Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1982 Mar;21(3):436–440. doi: 10.1128/aac.21.3.436

Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns among coagulase-negative staphylococci.

S B Price, D J Flournoy
PMCID: PMC181911  PMID: 7103446

Abstract

Coagulase-negative staphylococci, identified as S. epidermidis, S. saprophyticus, S. haemolyticus, S. hominis, and S. warneri, were tested for susceptibility to a number of antimicrobial agents by disk agar diffusion and broth microdilution methods, S. warneri and S. saprophyticus were found to be the most susceptible, and S. haemolyticus and S. epidermidis were found to be the least susceptible. Differences in antimicrobial susceptibility patterns are discussed, along with their epidemiological and therapeutic implications.

Full text

PDF
437

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Archer G. L., Vazquez G. J., Johnston J. L. Antibiotic prophylaxis of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Infect Dis. 1980 Nov;142(5):725–731. doi: 10.1093/infdis/142.5.725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauer A. W., Kirby W. M., Sherris J. C., Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966 Apr;45(4):493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ein M. E., Smith N. J., Aruffo J. F., Heerema M. S., Bradshaw M. W., Williams T. W., Jr Susceptibility and synergy studies of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Nov;16(5):655–659. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.5.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Flournoy D. J., Perryman F. A. LY127935, a new beta-lactam antibiotic, versus Proteus, Klebsiella, Serratia, and Pseudomonas. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Nov;16(5):641–643. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.5.641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kloos W. E., Schleifer K. H. Simplified scheme for routine identification of human Staphylococcus species. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Jan;1(1):82–88. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.1.82-88.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lowy F. D., Walsh J. A., Mayers M. M., Klein R. S., Steigbigel N. H. Antibiotic activity in vitro against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis and therapy of an experimental infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Sep;16(3):314–321. doi: 10.1128/aac.16.3.314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Maskell R. Importance of coagulase-negative staphylococci as pathogens in the urinary tract. Lancet. 1974 Jun 8;1(7867):1155–1158. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90634-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Oeding P., Digranes A. Classification of coagulase-negative staphylococci in the diagnostic laboratory. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B. 1977 Apr;85(2):136–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1977.tb01687.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Reimer L. G., Stratton C. W., Reller L. B. Minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations of 44 antimicrobial agents against three standard control strains in broth with and without human serum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Jun;19(6):1050–1055. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.6.1050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sabath L. D., Garner C., Wilcox C., Finland M. Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis to 65 antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Jun;9(6):962–969. doi: 10.1128/aac.9.6.962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wilkinson B. J., Maxwell S., Schaus S. M. Classification and characteristics of coagulase-negative, methicillin-resistant staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Aug;12(2):161–166. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.2.161-166.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES