Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1992 Jun;36(6):1310–1315. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.6.1310

In vitro activity of OPC-17116.

H C Neu 1, W Fang 1, J W Gu 1, N X Chin 1
PMCID: PMC190337  PMID: 1329620

Abstract

The in vitro activity of OPC-17116, a new C-5 methyl fluoroquinolone, was compared with the activities of other fluoroquinolones. OPC-17116 inhibited 50% of the members of the family Enterobacteriaceae tested and 90% of Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria species, and Moraxella catarrhalis isolates at less than or equal to 0.25 microgram/ml. At less than or equal to 2 micrograms/ml, 90% of the Enterobacteriaceae were inhibited, which was comparable to or better than the activities of fleroxacin, ofloxacin, and lomefloxacin but less than the activity of ciprofloxacin. OPC-17116 inhibited 90% of the staphylococci tested at less than or equal to 0.25 micrograms/ml, but it did not inhibit methicillin-resistant, ciprofloxacin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Staphylococcus epidermidis. Group A, B, C, F, and G streptococci and Streptococcus pneumoniae were inhibited by less than or equal to 0.5 microgram/ml, being four-fold more active than ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin. Tosufloxacin was the most active agent tested against gram-positive cocci. OPC-17116 inhibited Bacteroides fragilis at 4 micrograms/ml. There was a minimal effect of inoculum size on MIC, and the MBCs were within 1 dilution of the MICs. The activity of OPC-17116 was decreased at pH 6 and in the presence of high Mg2+ concentrations, but it was unaffected by human serum. OPC-17116 showed a postantibiotic effect against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus similar to the postantibiotic effects reported for other fluoroquinolones. The frequency of spontaneous single-step resistance was low (less than 10(-9)), but repeated passage of organisms in the presence of OPC-17116 resulted in the selection of resistant isolates.

Full text

PDF
1314

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blumberg H. M., Rimland D., Carroll D. J., Terry P., Wachsmuth I. K. Rapid development of ciprofloxacin resistance in methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis. 1991 Jun;163(6):1279–1285. doi: 10.1093/infdis/163.6.1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chin N. X., Gu J. W., Yu K. W., Zhang Y. X., Neu H. C. In vitro activity of sparfloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Mar;35(3):567–571. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.3.567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chin N. X., Neu H. C. Post-antibiotic suppressive effect of ciprofloxacin against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Am J Med. 1987 Apr 27;82(4A):58–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hirschhorn L., Neu H. C. Factors influencing the in vitro activity of two new aryl-fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents, difloxacin (A-56619) and A-56620. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Jul;30(1):143–146. doi: 10.1128/aac.30.1.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hooper D. C., Wolfson J. S. Fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents. N Engl J Med. 1991 Feb 7;324(6):384–394. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199102073240606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jorgensen J. H., Redding J. S., Maher L. A., Howell A. W. Improved medium for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae. J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Nov;25(11):2105–2113. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.11.2105-2113.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pearson R. D., Steigbigel R. T., Davis H. T., Chapman S. W. Method of reliable determination of minimal lethal antibiotic concentrations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Nov;18(5):699–708. doi: 10.1128/aac.18.5.699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES