Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1981 Mar;19(3):454–460. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.3.454

Antimicrobial Activity of Cefmenoxime (SCE-1365)

John M Stamm 1, Roland L Girolami 1, Nathan L Shipkowitz 1, Robert R Bower 1
PMCID: PMC181453  PMID: 6264846

Abstract

The in vitro activity of cefmenoxime (SCE-1365 or A-50912), a new semisynthetic cephalosporin antibiotic, was compared with those of cefazolin, cefoxitin, and cefamandole against a broad spectrum of 486 organisms and with that of cefotaxime against 114 organisms. Cefmenoxime and cefotaxime exhibited nearly equivalent activities against those organisms tested and were the most active of these cephalosporins against all aerobic and facultative organisms except Staphylococcus aureus. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of cefmenoxime required to inhibit at least 90% of strains tested (MIC90) ranged from 0.06 to 8 μg/ml for the Enterobacteriaceae. The MIC90s for gram-positive cocci were 0.015 and ≤0.008 μg/ml for Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes, respectively, and 2 μg/ml for S. aureus. Group D streptococci were less susceptible. Cefmenoxime was very active against Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Neisseria meningitidis with MIC90s ranging from ≤0.008 to 0.25 μg/ml. Cefmenoxime, at a concentration of 16 μg/ml, inhibited 78% and 73% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., respectively. MICs for anaerobes ranged from 0.5 to >128 μg/ml with good activity against the gram-positive organisms. In addition, cefmenoxime activity was bactericidal and only slightly affected by differences in inoculum size. The combination of cefmenoxime and gentamicin was synergistic against 80% of the Enterobacteriaceae and 100% of P. aeruginosa strains tested. Development of resistance to cefmenoxime was slow or absent for organisms with low initial MICs but more rapid for those with higher initial MICs. Cefmenoxime exhibited good protective activity in mice infected with Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris, or S. aureus but was less effective against P. aeruginosa.

Full text

PDF
456

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hamilton-Miller J. M., Brumfitt W., Reynolds A. V. Cefotoxime (HR 756) a new cephalosporin with exceptional broad-spectrum activity in vitro. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1978 Sep;4(5):437–444. doi: 10.1093/jac/4.5.437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Neu H. C., Aswapokee N., Aswapokee P., Fu K. P. HR 756, a new cephalosporin active against gram-positive and gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Feb;15(2):273–281. doi: 10.1128/aac.15.2.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rahal J. J., Jr Antibiotic combinations: the clinical relevance of synergy and antagonism. Medicine (Baltimore) 1978 Mar;57(2):179–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Shah P. M., Troche G., Stille W. In vitro activity of HR 756, a new cephalosporin compound. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1978 Nov;31(11):1170–1174. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.31.1170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tsuchiya K., Kondo M., Kida M., Nakao M., Iwahi T., Nishi T., Noji Y., Takeuchi M., Nozaki Y. Cefmenoxime (SCE-1365), a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin: in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Jan;19(1):56–65. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.1.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES