Skip to main content
PMC home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1992 Oct 10;305(6858):875–877. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6858.875

An alternative to QALYs: the saved young life equivalent (SAVE)

E Nord 1
PMCID: PMC1883082  PMID: 1301030

Full text

PDF
876

Images in this article

876p876-a
on p.876

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carr-Hill R. A. Assumptions of the QALY procedure. Soc Sci Med. 1989;29(3):469–477. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90296-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hadorn D. C. Setting health care priorities in Oregon. Cost-effectiveness meets the rule of rescue. JAMA. 1991 May 1;265(17):2218–2225. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hayward R. A., Shapiro M. F., Oye R. K. Laboratory testing on cerebrospinal fluid. A reappraisal. Lancet. 1987 Jan 3;1(8523):1–4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)90698-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kaplan R. M., Anderson J. P. A general health policy model: update and applications. Health Serv Res. 1988 Jun;23(2):203–235. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kaplan R. M., Bush J. W., Berry C. C. Health status index: category rating versus magnitude estimation for measuring levels of well-being. Med Care. 1979 May;17(5):501–525. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Loomes G., McKenzie L. The use of QALYs in health care decision making. Soc Sci Med. 1989;28(4):299–308. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90030-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mulley A. G., Jr Assessing patients' utilities. Can the ends justify the means? Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3 Suppl):S269–S281. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nord E. EuroQol: health-related quality of life measurement. Valuations of health states by the general public in Norway. Health Policy. 1991 Jun;18(1):25–36. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(91)90141-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nord E. Methods for quality adjustment of life years. Soc Sci Med. 1992 Mar;34(5):559–569. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90211-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nord E. The significance of contextual factors in valuing health states. Health Policy. 1989;13(3):189–198. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(89)90092-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nord E. The validity of a visual analogue scale in determining social utility weights for health states. Int J Health Plann Manage. 1991 Jul-Sep;6(3):234–242. doi: 10.1002/hpm.4740060308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rosser R. M., Watts V. C. The measurement of hospital output. Int J Epidemiol. 1972 Winter;1(4):361–368. doi: 10.1093/ije/1.4.361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sintonen H. An approach to measuring and valuing health states. Soc Sci Med Med Econ. 1981 Jun;15(2):55–65. doi: 10.1016/0160-7995(81)90019-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Torrance G. W., Boyle M. H., Horwood S. P. Application of multi-attribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states. Oper Res. 1982 Nov-Dec;30(6):1043–1069. doi: 10.1287/opre.30.6.1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Torrance G. W. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ. 1986 Mar;5(1):1–30. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(86)90020-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wagstaff A. QALYs and the equity-efficiency trade-off. J Health Econ. 1991 May;10(1):21–41. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(91)90015-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Weinstein M. C., Stason W. B. Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices. N Engl J Med. 1977 Mar 31;296(13):716–721. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197703312961304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Williams A. Who is to live? A question for the economist or the doctor? World Hosp. 1987 Oct;23(3-4):34–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES