Skip to main content
PMC home page
Applied Microbiology logoLink to Applied Microbiology
. 1974 Sep;28(3):417–422. doi: 10.1128/am.28.3.417-422.1974

Improved Isolation and Differentiation of Enterococci in Cheese

C J Efthymiou 1, P Baccash 1, V J Labombardi 1, D S Epstein 1
PMCID: PMC186735  PMID: 4214236

Abstract

Further documentation of an enterococcus selective differential (ESD) medium was obtained in isolations from eight different cheeses. An improved differentiation of tetrazolium salt (2, 3, 5-triphenyl tetrazolium hydrochloride [TTC])-reducing strains of Streptococcus faecalis from TTC-nonreducing or TTC-faintly-reducing Streptococcus faecium was attained. The sensitivity of the medium was evaluated in comparison with that of KF streptococcal, Pfizer selective enterococcus (PSE), the medium of Reinbold, Swern, and Hussong (RSH), and the medium of Saraswat, Clark, and Reinbold (SCR). Selective counts, rate of colony formation, and ease of isolation and differentiation of colonies were examined. The specificity of the medium was also investigated. ESD supported the fastest rate of growth and the maximum size of colonies; counts in this medium were in most cases possible with 17 h of incubation, whereas the other media required 24 to 48 h. A presumptive identification of 1,077 isolates by four biochemical tests disclosed that SCR, RSH, and ESD selected high, comparable percentages of strains that approximated most closely the typical description of enterococci (66, 60.1, and 58%, respectively). Low percentages (21.1 and 30.7%) were yielded by KF and PSE. The utility of ESD for a rapid, presumptive identification of enterococci was confirmed by serological and biochemical testing of color TTC-differentiated colonies isolated from 18 cheeses.

Full text

PDF
422

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARNES E. M. Tetrazolium reduction as a means of differentiating Streptococcus faecalis from Streptococcus faecium. J Gen Microbiol. 1956 Feb;14(1):57–68. doi: 10.1099/00221287-14-1-57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DEIBEL R. H., LAKE D. E., NIVEN C. F., Jr PHYSIOLOGY OF THE ENTEROCOCCI AS RELATED TO THEIR TAXONOMY. J Bacteriol. 1963 Dec;86:1275–1282. doi: 10.1128/jb.86.6.1275-1282.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DEIBEL R. H. THE GROUP D STREPTOCOCCI. Bacteriol Rev. 1964 Sep;28:330–366. doi: 10.1128/br.28.3.330-366.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Efthymiou C. J., Joseph S. W. Development of a selective enterococcus medium based on manganese ion deficiency, sodium azide, and alkaline pH. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Sep;28(3):411–416. doi: 10.1128/am.28.3.411-416.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Efthymiou C. J., Joseph S. W. Difference between manganese ion requirements of pediococci and enterococci. J Bacteriol. 1972 Oct;112(1):627–628. doi: 10.1128/jb.112.1.627-628.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Facklam R. R. Comparison of several laboratory media for presumptive identification of enterococci and group D streptococci. Appl Microbiol. 1973 Aug;26(2):138–145. doi: 10.1128/am.26.2.138-145.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Facklam R. R., Moody M. D. Presumptive identification of group D streptococci: the bile-esculin test. Appl Microbiol. 1970 Aug;20(2):245–250. doi: 10.1128/am.20.2.245-250.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Facklam R. R., Padula J. F., Thacker L. G., Wortham E. C., Sconyers B. J. Presumptive identification of group A, B, and D streptococci. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Jan;27(1):107–113. doi: 10.1128/am.27.1.107-113.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hartman P. A., Reinbold G. W., Saraswat D. S. Media and methods for isolation and enumeration of the enterococci. Adv Appl Microbiol. 1966;8:253–289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LANGSTON C. W., GUTIERREZ J., BOUMA C. Motile enterococci (Streptococcus faecium var. mobilis var. n.) isolated from grass silage. J Bacteriol. 1960 Nov;80:714–718. doi: 10.1128/jb.80.5.714-718.1960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lighthart B. Multipoint inoculator system. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Nov;16(11):1797–1798. doi: 10.1128/am.16.11.1797-1798.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MEDREK T. F., BARNES E. M. The influence of the growth medium on the demonstration of a group D antigen in faecal streptococci. J Gen Microbiol. 1962 Sep;28:701–709. doi: 10.1099/00221287-28-4-701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES