Skip to main content
PMC home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1989 Feb 18;298(6671):433–436. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6671.433

Using nurses for preventive activities with computer assisted follow up: a randomised controlled trial.

J Robson 1, K Boomla 1, S Fitzpatrick 1, A J Jewell 1, J Taylor 1, J Self 1, M Colyer 1
PMCID: PMC1835698  PMID: 2495053

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To assess whether an organised programme of prevention including the use of a health promotion nurse noticeably improved recording and follow up of cardiovascular risk factors and cervical smears in a general practice that had access to computerised cell and recall. DESIGN--Randomised controlled trial. SETTING--General practice in inner London. PATIENTS--All 3206 men and women aged 30-64 registered with the practice. INTERVENTION--The intervention group had their risk factors ascertained and followed up by the health promotion nurse and the general practitioner, whereas those in the control group were managed by the general practitioner alone. END POINT--Recording and follow up of blood pressure and cervical smears after three years. Recording of smoking, family history of ischaemic heart disease, and serum cholesterol concentrations were also examined. MEASUREMENTS and MAIN RESULTS--When the trial was stopped after two years the measurements of blood pressure in the preceding five years were 93% (1511/1620) v 73% (1160/1586) (95% confidence interval for difference 17.5 to 22.7%) for intervention and control groups respectively. For patients with hypertension the figures were 97% (104/107) v 69% (80/116) (18.2 to 38.2%). For women the proportion who had had a cervical smear in the preceding three years were 76% (606/799) v 49% (392/806) (22.5 to 31.9%). Recording of smoking, family history of ischaemic heart disease, and serum cholesterol concentrations was also higher in the intervention group compared with the control group. CONCLUSION--An organised programme, which includes a nurse with specific responsibility for adult prevention, is likely to make an important contribution to recording of risk factors and follow up of those patients with known risks.

Full text

PDF
436

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson J. V., Coupe M. O., Morris J. A., Hodgson H. J., Bloom S. R. Remission of symptoms in carcinoid syndrome with a new 5-hydroxytryptamine M receptor antagonist. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 May 2;294(6580):1129–1129. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6580.1129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brownbridge G., Evans A., Fitter M., Platts M. An interactive computerized protocol for the management of hypertension: effects on the general practitioner's clinical behaviour. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 May;36(286):198–202. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Butler J. R. Primary care in the inner cities. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Dec 13;293(6561):1519–1520. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6561.1519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coope J. Practising prevention. Hypertension. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 May 15;284(6327):1449–1450. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6327.1449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fraser R. C., Clayton D. G. The accuracy of age-sex registers, practice medical records and family practitioner committee registers. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 Jul;31(228):410–419. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fullard E., Fowler G., Gray M. Facilitating prevention in primary care. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Dec 8;289(6458):1585–1587. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6458.1585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fullard E., Fowler G., Gray M. Promoting prevention in primary care: controlled trial of low technology, low cost approach. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Apr 25;294(6579):1080–1082. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6579.1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hart J. T. Measurement of omission. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 Jun 5;284(6330):1686–1689. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6330.1686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hart J. T. Practice nurses: an underused resource. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Apr 20;290(6476):1162–1163. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6476.1162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kenkre J., Drury V. W., Lancashire R. J. Nurse management of hypertension clinics in general practice assisted by a computer. Fam Pract. 1985 Mar;2(1):17–22. doi: 10.1093/fampra/2.1.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lichtenstein M. J., Elwood P. C., Thomas H. F., Sweetnam P. M. Doctors' opinions on the prevention of myocardial infarction. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985 Nov;35(280):516–519. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McAlister N. H., Covvey H. D., Tong C., Lee A., Wigle E. D. Randomised controlled trial of computer assisted management of hypertension in primary care. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Sep 13;293(6548):670–674. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6548.670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Michael G. Quality of care in managing hypertension by case finding in north west London. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Mar 24;288(6421):906–908. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6421.906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Morrell D. C., Evans M. E., Morris R. W., Roland M. O. The "five minute" consultation: effect of time constraint on clinical content and patient satisfaction. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Mar 29;292(6524):870–873. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6524.870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pill R., French J., Harding K., Stott N. Invitation to attend a health check in a general practice setting: comparison of attenders and non-attenders. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988 Feb;38(307):53–56. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pill R., Stott N. Invitation to attend a health check in a general practice setting: the views of a cohort of non-attenders. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988 Feb;38(307):57–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Press R. S. Kak oformit' sanitarnyi biulleten'. Med Sestra. 1988 Nov;47(11):11–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Spitzer W. O., Sackett D. L., Sibley J. C., Roberts R. S., Gent M., Kergin D. J., Hackett B. C., Olynich A. The Burlington randomized trial of the nurse practitioner. N Engl J Med. 1974 Jan 31;290(5):251–256. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197401312900506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stilwell B., Greenfield S., Drury M., Hull F. M. A nurse practitioner in general practice: working style and pattern of consultations. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Apr;37(297):154–157. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES