Abstract
Progressive renal interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy represent the final injury pathway for all commonly encountered forms of renal disease that lead to end-stage renal failure. It has been recently recognized that myofibroblastic cells are the major contributors to the deposition of interstitial collagens. While there are several potential cellular sources of myofibroblasts, attention has focused on the transformation of the organized tubular epithelium to the myofibroblastic phenotype, a process potently driven both in vitro and in vivo by transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1). Integrity of the underlying basal lamina provides cellular signals that maintain the epithelial phenotype, and disruption by discrete proteases could potentially initiate the transformation process. We demonstrate that TGF-β1 coordinately stimulates the synthesis of a specific matrix metalloproteinase, gelatinase A (MMP-2), and its activator protease, MT1-MMP (MMP-14), and that active gelatinase A is absolutely required for epithelial-mesenchymal transformation induced by TGF-β1. In addition, purified active gelatinase A alone is sufficient to induce epithelial-mesenchymal transformation in the absence of exogenous TGF-β1. Gelatinase A may also mediate epithelial-mesenchymal transformation in a paracrine manner through the proteolytic generation of active TGF-β1 peptide. MT1-MMP and gelatinase A were co-localized to sites of active epithelial-mesenchymal transformation and basal lamina disruption in the rat remnant kidney model of progressive renal fibrosis. These studies indicate that a discrete matrix metalloproteinase, gelatinase A, is capable of inducing the complex genetic rearrangements that characterize renal tubular epithelial-mesenchymal transformation.
Progressive fibrosis and tubular atrophy are the key determinants of end-stage renal disease, regardless of the primary disease process. Additionally, it is well established that interstitial fibrosis has a greater impact on the progression of chronic renal disease than glomerulosclerosis. 1 Tubular injury from primary glomerular disease ensues from interstitial microvascular injury, adaptive tubular hypermetabolism, or proteinuria. Systemic hypertension, hyperfiltration, and glomerular capillary obstruction in glomerular injury also lead to post-glomerular capillary injury and hypoxia. 2-4 In addition, tubular atrophy and loss in glomerular disease results in functional hypermetabolism by the remaining tubules, with increased oxygen consumption. 5
These tubular insults create a hypoxic environment that further contributes to matrix production by tubules and fibroblasts. 6-8 In addition to stimulating collagen synthesis, hypoxia also stimulates expression of growth factors and cytokines including transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, endothelin-1, and angiotensin II, of which TGF-β1 is the most studied. 3,6,9 In cultured renal fibroblasts, TGF-β1 stimulates production of fibronectin and types I, III, and V collagens, while tubular epithelial cells are stimulated to produce proteoglycans and type I, III, IV, and V collagen. 10,11 Numerous studies have demonstrated that renal fibrosis in vivo is associated with elevated TGF-β1 expression. 12 In the Thy1.1 rat model of glomerulonephritis, renal fibrosis was abrogated by administration of anti-TGF-β1 antibody, antisense oligonucleotides, and decorin, a proteoglycan associated with the interstitial matrix and shown to bind TGF-β1. 13-16
It has become increasing evident that myofibroblasts play a central role in the development of renal interstitial fibrosis. Myofibroblasts are mesenchymal cells that express α-smooth muscle actin and are thought to be the predominant source of types I and III collagen in fibrosis. 17 Increased myofibroblast expression in both human disease and animal models has been associated with matrix accumulation and progression of renal disease. 18-28
Despite their importance, the cellular source(s) of renal interstitial myofibroblasts has not been entirely elucidated. While renal myofibroblasts may derive from the intrinsic fibroblastic population or vascular pericytic cells, considerable attention has been devoted recently to the process of tubular epithelial cell (TEC) transformation. In essence, TEC transformation represents a reversal of the mesenchymal-epithelial cell differentiation process characteristic of nephrogenesis. In a study of 5/6 nephrectomized rats, proximal tubule cells were shown to undergo stepwise transformation into α-smooth muscle actin-positive myofibroblasts. 29 Tubular cell expression of α-smooth muscle actin was associated with basement membrane disruption and eventual loss of epithelial morphology with migration into the stroma. Myofibroblasts appeared in areas of fibrosis and adjacent to α-smooth muscle actin-positive tubular cells.
Recently, TGF-β1 was shown to directly induce tubular epithelial-myofibroblast transformation in the NRK-52e normal rat kidney epithelioid cell line in vitro. 30 Yang and Liu 31 subsequently demonstrated that TGF-β1-mediated transformation of cultured tubular epithelial cells was temporally associated with a specifically enhanced expression of gelatinase A. Transgenic mice expressing TGF-β1 develop progressive renal fibrosis with the characteristic features of epithelial-mesenchymal transformation, an event also associated with enhanced synthesis of gelatinase A. 32 Other studies have shown that TGF-β1 stimulates gelatinase A synthesis by cultured fibroblasts and glomerular mesangial cells at both the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. 33,34
Integrity of the underlying basal lamina is required for the maintenance of a polarized epithelial phenotype, and disruption of type IV collagen lattice assembly by addition of a dominant negative α1NC1 domain results in epithelial-mesenchymal transformation. 35 Song et al 36 showed that the epithelial-mesenchymal transformation of endocardial cushions was dependent on gelatinase A activity for penetration and disruption of the underlying type IV collagen-rich basal lamina. Taken together, these observations suggest that the degradation and disruption of the underlying basal lamina by specific matrix metalloproteinases, such as gelatinase A, is a critical component of the epithelial-mesenchymal transformation process. In this report we demonstrate that gelatinase A, in association with the membrane-bound MT1-MMP (MMP-14), is absolutely required for the epithelial-mesenchymal transformation of NRK-52e cells induced by TGF-β1 in vitro. In addition, purified active gelatinase A alone is sufficient to induce epithelial-mesenchymal transformation in these cells without the addition of TGF-β1. Finally, in a model of renal epithelial-mesenchymal transformation and fibrosis, we demonstrate the co-localization of gelatinase A and MT1-MMP by the tubular epithelium at sites of ongoing myofibroblast formation and basal lamina disruption. Taken together, these observations indicate that a single matrix metalloproteinase, gelatinase A, is necessary and sufficient for the induction of the complex genetic rearrangements that characterize epithelial-mesenchymal transformation, a finding of considerable therapeutic potential.
Materials and Methods
Cell Culture
The NRK-52e normal rat tubular epithelioid cell line was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection andmaintained in DME-H21 (Gibco, Rockville, MD) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; Gibco), 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin.
Stimulation Studies
Subconfluent cultures of NRK-52e cells were washed twice in warm phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and given fresh DME-H 21 medium supplemented with 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and the indicated concentrations of TGF-β1 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). For fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis, fresh serum-free medium containing TGF-β1 was replaced after 3 days. Treated cells were analyzed by immunohistochemistry, FACS analysis, quantitative gelatinase zymography, and transfection with gelatinase A and MT1-MMP luciferase reporter constructs as detailed below.
For direct treatment with matrix metalloproteinases, NRK-52e cells were grown to subconfluency, washed with PBS and given fresh serum-free medium containing the denoted concentrations of active and latent gelatinase A or active gelatinase B. Latent gelatinase A was purified to homogeneity from the serum-free conditioned medium of cultured rat glomerular mesangial cells according to the protocol of Okada et al 37 Latent gelatinase B was purified to homogeneity by chromatography of conditioned medium over gelatin-Sepharose and Lens culinaris lectin-agarose as reported in detail. 38 Latent gelatinases were activated by incubation with 0.5 mmol/L p-aminophenylmercuric acetate (confirmed by zymography), dialyzed against PBS, and used at the indicated concentrations.
Inhibition Studies
These studies used a cyclic peptide gelatinase A inhibitor, CTTHWGFTLCGG, isolated by phage display, and a control non-inhibitory peptide, CRAVRALWRCGG. 39 Biotin was added during the synthesis to the terminal G residues to permit immunolocalization (see below). To block TGF-β1-mediated transformation, cells were treated as detailed above in the presence or absence of the indicated concentrations of the inhibitory or control cyclic peptides.
Immunohistochemistry
For identification of myofibroblasts, cells cultured on etched glass coverslips were fixed for 20 minutes at 4°C with 4% buffered paraformaldehyde and permeabilized in acetone. The slips were blocked with 5% normal goat serum for 30 minutes, rinsed, and blocked with an avidin/biotin kit (Vector, Burlingame, MA). Rinsed coverslips were incubated with primary monoclonal mouse α-smooth muscle actin antibody (Sigma, St. Louis, MO; 6.5 mg/ml) at 1:50 in 0.1% BSA/PBS for 2 hours at room temperature, followed by biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgG (Zymed, San Francisco, CA; 0.4 mg/ml) at 1:20 in 0.1% BSA/PBS for 2 hours at room temperature. Rinsed slips were incubated with either streptavidin-rhodamine or streptavidin-fluorescein (0.5 μg/ml, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) at 1:100 in 0.1% BSA/PBS for 30 minutes.
For co-localization of α-SMA and active gelatinase A, cells were fixed in 2% buffered paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes, blocked with avidin/biotin and incubated with the biotinylated cyclic peptides (inhibitory or control) at 5 μg/ml for 1 hour at 4°C, followed by a 1:200 dilution of streptavidin-rhodamine for 30 minutes. Rinsed cells were re-fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 90 seconds, and blocked with 5% normal donkey serum for 30 minutes (Vector). This was followed by monoclonal anti-α-SMA antibody at 1:50 for 2 hours at room temperature and fluorescein-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) at 1:100 for 2 hours at room temperature.
To co-localize active gelatinase A and MT1-MMP, the same protocol as above was followed until after the second fixation. Cells were blocked with 5% normal goat serum, followed by avidin/biotin blockade. Murine monoclonal α-MT1-MMP antibody (Oncogene Research Products, San Diego, CA) was used at 1:50 dilution for 2 hours at room temperature, followed by biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgG (Zymed, 0.4 mg/ml) at 1:200 dilution for 2 hours, and finally with streptavidin-fluorescein (Vector) at 1:100 for 30 minutes at room temperature.
For co-localization of MT1-MMP and E-cadherin, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, blocked with PBS/CMF with 5% BSA followed by avidin/biotin. Murine monoclonal α-MT1-MMP IgG3 and murine α-E-cadherin IgG2a (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY) were used at 1:50 (2 μg/ml) and 1:50 (2.5 μg/ml), respectively, for 3 hours. The cells were then incubated with biotinylated rat α-IgG3 (CalTag, Burlingame, CA) and FITC-conjugated rat α-IgG2a (Caltag) at 1:200 (2 μg/ml) and 1:50 (8 μg/ml), respectively, followed by streptavidin-rhodamine at 1:200 (2 μg/ml). For control experiments, murine monoclonal α-MT1-MMP IgG3 was incubated with FITC-conjugated rat α-IgG2a, and murine α-E-cadherin IgG2a with biotinylated rat α-IgG3 and streptavidin-rhodamine.
Ionomycin Studies
NRK-52e cells were incubated with TGF-β1 (2 ng/ml) along with 0, 100, or 500 nmol/L ionomycin (Sigma) for 48 hours in serum-free medium. Cells were then prepared and stained for α-SMA as described above.
Activation of Latent TGF-β1 by Gelatinase A
Eighty percent confluent cultures of NRK-52e cells were incubated with the indicated concentrations of active gelatinase A for 3 days in Optimem (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The conditioned medium was harvested and measured for active TGF-β1 by ELISA (R&D Systems). Data are expressed as means of quadruplicate determinations ± 1 SD of pg active TGF-β1/100 μg cell layer protein.
Immunohistochemistry of Remnant Kidney
Male Munich Wistar rats (275 to 350 × g) were subjected to 5/6 renal ablation (n = 6) or a sham operation (n = 6) consisting of laparotomy and manipulation of the renal pedicle as reported. 40 Kidneys were harvested for analysis at 10 weeks when segmental sclerosis and tubulointerstitial fibrosis are present. At the time of harvest, animals were anesthetized with pentobarbital, the kidneys perfusion-fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, and embedded in paraffin. Deparaffinized 5-micron sections were hydrated, endogenous peroxidase blocked by incubation for 30 minutes with 0.1% H2O2, followed by incubation with 5% normal goat serum and avidin/biotin blocking solution. Monoclonal anti-α-smooth muscle actin antibody (1:400), anti-gelatinase A antibody (1:500, Oncogene Research), or anti-MT1-MMP (1:500, Oncogene Research) were applied for 60 minutes at room temperature, followed by the Vectastain Elite ABC kit (Vector) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Development with DAB/NiCl2 and counterstaining with methyl green were performed using standard methodology.
FACS Analysis
Cells in the respective treatment groups were released with trypsin, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes, and permeabilized with 0.2% saponin for 10 minutes at 4°C. Cells were then stained with monoclonal anti-α-SMA antibody and fluorescein-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG as detailed above and analyzed by FACS (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) with histograms of 10,000 counts, using excitation of 488 nm and emission of 530 nm.
Quantitative Gelatin Zymography
Crude (gelatinase A) and Triton-X114-extracted (MT1-MMP) microsomes from control and TGF-β1-treated cells were prepared as reported in detail. 41 Equal concentrations of microsomal protein (15 μg/lane) were loaded on 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gels containing 2 mg/ml gelatin and separated by electrophoresis. Processing of gels was as reported. 34 Experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated at least three times. The major enzymatic activities at 66 (gelatinase A) and 62 (MT1-MMP) kd were quantified by laser densitometry and standardized using serial dilution of known quantities of purified gelatinase A or MT1-MMP.
Transient Transfection with Gelatinase A and MT1-MMP Luciferase Reporter Constructs
Subconfluent cultures of NRK-52e cells were washed and transfected with FuGene (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) using 1 μg of plasmid DNA from the control pGL2-Basic luciferase reporter plasmid (Promega, Madison, WI), plasmid pT4-Luc1686 (composed of the first 1686 bp of the rat gelatinase A 5′ flanking region cloned into pGL2-Basic), or plasmid pMT1-Luc3280 (composed of the first 3280 bp of the murine MT1-MMP 5′ flanking region). Sixteen to 24 hours after transfection, fresh medium was added in the presence or absence of 2 ng/ml TGF-β1 and the incubation continued for a further 24 hours. Cells were washed, extracted with 400 μl Triton lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 1 mmol/L dithiothreitol, 25 mmol/L glycylglycine at pH 7.8, 15 mmol/L MgSO4), and followed by measurement of luciferase and galactosidase activities as reported. 42 All transfections were performed in quadruplicate and repeated at least three times. Transfection results are graphed and expressed as means ± 1 SD.
Statistical Analyses
Statistical significance was determined for paired comparisons using Student’s t-test or by analysis of variance for multiple comparisons where appropriate.
Results
These studies used the well-characterized rat renal tubular epithelial cell line, NRK-52e, which is generally considered to be of proximal tubular origin. 43,44 Prior reports by Fan et al 30 demonstrated that TGF-β1 induces transdifferentiation of NRK-52e epithelial cells to a mesenchymal phenotype characterized by α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) expression and migration. The effects of TGF-β1 are time and concentration dependent. As summarized in Figure 1 ▶ , treatment of NRK-52e cells with 2 ng/ml TGF-β1 for 3 days induced α-SMA expression and a migratory phenotype (Figure 1, A and B) ▶ . Notably, α-SMA expression is limited to the subset of cells at the periphery of the epithelial clusters of NRK-52e cells. As detailed in Figure 1, C and D ▶ , the subset of α-SMA+ cells also concurrently expressed MT1-MMP protein as determined by immunohistochemistry. Using a biotinylated cyclic peptide, CTTHWGFTLCGG, as a probe for activated gelatinase A, dual immunohistochemical techniques demonstrated the co-localization of the MT1-MMP and active gelatinase A proteins on the cells at the migratory front of the TGF-β1-treated cells (Figure 1, E and F) ▶ . As shown in Figure 1, G and H ▶ , the active gelatinase A protein is clustered at specific sites on the leading and trailing edges of the transdifferentiated cells, consistent with a direct role in cellular migration.
Figure 1.
TGF-β1 induces the myofibroblastic phenotype with concurrent expression of MT1-MMP and active gelatinase A. Cultured NRK-52e cells were incubated in the presence (panels B–H) or absence (A) of 2 ng/ml TGF-β1 for 3 days followed by immunohistochemical analysis. A: Control cells stained for α-SMA. B: TGF-β1-treated cells stained for α-SMA showing intense expression at the migratory front. C and D: Dual immunohistochemical staining for α-SMA (C) and MT1-MMP (D) of TGF-β1-treated cells showing co localization of expression in the migratory front. E and F: Dual immunohistochemical staining for MT1-MMP (E) and active gelatinase A (F) of TGF-β1-treated cells showing co localization of enzyme proteins. G and H: Normarski optics (G) of TGF-β1-treated cells demonstrating migratory phenotype with acquisition of myofibroblastic morphology. H: Same cells demonstrating localization of active gelatinase A protein on the leading and trailing edges of the cells. (Magnification, ×500).
The extent of cell-cell contact appeared to regulate the expression of MT1-MMP induced by TGF-β1. As shown in Figure 2 ▶ , cells with intact E-cadherin complexes did not express MT1-MMP, while cells with disrupted complexes did.
Figure 2.
Cell-cell contact regulates TGF-β1-mediated induction of MT1-MMP. NRK-52e cells were cultured for 3 days with TGF-β1 (2 ng/ml) followed by dual immunohistochemical staining for E-cadherin (A) and MT1-MMP (B). Arrows in A denote sites of cell-cell contact with cadherin complexes. (Magnification, ×700).
To quantify the extent of gelatinase A and MT1-MMP induction by TGF-β1, NRK-52e cells were incubated for 3 days with 2 ng/ml TGF-β1 in serum-free medium, followed by quantitative gelatin zymography of the culture supernatants (gelatinase A) or Triton-X114 membrane extracts (MT1-MMP). Under these conditions, TGF-β1 increased the synthesis of both gelatinase A and MT1-MMP by nearly threefold. (Figure 3, A) ▶ . The increases in gelatinase A and MT1-MMP protein synthesis are, at least in part, due to increased rates of transcription following treatment with TGF-β1. To demonstrate this, NRK-52e cells were transiently transfected with luciferase reporter constructs containing 1686 or 3280 bp of the 5′ flanking regions of the gelatinase A or MT1-MMP promoters, respectively (Figure 3B) ▶ . Gelatinase A transcription rates under these conditions were stimulated over twofold by TGF-β1, while MT1-MMP transcription rates were increased by nearly fivefold.
Figure 3.
TGF-β1 induces MT1-MMP and gelatinase A synthesis and transcription. NRK-52e cells were treated with 2 ng/ml TGF-β1 for 3 days followed by quantitative analysis of MT1-MMP and gelatinase A protein synthesis and transcription as detailed in Materials and Methods. A: Quantitative zymography of controls and TGF-β1-treated cells demonstrated an approximate threefold increase in both MT1-MMP and gelatinase A protein synthesis. B: TGF-β1 induces an approximate twofold increase in gelatinase A transcriptional activity as measured with the promoter-luciferase construct, pT4-Luc1686, and a nearly fivefold increase in MT1-MMP transcriptional activity using the promoter-luciferase construct pMT1-Luc3280.
The localization of active gelatinase A to the specific cellular sites of NRK-52e transformation induced by TGF-β1 suggested that gelatinase A may be the final common mediator of this process. To directly test this hypothesis, NRK-52e cells were incubated for 72 hours with varying concentrations of active or latent purified gelatinase A, followed by assessment of transformation by staining for α-SMA. The results of these studies are summarized in Figure 4 ▶ . Concentrations of active gelatinase A as low as 10 nmol/L were sufficient to induce NRK-52e transformation and affected virtually 100% of the cells when a concentration of 50 nmol/L was used (Figure 4, B–D) ▶ . In contrast, 50 nmol/L of latent gelatinase A had no effect on NRK-52e transformation (Figure 4E) ▶ , consistent with a requirement for enzymatic activity. Zymographic analysis of NRK-52e culture supernates indicated that the only other MMP family member synthesized by this cell type is gelatinase B or MMP-9 (not shown). Addition of 50 nmol/L activated purified gelatinase B had no effect on NRK-52e transdifferentiation (Figure 4F) ▶ , indicating a specific requirement for a gelatinase A-specific enzymatic activity for this process.
Figure 4.
Active gelatinase A induces NRK-52e transdifferentiation. Purified active gelatinase A in concentrations ranging from 0, 10, 25, and 50 nmol/L (A–D, respectively) were added to cultured NRK-52e cells for 72 hours, followed by immunohistochemical staining for α-SMA. There is an evident concentration-dependent increase in α-SMA expression. Addition of 50 nmol/L of latent gelatinase A (E) did not induce α-SMA expression, nor did addition of 50 nmol/L active gelatinase B (F). (Magnification, ×500).
To further demonstrate the absolute requirement of gelatinase A activity for TGF-β1-mediated transformation, NRK-52e cells were incubated for 72 hours with TGF-β1 (2 ng/ml) in the presence of increasing concentrations of the gelatinase A cyclic peptide inhibitor, CTTHWGFTLCGG, or with a control cyclic peptide, CRAVRALWRCGG, followed by staining for α-SMA. The results of these experiments are summarized in Figure 5 ▶ . Addition of increasing concentrations of the gelatinase A cyclic peptide inhibitor significantly decreased cellular staining for α-SMA beginning at concentrations of 25 μmol/L and greater, while the control cyclic peptide at 100 μmol/L concentration had no effect on TGF-β1-mediated α-SMA expression. The concentrations of the cyclic peptide gelatinase A inhibitor required for blockade of α-SMA expression are in the same range required for inhibition of enzymatic activity (IC50 ∼10 μmol/L) as determined in Koivunen et al 39 It should be noted in this context that the cyclic peptide gelatinase A inhibitor has no effect on the activity of MT1-MMP. 39
Figure 5.
A specific gelatinase A inhibitor blocks TGF-β1-mediated NRK-52e transformation. NRK-52e cells were treated with 2 ng/ml TGF-β1 in the presence of concentrations of the cyclic peptide inhibitor, CTTHWGFTLCGG, ranging from 0, 10, 25, 50, and 100 μmol/L (A–E, respectively). Cells in F were treated with 100 μmol/L of the control cyclic peptide, CRAVRALWRCGG. Expression of α-SMA is significantly inhibited by concentrations of the cyclic peptide gelatinase A inhibitor above 25 μmol/L, while the control peptide had no significant effect on α-SMA expression. (Magnification, ×500).
The data summarized in Figures 1 through 5 ▶ are consistent with a TGF-β1-mediated coordinated synthesis of MT1-MMP and gelatinase A, membrane assembly of the MT1-MMP/gelatinase A complex, and induction of transformation through the localized proteolytic action of gelatinase A. This suggests that the presentation of active MT1-MMP on the cell surface is a critical regulatory step in the assembly of the complete proteolytic complex. Yu et al 45 and Lehti et al 46 demonstrated that calcium influx mediated by ionomycin blocked the conversion of pro-MT1-MMP to the active 60 kd form. To evaluate the importance of assembly of the MT1-MMP/gelatinase A complex for induction of transformation, NRK-52e cells were incubated with TGF-β1 (2 ng/ml) along with ionomycin (0, 100, and 500 nmol/L) for 48 hours, followed by assessment of α-SMA expression. The results of these experiments are summarized in Figure 6 ▶ and demonstrate that inclusion of ionomycin effectively blocks the development of TGF-β1-mediated transformation, as assessed by α-SMA expression. These experiments demonstrate that TGF-β1-mediated transformation is dependent on the coordinated presentation of active MT1-MMP on the cell surface, thereby permitting assembly of the MT1-MMP/gelatinase A proteolytic complex.
Figure 6.
Calcium ionophore blocks TGF-β1-mediated NRK-52e transformation. Cells were treated with TGF-β1 (2 ng/ml) for 48 hours in the absence (A) or presence of ionomycin (100 and 500 nmol/L, B and C, respectively) followed by staining for α-SMA. (Magnification, ×600).
As several of the studies summarized above are expressed in terms of qualitative histochemistry, a further set of experiments was performed using FACS measurement of α-SMA to assess in a quantitative manner the transformation status of the NRK-52e cells. As summarized in Figure 7 ▶ , treatment of NRK-52e cells with 50 nmol/L active gelatinase A results in a significant increase in measured α-SMA expression, while latent gelatinase A had no effect (Figure 7A) ▶ . This effect of gelatinase A on α-SMA expression is concentration-dependent (Figure 7B) ▶ , and could not be reproduced by incubation with 50 nmol/L activated gelatinase B (not shown). Finally, inclusion of 100 μmol/L of the specific gelatinase A cyclic peptide inhibitor completely blocked TGF-β1-mediated α-SMA expression (Figure 7C) ▶ .
Figure 7.
Quantitative FACS analysis of α-SMA expression by NRK-52e cells. A: Cells were treated for 72 hours with control medium, 50 nmol/L latent gelatinase A or 50 nmol/L active gelatinase A. FACS analysis demonstrates a highly significant increase in α-SMA expression in the group treated with active gelatinase A, but not in the controls or in cells treated with latent gelatinase A. B: A gelatinase A concentration-dependent increase in α-SMA expression is demonstrated. C: Inclusion of 100 μmol/L of the gelatinase A cyclic peptide inhibitor blocked TGF-β1-mediated NRK-52e transdifferentiation as determined by α-SMA expression.
Gelatinase A secreted by cultured hepatocellular carcinoma cells has been recently shown to convert latent TGF-β1 to active TGF-β1 by cleavage of latency-associated peptide. 47 To determine whether a similar process was operative within the context of NRK52e cells, cultures were incubated for 72 hours in serum-free medium with active gelatinase A. Exposure to 10 nmol/L and 50 nmol/L active gelatinase A increased the content of active TGF-β1 peptide in the supernates by 28 and 94%, respectively (Figure 8) ▶ . Thus, gelatinase A may further facilitate the development of the transformation process by the paracrine generation of additional biologically active TGF-β1 peptide.
Figure 8.
Gelatinase A generates active TGF-β1 peptide. Cultured NRK-52e cells were maintained for 3 days in serum-free medium with concentrations of active gelatinase A ranging from 0 to 50 nmol/L. Levels of active TGF-β1 peptide were determined by ELISA and expressed as the mean ± 1 SD/100 μg cell layer protein. (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01)
Ng et al 29 recently demonstrated tubular epithelial-myofibroblast transformation in the rat 5/6 nephrectomy model of renal fibrosis. To correlate our in vitro studies with NRK-52e cells to this model, immunohistochemical staining for α-SMA, gelatinase A, and MT1-MMP was performed using specific monoclonal antibodies. Representative results (n = 6 for each group) are shown in Figures 9–11 ▶ . At 10 weeks following sham surgery, there was minimal observable staining for α-SMA in renal cortical sections (Figure 9A) ▶ , as well as gelatinase A and MT1-MMP (Figure 9, B and C) ▶ . In contrast, renal cortical sections from rats subjected to 5/6 nephrectomy for 10 weeks revealed dramatic changes in structure, with extensive glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis, tubular dropout, and dilation of remnant tubular structures. Intense staining for α-SMA was evident within the glomeruli and sites of interstitial fibrosis, and was particularly prominent in the tubular epithelial cells lining the dilated tubules (Figure 10A) ▶ . Intense staining in tubular epithelia of dilated tubules was also observed for both MT1-MMP and gelatinase A proteins (Figure 10, B and C) ▶ . Staining for all three proteins was particularly intense at foci of myofibroblastic proliferation and migration through disrupted tubular basement membranes (Figure 11, A–C ▶ , respectively). The results of the histochemical studies were confirmed by Western blots of renal cortical extracts, in which levels of SMA-actin, gelatinase A, and MT1-MMP proteins were greatly increased at 10 weeks as compared to controls (not shown). In conjunction with our in vitro data, the 5/6 nephrectomy studies provide compelling evidence that during the acquisition of the α-SMA+ phenotype, tubular epithelial cells co-express MT1-MMP and gelatinase A, thereby driving the transition to the proliferative and migratory myofibroblast.
Figure 9.
Immunohistochemical staining of sham-operated rat renal cortical tissues. There is no significant staining for α-SMA, MT1-MMP, or gelatinase A (A–C, respectively). (Magnification, ×200).
Figure 10.
Immunohistochemical staining at 6 weeks following 5/6 nephrectomy. There is extensive tubular atrophy and dropout, associated with interstitial fibrosis and glomerular segmental sclerosis. Staining for α-SMA (A) is notable within the sclerotic glomeruli, interstitium and in the tubular epithelial cells of the dilated tubules (arrowheads). There is a virtually identical pattern of staining for MT1-MMP (B), and gelatinase A (C), which is very intense within the tubular epithelial cells of dilated tubules (arrowheads). (Magnification, ×200).
Figure 11.
Concordant expression of α-SMA, MT1-MMP, and gelatinase A at sites of tubular epithelial cell proliferation and basal lamina disruption at 6 weeks following 5/6 nephrectomy. Clusters of proliferating tubular epithelial cells undergoing transdifferentiation concordantly express α-SMA (A), MT1-MMP (B), and gelatinase A (C). (Magnification, ×350).
Discussion
The transformation (or transdifferentiation) of epithelial cells to a mesenchymal or fibroblastic phenotype is a critical feature of tissue morphogenesis. 48 Epithelial-mesenchymal transformation also plays a central role in the development of neoplasia in epithelial tissues and has been extensively analyzed in the evolution of breast and colonic carcinomas. 49-53 Tissue fibrosis occurring as a consequence of epithelial-mesenchymal transformation has been demonstrated for pulmonary, hepatic, and renal diseases, and an extensive body of evidence has highlighted TGF-β1 as the dominant peptide mediator of this process. 17,30,48,54-57 The conversion of highly polarized epithelial cell structures with prominent cell-cell and cell-matrix attachments to a migratory, non-polarized phenotype characterized by limited cell-cell interaction is associated with profound rearrangements in multiple cellular systems. For example, a transcriptome screen of TGF-β1-treated epidermal cells undergoing epithelial-mesenchymal transition suggested that nearly 10% of all expressed genes (∼4000) manifested significant changes in expression levels. 58 Pathway mapping and functional module assessment demonstrated major changes in the expression levels of genes in signaling cascades, cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, motility, and mesenchymal development. 58 The remarkable complexity of the genetic consequences of TGF-β1-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transformation underscores the significance of this study, in which a single, TGF-β1-dependent gene product, gelatinase A, was found to be both necessary and sufficient for the epithelial-mesenchymal transformation of renal tubular epithelial cells.
Enzymatically active gelatinase A was required for the induction of tubular epithelial cell transformation and this effect could not be recapitulated using the closely related gelatinase B (MMP-9). While both enzymes are similar in terms of protein structure, they manifest discrete patterns of substrate specificity. Gelatinase B has a higher degree of activity for types IV and V collagens, while gelatinase A can additionally degrade fibronectin and laminins. 59,60 MT1-MMP, first identified as the cell-surface associated activator of gelatinase A, also exhibits catalytic activity against several extracellular matrix proteins, including native types I and III collagens, laminin, and fibronectin. 61-66 Notably, recombinant MT1-MMMP has no activity against type IV collagen. 67 While all three enzymes cleave the canonical Pro-X-X-/-XHy peptide sequence characteristic of collagenous substrates, Smith and colleagues 68-70 have recently demonstrated that gelatinase A, gelatinase B, and MT1-MMP have additional defined substrate recognition motifs unique to each enzyme. These observations suggest that the absolute requirement for gelatinase A in renal tubular epithelial-mesenchymal transformation, as opposed to gelatinase B or MT1-MMP (note the cyclic peptide inhibitor used in this study does not inhibit MT1-MMP), presumably reflects enzyme-specific cleavage of heretofore undefined target substrates. Gelatinase A may also amplify the transformation process in a paracrine manner through the proteolytic generation of active TGF-β1 peptide.
Treatment of defined extracellular matrix substrates with purified or recombinant matrix metalloproteinases has demonstrated the release of cryptic, biologically active cleavage products. For example, Xu et al 71 exposed a cryptic site with type IV collagen by digestion with gelatinase A. The cryptic fragment induced mobility of cultured endothelial cells and co-localized with active gelatinase A at sites of angiogenesis. Giannelli et al 60 demonstrated that gelatinase A cleavage of laminin-5, a major component of the tubular basement membrane, releases a cryptic domain from the γ2 subunit that promotes breast epithelial cell migration. Recently, Gilles et al 49 found that MT1-MMP was also capable of releasing the γ2 subunit fragment. In each of these studies, the γ2 subunit stimulated cellular migration without evidence for a complete epithelial-mesenchymal transformation. Thus, one potential mechanism of action for gelatinase A-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transformation could be the generation of specific biologically active extracellular matrix cleavage products.
Enzymatic disruption of cell-cell or cell-matrix attachments has been suggested as an alternative mechanism for induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transformation. Induction of stromelysin-1 expression in the murine mammary epithelial cell line SCp2 triggers a mesenchymal conversion associated with loss of E-cadherin and disruption of cell-cell contacts. 72 In contrast, integrin alterations were relatively insignificant, suggesting that within the cellular context of this system that disruption of cell-matrix interactions is not a major driving force in the transformation process. Ho et al 73 used matrix metalloproteinase inhibition to investigate the relative roles of cell-cell and cell-matrix interaction. MMP inhibition resulted in stabilization of cell-cell contracts with redistribution of p125FAK to sites of contact. In addition, MMP inhibition resulted in increased cadherin levels and augmented calcium-dependent cellular aggregation. Based on these findings, it was proposed that MMP inhibitors act to stabilize both cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions.
TGF-β1 induced the synthesis of both gelatinase A and MT1-MMP, and transcriptional reporter studies indicate that at least one component of the enhanced synthesis of these enzymes is the consequence of transcriptional activation. The proximal promoters of both these genes include functional overlapping Sp1/Sp3 (gelatinase A) 74 and Sp1/Egr-1 (MT1-MMP) 75 sites and the increases in transcriptional activity of these promoters by TGF-β1 may be the consequence of the recently reported interaction of Smad3/Smad4 proteins with Sp-1. 76-78 This interaction, as a coordinated mechanism for TGF-β1 transcriptional regulation of these two genes, is currently under investigation.
Notably, only a subset of the NRK52e cells exposed to TGF-β1 manifested the changes characteristic of the epithelial-mesenchymal transformation. These cells were located on the periphery of the typical epithelial growth islands of the NRK52e cells at sites of active proliferation and had diminished staining for E-cadherin and loss of cell-cell contacts, as opposed to the cells within the middle of the growth islands. E-cadherin has been recently shown to suppress MT1-MMP transcription by suppression of MAP kinase (ERK) activity, suggesting that stabilization of cadherin-dependent cell-cell interaction prevents MT1-MMP expression, gelatinase A activation, and initiation of the epithelial-mesenchymal transformation. 79
Given the fact that the epithelial-mesenchymal transformation of tubular epithelial cells displays an absolute requirement for enzymatically active gelatinase A and the recent demonstration that there are uniquely specific cleavage consensus motifs for this enzyme, 70 we are examining defined subsets of cell-associated and extracellular matrix proteins for the existence of such motifs to assemble a list of candidate target proteins. These efforts may be expected to provide further insight into the precise means by which gelatinase A triggers the epithelial-mesenchymal transformation. Nonetheless, the determination that the blockade of a single matrix metalloproteinase is sufficient to halt the renal tubular epithelial cell transformation program has major clinical implications. The crystallization of gelatinase A and the determination of enzyme-specific substrates will facilitate the development of specific gelatinase A inhibitors suitable for testing in vitro and in animal models of renal transdifferentiation. 70,80 Gelatinase A-specific inhibition may potentially offer a novel approach for the treatment of progressive renal fibrosis.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Tim Meyer, Stanford University, for his assistance with the 5/6 nephrectomy rats and Dr. Suneel Apte, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, for providing the MT1-MMP genomic construct.
Footnotes
Address reprint requests to David H. Lovett, 111J Medical Service, SFVAMC, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA 94121. E-mail: david.lovett@med.va.gov.
Supported by NIH grants DK 39776 to D.H.L. and K08 DK59383–01 to S.C.
References
- 1.Mackensen-Haen S, Bohle A, Christensen J, Wehrmann M, Kendziorra H, Kokot F: The consequences for renal function of widening of the interstitium and changes in the tubular epithelium of the renal cortex and outer medulla in various renal diseases. Clin Nephrol 1992, 37:70-77 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fine LG, Ong AC, Norman JT: Mechanisms of tubulo-interstitial injury in progressive renal diseases Eur J Clin Invest 1993, 23:259-265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fine LG, Orphanides C, Norman JT: Progressive renal disease: the chronic hypoxia hypothesis. Kidney Int Suppl 1998, 65:S74-S78 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bohle A, von Gise H, Mackensen-Haen S, Stark-Jakob B: The obliteration of the post-glomerular capillaries and its influence upon the function of both glomeruli and tubuli: functional interpretation of morphologic findings. Klin Wochenschr 1981, 59:1043-1051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Harris DC, Chan L, Schrier RW: Remnant kidney hypermetabolism and progression of chronic renal failure Am J Physiol 1988, 254:F267-F276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Orphanides C, Fine LG, Norman JT: Hypoxia stimulates proximal tubular cell matrix production via a TGF-β1-independent mechanism Kidney Int 1997, 52:637-647 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Falanga V, Martin TA, Takagi H, Kirsner RS, Helfman T, Pardes J, Ochoa MS: Low oxygen tension increases mRNA levels of α 1 (I) procollagen in human dermal fibroblasts J Cell Physiol 1993, 157:408-412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Agocha A, Lee HW, Eghbali-Webb M: Hypoxia regulates basal and induced DNA synthesis and collagen type I production in human cardiac fibroblasts: effects of transforming growth factor-β1, thyroid hormone, angiotensin II, and basic fibroblast growth factor. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1997, 29:2233-2244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Miller RL, Kohan DE: Hypoxia regulates endothelin-1 production by the inner medullary collecting duct J Lab Clin Med 1998, 131:45-48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Alvarez RJ, Sun MJ, Haverty TP, Iozzo RV, Myers JC, Neilson EG: Biosynthetic and proliferative characteristics of tubulointerstitial fibroblasts probed with paracrine cytokines Kidney Int 1992, 41:14-23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Creely JJ, DiMari SJ, Howe AM, Haralson MA: Effects of transforming growth factor-β on collagen synthesis by normal rat kidney epithelial cells Am J Pathol 1992, 140:45-55 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Border WA, Noble NA: TGF-β in kidney fibrosis: a target for gene therapy. Kidney Int 1997, 51:1388-1396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Border WA, Okuda S, Languino LR, Sporn MB, Ruoslahti E: Suppression of experimental glomerulonephritis by antiserum against transforming growth factor-β 1 Nature 1990, 346:371-374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Akagi Y, Isaka Y, Arai M, Kaneko T, Takenaka M, Moriyama T, Kaneda Y, Ando A, Orita Y, Kamada T, Ueda N, Imai E: Inhibition of TGF-β 1 expression by antisense oligonucleotides suppressed extracellular matrix accumulation in experimental glomerulonephritis Kidney Int 1996, 50:148-155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Border WA, Noble NA, Yamamoto T, Harper JR, Yamaguchi Y, Pierschbacher MD, Ruoslahti E: Natural inhibitor of transforming growth factor-β protects against scarring in experimental kidney disease Nature 1992, 360:361-364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Isaka Y, Brees DK, Ikegaya K, Kaneda Y, Imai E, Noble NA, Border WA: Gene therapy by skeletal muscle expression of decorin prevents fibrotic disease in rat kidney. Nat Med 1996, 2:418-423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Weber KT: Fibrosis, a common pathway to organ failure: angiotensin II and tissue repair. Semin Nephrol 1997, 17:467-491 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Goumenos DS, Brown CB, Shortland J, el Nahas AM: Myofibroblasts, predictors of progression of mesangial IgA nephropathy? Nephrol Dial Transplant 1994, 9:1418-1425 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Roberts IS, Burrows C, Shanks JH, Venning M, McWilliam LJ: Interstitial myofibroblasts: predictors of progression in membranous nephropathy. J Clin Pathol 1997, 50:123-127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Alpers CE, Hudkins KL, Gown AM, Johnson RJ: Enhanced expression of “muscle-specific” actin in glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int 1992, 41:1134-1142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Alpers CE, Hudkins KL, Floege J, Johnson RJ: Human renal cortical interstitial cells with some features of smooth muscle cells participate in tubulointerstitial and crescentic glomerular injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 1994, 5:201-209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.MacPherson BR, Leslie KO, Lizaso KV, Schwarz JE: Contractile cells of the kidney in primary glomerular disorders: an immunohistochemical study using an anti-α-smooth muscle actin monoclonal antibody. Hum Pathol 1993, 24:710-716 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Diamond JR, van Goor H, Ding G, Engelmyer E: Myofibroblasts in experimental hydronephrosis. Am J Pathol 1995, 146:121-129 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Essawy M, Soylemezoglu O, Muchaneta-Kubara EC, Shortland J, Brown CB, el Nahas AM: Myofibroblasts and the progression of diabetic nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1997, 12:43-50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang G, Moorhead P, el Nahas A: Myofibroblasts and the progression of experimental glomerulonephritis. Exp Nephrol 1995, 3:308-318 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hewitson TD, Becker GJ: Interstitial myofibroblasts in IgA glomerulonephritis. Am J Nephrol 1995, 15:111-117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hewitson TD, Wu HL, Becker GJ: Interstitial myofibroblasts in experimental renal infection and scarring. Am J Nephrol 1995, 15:411-417 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Johnson RJ, Alpers CE, Yoshimura A, Lombardi D, Pritzl P, Floege J, Schwartz SM: Renal injury from angiotensin II-mediated hypertension. Hypertension 1992, 19:464-474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ng YY, Huang TP, Yang WC, Chen ZP, Yang AH, Mu W, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Atkins RC, Lan HY: Tubular epithelial-myofibroblast transdifferentiation in progressive tubulointerstitial fibrosis in 5/6 nephrectomized rats. Kidney Int 1998, 54:864-876 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fan JM, Ng YY, Hill PA, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Mu W, Atkins RC, Lan HY: Transforming growth factor-β regulates tubular epithelial-myofibroblast transdifferentiation in vitro. Kidney Int 1999, 56:1455-1467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yang J, Liu Y: Dissection of key events in tubular epithelial to myofibroblast transition and its implications in renal interstitial fibrosis. Am J Pathol 2001, 159:1465-1475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kopp JB, Factor VM, Mozes M, Nagy P, Sanderson N, Bottinger EP, Klotman PE, Thorgeirsson SS: Transgenic mice with increased plasma levels of TGF-β 1 develop progressive renal disease. Lab Invest 1996, 74:991-1003 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Overall CM, Wrana JL, Sodek J: Transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of 72-kDa gelatinase/type IV collagenase by transforming growth factor-β 1 in human fibroblasts: comparisons with collagenase and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase gene expression. J Biol Chem 1991, 266:14064-14071 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Marti HP, Lee L, Kashgarian M, Lovett DH: Transforming growth factor-β 1 stimulates glomerular mesangial cell synthesis of the 72-kd type IV collagenase. Am J Pathol 1994, 144:82-94 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zeisberg M, Bonner G, Maeshima Y, Colorado P, Muller GA, Strutz F, Kalluri R: Renal fibrosis: collagen composition and assembly regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transdifferentiation. Am J Pathol 2001, 159:1313-1321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Song W, Jackson K, McGuire PG: Degradation of type IV collagen by matrix metalloproteinases is an important step in the epithelial-mesenchymal transformation of the endocardial cushions. Dev Biol 2000, 227:606-617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Okada Y, Morodomi T, Enghild JJ, Suzuki K, Yasui A, Nakanishi I, Salvesen G, Nagase H: Matrix metalloproteinase 2 from human rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts: purification and activation of the precursor and enzymic properties. Eur J Biochem 1990, 194:721-730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.McMillan JI, Riordan JW, Couser WG, Pollock AS, Lovett DH: Characterization of a glomerular epithelial cell metalloproteinase as matrix metalloproteinase-9 with enhanced expression in a model of membranous nephropathy. J Clin Invest 1996, 97:1094-1101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Koivunen E, Arap W, Valtanen H, Rainisalo A, Medina OP, Heikkila P, Kantor C, Gahmberg CG, Salo T, Konttinen YT, Sorsa T, Ruoslahti E, Pasqualini R: Tumor targeting with a selective gelatinase inhibitor. Nature Biotechnol 1999, 17:768-774 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lee LK, Meyer TW, Pollock AS, Lovett DH: Endothelial cell injury initiates glomerular sclerosis in the rat remnant kidney. J Clin Invest 1995, 96:953-964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Turck J, Pollock AS, Lee LK, Marti HP, Lovett DH: Matrix metalloproteinase 2 (gelatinase A) regulates glomerular mesangial cell proliferation and differentiation. J Biol Chem 1996, 271:15074-15083 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mertens PR, Harendza S, Pollock AS, Lovett DH: Glomerular mesangial cell-specific transactivation of matrix metalloproteinase 2 transcription is mediated by YB-1. J Biol Chem 1997, 272:22905-22912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Suzuki E, Hirata Y, Hayakawa H, Omata M, Kojima M, Kangawa K, Minamino N, Matsuo H: Evidence for C-type natriuretic peptide production in the rat kidney. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1993, 192:532-538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Walker C, Everitt J, Freed JJ, Knudson AG, Jr, Whiteley LO: Altered expression of transforming growth factor-α in hereditary rat renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 1991, 51:2973-2978 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yu M, Sato H, Seiki M, Spiegel S, Thompson EW: Calcium influx inhibits MT1-MMP processing and blocks MMP-2 activation. FEBS Lett 1997, 412:568-572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lehti K, Lohi J, Valtanen H, Keski-Oja J: Proteolytic processing of membrane-type-1 matrix metalloproteinase is associated with gelatinase A activation at the cell surface. Biochem J 1998, 334:345-353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Giannelli G, Fransvea E, Marinosci F, Bergamini C, Colucci S, Schiraldi O, Antonaci S: Transforming growth factor-β1 triggers hepatocellular carcinoma invasiveness via α3β1 integrin. Am J Pathol 2002, 161:183-193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Powell DW, Mifflin RC, Valentich JD, Crowe SE, Saada JI, West AB: Myofibroblasts: I. paracrine cells important in health and disease. Am J Physiol 1999, 277:C1-C9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gilles C, Polette M, Coraux C, Tournier JM, Meneguzzi G, Munaut C, Volders L, Rousselle P, Birembaut P, Foidart JM: Contribution of MT1-MMP and of human laminin-5 γ2 chain degradation to mammary epithelial cell migration. J Cell Sci 2001, 114:2967-2976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hendrix MJ, Seftor EA, Chu YW, Trevor KT, Seftor RE: Role of intermediate filaments in migration, invasion, and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev 1996, 15:507-525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hendrix MJ, Seftor EA, Seftor RE, Trevor KT: Experimental co-expression of vimentin and keratin intermediate filaments in human breast cancer cells results in phenotypic interconversion and increased invasive behavior. Am J Pathol 1997, 150:483-495 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Birchmeier C, Birchmeier W, Brand-Saberi B: Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in cancer progression. Acta Anat (Basel) 1996, 156:217-226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Boyer B, Valles AM, Edme N: Induction and regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. Biochem Pharmacol 2000, 60:1091-1099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Desmouliere A, Geinoz A, Gabbiani F, Gabbiani G: Transforming growth factor-β 1 induces α-smooth muscle actin expression in granulation tissue myofibroblasts and in quiescent and growing cultured fibroblasts. J Cell Biol 1993, 122:103-111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Grupp C, Lottermoser J, Cohen DI, Begher M, Franz HE, Muller GA: Transformation of rat inner medullary fibroblasts to myofibroblasts in vitro. Kidney Int 1997, 52:1279-1290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gressner AM: Transdifferentiation of hepatic stellate cells (Ito cells) to myofibroblasts: a key event in hepatic fibrogenesis. Kidney Int Suppl 1996, 54:S39-S45 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Shi Y, O’Brien JE, Jr, Fard A, Zalewski A: Transforming growth factor-β 1 expression and myofibroblast formation during arterial repair. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1996, 16:1298-1305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zavadil J, Bitzer M, Liang D, Yang YC, Massimi A, Kneitz S, Piek E, Bottinger EP: Genetic programs of epithelial cell plasticity directed by transforming growth factor-β. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:6686-6691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Fukai F, Ohtaki M, Fujii N, Yajima H, Ishii T, Nishizawa Y, Miyazaki K, Katayama T: Release of biological activities from quiescent fibronectin by a conformational change and limited proteolysis by matrix metalloproteinases. Biochemistry 1995, 34:11453-11459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Giannelli G, Falk-Marzillier J, Schiraldi O, Stetler-Stevenson WG, Quaranta V: Induction of cell migration by matrix metalloprotease-2 cleavage of laminin-5. Science 1997, 277:225-228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sato H, Takino T, Kinoshita T, Imai K, Okada Y, Stetler Stevenson WG, Seiki M: Cell surface binding and activation of gelatinase A induced by expression of membrane-type-1-matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP). FEBS Lett 1996, 385:238-240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Imai K, Ohuchi E, Aoki T, Nomura H, Fujii Y, Sato H, Seiki M, Okada Y: Membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase 1 is a gelatinolytic enzyme and is secreted in a complex with tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2. Cancer Res 1996, 56:2707-2710 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Pei D, Weiss SJ: Transmembrane-deletion mutants of the membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase-1 process progelatinase A and express intrinsic matrix-degrading activity. J Biol Chem 1996, 271:9135-9140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Sato H, Seiki M: Membrane-type matrix metalloproteinases (MT-MMPs) in tumor metastasis. J Biochem (Tokyo) 1996, 119:209-215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ohuchi E, Imai K, Fujii Y, Sato H, Seiki M, Okada Y: Membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase digests interstitial collagens and other extracellular matrix macromolecules. J Biol Chem 1997, 272:2446-2451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Koshikawa N, Giannelli G, Cirulli V, Miyazaki K, Quaranta V: Role of cell surface metalloprotease MT1-MMP in epithelial cell migration over laminin-5. J Cell Biol 2000, 148:615-624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.d’Ortho MP, Will H, Atkinson S, Butler G, Messent A, Gavrilovic J, Smith B, Timpl R, Zardi L, Murphy G: Membrane-type matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 2 exhibit broad-spectrum proteolytic capacities comparable to many matrix metalloproteinases. Eur J Biochem 1997, 250:751-757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kridel SJ, Chen E, Smith JW: A substrate phage enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to profile panels of proteases. Anal Biochem 2001, 294:176-184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kridel SJ, Chen E, Kotra LP, Howard EW, Mobashery S, Smith JW: Substrate hydrolysis by matrix metalloproteinase-9. J Biol Chem 2001, 276:20572-20578 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Chen EI, Kridel SJ, Howard EW, Li W, Godzik A, Smith JW: A unique substrate recognition profile for matrix metalloproteinase-2. J Biol Chem 2002, 277:4485-4491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Xu J, Rodriguez D, Petitclerc E, Kim JJ, Hangai M, Moon YS, Davis GE, Brooks PC, Yuen SM: Proteolytic exposure of a cryptic site within collagen type IV is required for angiogenesis and tumor growth in vivo. J Cell Biol 2001, 154:1069-1079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lochter A, Galosy S, Muschler J, Freedman N, Werb Z, Bissell MJ: Matrix metalloproteinase stromelysin-1 triggers a cascade of molecular alterations that leads to stable epithelial-to-mesenchymal conversion and a premalignant phenotype in mammary epithelial cells. J Cell Biol 1997, 139:1861-1872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ho AT, Voura EB, Soloway PD, Watson KL, Khokha R: MMP inhibitors augment fibroblast adhesion through stabilization of focal adhesion contacts and up-regulation of cadherin function. J Biol Chem 2001, 276:40215-40224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Qin H, Sun Y, Benveniste EN: The transcription factors Sp1, Sp3, and AP-2 are required for constitutive matrix metalloproteinase-2 gene expression in astroglioma cells. J Biol Chem 1999, 274:29130-29137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Haas TL, Stitelman D, Davis SJ, Apte SS, Madri JA: Egr-1 mediates extracellular matrix-driven transcription of membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase in endothelium. J Biol Chem 1999, 274:22679-22685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Botella LM, Sanchez-Elsner T, Rius C, Corbi A, Bernabeu C: Identification of a critical Sp1 site within the endoglin promoter and its involvement in the transforming growth factor-β stimulation. J Biol Chem 2001, 276:34486-34494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Poncelet AC, Schnaper HW: Sp1 and Smad proteins cooperate to mediate transforming growth factor-β 1-induced α 2(I) collagen expression in human glomerular mesangial cells. J Biol Chem 2001, 276:6983-6992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Feng XH, Lin X, Derynck R: Smad2, Smad3, and Smad4 cooperate with Sp1 to induce p15(Ink4B) transcription in response to TGF-β. EMBO J 2000, 19:5178-5193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Ara T, Deyama Y, Yoshimura Y, Higashino F, Shindoh M, Matsumoto A, Fukuda H: Membrane-type 1-matrix metalloproteinase expression is regulated by E-cadherin through the suppression of mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Cancer Lett 2000, 157:115-121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Morgunova E, Tuuttila A, Bergmann U, Isupov M, Lindqvist Y, Schneider G, Tryggvason K: Structure of human pro-matrix metalloproteinase-2: activation mechanism revealed. Science 1999, 284:1667-1670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]