Abstract
The in situ production of methane was monitored in several types of tropical benthic communities. A bed of Thalassia testudinum located in Caesar Creek (Florida Keys) exhibited the highest methanogenic activity (initial rates = 1.81 to 1.86 μmol CH4/m2 per h) as compared with another seagrass (Syringodium sp., 0.15 to 0.33 μmol/m2 per h) and two coral reef environments (Hydro-Lab, 0.016 to 0.10 μmol/m2 per h; Curaçao, 0.14 to 0.47 μmol/m2 per h). The results suggest that a wide variety of benthic metabolic processes (e.g., photosynthetic oxygen production) influences methane production rates.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bauchop T. Inhibition of rumen methanogenesis by methane analogues. J Bacteriol. 1967 Jul;94(1):171–175. doi: 10.1128/jb.94.1.171-175.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brock T. D. Microbial growth rates in nature. Bacteriol Rev. 1971 Mar;35(1):39–58. doi: 10.1128/br.35.1.39-58.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cappenberg T. E. Interrelations between sulfate-reducing and methane-producing bacteria in bottom deposits of a fresh-water lake. I. Field observations. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1974;40(2):285–295. doi: 10.1007/BF00394387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jensen S., Jernelöv A. Biological methylation of mercury in aquatic organisms. Nature. 1969 Aug 16;223(5207):753–754. doi: 10.1038/223753a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martens C. S., Berner R. A. Methane production in the interstitial waters of sulfate-depleted marine sediments. Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1167–1169. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolfe R. S. Microbial formation of methane. Adv Microb Physiol. 1971;6:107–146. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60068-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wood J. M., Kennedy F. S., Rosen C. G. Synthesis of methyl-mercury compounds by extracts of a methanogenic bacterium. Nature. 1968 Oct 12;220(5163):173–174. doi: 10.1038/220173a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]