebreda A R. EMBO J. 1998;17:5037–5047. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.17.5037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Izumi T, Maller J L. Mol Cell Biol. 1991;11:3860–3867. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.8.3860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Li J, Meyer A N, Donoghue D J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:502–507. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.2.502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ookata K, Hisanaga S, Bulinski J C, Murofushi H, Aizawa H, Itoh T J, Hotani H, Okumura E, Tachibana K, Kishimoto T. J Cell Biol. 1995;128:849–862. doi: 10.1083/jcb.128.5.849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Guadagno T M, Ferrell J E., Jr Science. 1998;282:1312–1315. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5392.1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tolwinski N S, Shapiro P S, Goueli S, Ahn N G. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:6168–6174. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.10.6168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zecevic M, Catling A D, Eblen S T, Renzi L, Hittle J C, Yen T J, Gorbsky G J, Weber M J. J Cell Biol. 1998;142:1547–1558. doi: 10.1083/jcb.142.6.1547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shapiro P S, Vaisberg E, Hunt A J, Tolwinski N S, Whalen A M, McIntosh J R, Ahn N G. J Cell Biol. 1998;142:1533–1545. doi: 10.1083/jcb.142.6.1533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Denko N C, Giaccia A J, Stringer J R, Stambrook P J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:5124–5128. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.11.5124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fukasawa K, Vande Woude G F. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17:506–518. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.1.506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Meloche S. J Cell Physiol. 1995;163:577–588. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041630319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bitangcol J C, Chau A S, Stadnick E, Lohka M J, Dicken B, Shibuya E K. Mol Biol Cell. 1998;9:451–467. doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.2.451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Abbott D W, Holt J T. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:2732–2742. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.5.2732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]