Skip to main content
British Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology
. 1985 May;85(1):277–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1985.tb08857.x

Similarity between mu-opioid receptors in mouse vas deferens and guinea-pig ileum.

J Goodall, I E Hughes, D Mackay
PMCID: PMC1916768  PMID: 2992651

Abstract

The effects of the opioid receptor agonist RX783006 and of the opioid receptor partial agonist (+)-meptazinol have been examined on electrically-induced twitch responses of the guinea-pig isolated ileum and of the mouse isolated vas deferens. Log10 concentration-tissue state curves were determined for (+)-meptazinol and for RX783006, alone, in combination and, when appropriate, in the presence of naloxone (30 nM). Analysis of these log10 concentration-tissue state curves using the null equations derived and verified in the previous paper allows quantitation of the characteristics of the interaction of (+)-meptazinol with the opioid receptors in these tissues. The results indicate that the apparent differences in the actions of (+)-meptazinol on isolated electrically-stimulated guinea-pig ileum and mouse vas deferens can be accounted for without the need to postulate differences between mu-opioid receptors in these two tissues.

Full text

PDF
278

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bill D. J., Hartley J. E., Stephens R. J., Thompson A. M. The antinociceptive activity of meptazinol depends on both opiate and cholinergic mechanisms. Br J Pharmacol. 1983 May;79(1):191–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1983.tb10512.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Duchesne R. J., Goodall J., Hughes I. E. Pharmacological effects of meptazinol and its enantiomers on guinea-pig ileum and mouse vas deferens. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1984 Aug;36(8):560–562. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1984.tb04455.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hughes I. E., Mackay D. Quantification of the characteristics of antagonists exhibiting both competitive antagonism and functional interaction. Br J Pharmacol. 1985 May;85(1):271–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1985.tb08856.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kenakin T. P., Black J. W. The pharmacological classification of practolol and chloropractolol. Mol Pharmacol. 1978 Jul;14(4):607–623. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mackay D. A general analysis of the receptor-drug interaction. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1966 Jan;26(1):9–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1966.tb01805.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pasternak G. W. High and low affinity opioid binding sites: relationship to mu and delta sites. Life Sci. 1982 Sep 20;31(12-13):1303–1306. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(82)90367-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sayre L. M., Portoghese P. S., Takemori A. E. Difference between mu-receptors in the guinea pig ileum and the mouse vas deferens. Eur J Pharmacol. 1983 May 20;90(1):159–160. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(83)90232-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schulz R., Wüster M. Are there subtypes (isoreceptors) of multiple opiate receptors in the mouse vas deferens? Eur J Pharmacol. 1981 Nov 19;76(1):61–66. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(81)90009-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stephens R. J., Waterfall J. F., Franklin R. A. A review of the biological properties and metabolic disposition of the new analgesic agent, meptazinol. Gen Pharmacol. 1978;9(2):73–78. doi: 10.1016/0306-3623(78)90002-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Takemori A. E., Portoghese P. S. Comparative antagonism by naltrexone and naloxone of mu, kappa, and delta agonists. Eur J Pharmacol. 1984 Sep 3;104(1-2):101–104. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(84)90374-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wood P. L., Richard J. W., Thakur M. Mu opiate isoreceptors: differentiation with kappa agonists. Life Sci. 1982 Nov 15;31(20-21):2313–2317. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(82)90145-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES