Skip to main content
Applied Microbiology logoLink to Applied Microbiology
. 1974 Sep;28(3):439–447. doi: 10.1128/am.28.3.439-447.1974

Studies on the Cecal Microflora of Commercial Broiler Chickens

J P Salanitro 1, I G Blake 1, P A Muirhead 1
PMCID: PMC186739  PMID: 4608322

Abstract

A study was made of the cecal microflora isolated from broilers (5-week-old) reared under typical commercial husbandry conditions. Three hundred and twenty-five bacterial strains (randomly isolated from colonies representing 49 to 81% of the microscopic count) were isolated from cecal digesta of six animals on a rumen fluid roll tube medium (M98-5). Seventy-seven percent of these strains consisted of strict anaerobes: gram-negative, pleomorphic cocci (5.2%), Peptostreptococcus (1.5%), gram-positive rods (36.1% as Propionibacterium acnes and Eubacterium sp.), gram-negative rods (18.6% as Bacteroides clostridiiformis, B. hypermegas and B. fragilis) and sporeforming rods (15.7% as Clostridium sp.). Two types of facultatively anaerobic bacteria (gram-positive cocci and Escherichia coli) were also isolated and constituted 17.5% of the remaining flora. The distribution of the bacterial groups isolated from six cecal samples varied considerably. Data on the growth requirements of anaerobic strains indicated that many could be cultured in a simple medium consisting of an energy source, minerals, reducing agent, Trypticase, and yeast extract (or a vitamin mixture in place of yeast extract). The growth of some of these bacteria was also enhanced by CO2 and rumen fluid. These preliminary data suggest that some of the more numerous anaerobes isolated from the chicken cecum may not require complex nutrients for growth and, in fact, may be nutritionally similar to rumen anaerobes.

Full text

PDF
440

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BAIRD-PARKER A. C. A classification of micrococci and staphylococci based on physiological and biochemical tests. J Gen Microbiol. 1963 Mar;30:409–427. doi: 10.1099/00221287-30-3-409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BRYANT M. P., BURKEY L. A. The characteristics of lactate-fermenting sporeforming anaerobes from silage. J Bacteriol. 1956 Jan;71(1):43–46. doi: 10.1128/jb.71.1.43-46.1956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BRYANT M. P., ROBINSON I. M. Some nutritional characteristics of predominant culturable ruminal bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1962 Oct;84:605–614. doi: 10.1128/jb.84.4.605-614.1962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BRYANT M. P., SMALL N., BOUMA C., CHU H. Bacteroides ruminicola n. sp. and Succinimonas amylolytica; the new genus and species; species of succinic acid-producing anaerobic bacteria of the bovine rumen. J Bacteriol. 1958 Jul;76(1):15–23. doi: 10.1128/jb.76.1.15-23.1958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barnes E. M., Impey C. S. Some properties of the nonsporing anaerobes from poultry caeca. J Appl Bacteriol. 1972 Jun;35(2):241–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1972.tb03696.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barnes E. M., Impey C. S. The isolation and properties of the predominant anaerobic bacteria in the caeca of chickens and turkeys. Br Poult Sci. 1970 Oct;11(4):467–481. doi: 10.1080/00071667008415842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barnes E. M., Mead G. C., Barnum D. A., Harry E. G. The intestinal flora of the chicken in the period 2 to 6 weeks of age, with particular reference to the anaerobic bacteria. Br Poult Sci. 1972 May;13(3):311–326. doi: 10.1080/00071667208415953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bryant M. P., Robinson I. M. Some Nutritional Requirements of the Genus Ruminococcus. Appl Microbiol. 1961 Mar;9(2):91–95. doi: 10.1128/am.9.2.91-95.1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Caldwell D. R., White D. C., Bryant M. P., Doetsch R. N. Specificity of the heme requirement for growth of Bacteroides ruminicola. J Bacteriol. 1965 Dec;90(6):1645–1654. doi: 10.1128/jb.90.6.1645-1654.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dehority B. A. Carbon dioxide requirement of various species of rumen bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1971 Jan;105(1):70–76. doi: 10.1128/jb.105.1.70-76.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Foubert E. L., Douglas H. C. Studies on the Anaerobic Micrococci: I. Taxonomic Considerations. J Bacteriol. 1948 Jul;56(1):25–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. GOLDBERG H. S., BARNES E. M., CHARLES A. B. UNUSUAL BACTEROIDES-LIKE ORGANISM. J Bacteriol. 1964 Mar;87:737–742. doi: 10.1128/jb.87.3.737-742.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. HARRISON A. P., Jr, HANSEN P. A. Bacteroides hypermegas nov. spec. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1963;29:22–28. doi: 10.1007/BF02046035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. LOESCHE W. J., SOCRANSKY S. S., GIBBONS R. J. BACTEROIDES ORALIS, PROPOSED NEW SPECIES ISOLATED FROM THE ORAL CAVITY OF MAN. J Bacteriol. 1964 Nov;88:1329–1337. doi: 10.1128/jb.88.5.1329-1337.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lambert M. A., Moss C. W. Gas-liquid chromatography of short-chain fatty acids on Dexsil 300 GC. J Chromatogr. 1972 Dec 20;74(2):335–338. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(01)86164-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ochi Y., Mitsuoka T., Sega T. Untersuchungen über die Darmflora des Huhnes. III. Die Entwicklung der Darmflora von Küken bis zum Huhn. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig. 1964 Jun;193(1):80–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. SCOTT H. W., DEHORITY B. A. VITAMIN REQUIREMENTS OF SEVERAL CELLULOLYTIC RUMEN BACTERIA. J Bacteriol. 1965 May;89:1169–1175. doi: 10.1128/jb.89.5.1169-1175.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. SMITH H. W. OBSERVATIONS ON THE FLORA OF THE ALIMENTARY TRACT OF ANIMALS AND FACTORS AFFECTING ITS COMPOSITION. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1965 Jan;89:95–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Salanitro J. P., Fairchilds I. G., Zgornicki Y. D. Isolation, culture characteristics, and identification of anaerobic bacteria from the chicken cecum. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Apr;27(4):678–687. doi: 10.1128/am.27.4.678-687.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Timms L. Observations on the bacterial flora of the alimentary tract in three age groups of normal chickens. Br Vet J. 1968 Oct;124(10):470–477. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1935(17)39155-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Varel V. H., Bryant M. P. Nutritional features of Bacteroides fragilis subsp. fragilis. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Aug;28(2):251–257. doi: 10.1128/am.28.2.251-257.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES