Skip to main content
PMC home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1989 Oct 28;299(6707):1090–1092. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6707.1090

Outcome of pregnancies referred to a general practitioner maternity unit in a district hospital.

A Prentice 1, S M Walton 1
PMCID: PMC1837972  PMID: 2511975

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To audit the outcome of pregnancies booked for confinement in a general practitioner maternity unit in a district general hospital. DESIGN--Retrospective review of case records. SETTING--General practitioner maternity unit in a district general hospital. PATIENTS--685 Women referred to a general practitioner unit in 1987. RESULTS--315 Nulliparous women and 330 multiparous women were booked for confinement; 202 women transferred to consultant care before delivery and a further 104 during labour or after delivery. Recognised risk factors, other than nulliparity, rarely predicted the need for transfer. Confinement in the general practitioner unit was associated with low intervention and good fetal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS--The general practitioner maternity unit provides a safe alternative for confinement in low risk pregnancies. High rates of transfer deny this facility to many women who desire confinement in a low technology environment.

Full text

PDF
1090

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cavenagh A. J., Phillips K. M., Sheridan B., Williams E. M. Contribution of isolated general practitioner maternity units. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 May 12;288(6428):1438–1440. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6428.1438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Garrett T., House W., Lowe S. W. Outcome of women booked into an isolated general practice maternity unit over eight years. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Nov;37(304):488–490. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Klein M., Lloyd I., Redman C., Bull M., Turnbull A. C. A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. I. Obstetrical procedures and neonatal outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 Feb;90(2):118–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb08894.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Klein M., Lloyd I., Redman C., Bull M., Turnbull A. C. A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. II. Labour and delivery management and neonatal outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 Feb;90(2):123–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb08895.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Marsh G. N., Cashman H. A., Russell I. T. General practitioner participation in intranatal care in the northern region in 1983. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Mar 30;290(6473):971–973. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6473.971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Marsh G. N., Channing D. M. Audit of 26 years of obstetrics in general practice. BMJ. 1989 Apr 22;298(6680):1077–1080. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6680.1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Marsh G. N. Obstetric audit in general practice. Br Med J. 1977 Oct 15;2(6093):1004–1006. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6093.1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Marsh G. Encouraging GP intranatal care. Practitioner. 1988 Oct 22;232(1456 ):1127–1131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Reynolds J. L., Yudkin P. L., Bull M. J. General practitioner obstetrics: does risk prediction work? J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988 Jul;38(312):307–310. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Young G. Are isolated maternity units run by general practitioners dangerous? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Mar 21;294(6574):744–746. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6574.744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES