Abstract
Recent advances in DNA identification technology are making their way into the criminal law. States across the country are enacting legislation to create repositories for the storage both of DNA samples collected from convicted offenders and of the DNA profiles derived from them. These data banks will be used to assist in the resolution of future crimes. This study surveys existing state statues, pending legislation, and administrative regulations that govern these DNA forensic data banks. We critically analyzed these laws with respect to their treatment of the collection, storage, analysis, retrieval, and use of DNA and DNA data. We found much variation among data-banking laws and conclude that, while DNA forensic data banking carries tremendous potential for law enforcement, many states, in their rush to create data banks, have paid little attention to issues of quality control, quality assurance, and privacy. In addition, the sweep of some laws is unnecessarily broad. Legislative modifications are needed in many states to better safeguard civil liberties and individual privacy.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Anderson C. Courts reject DNA fingerprinting, citing controversy after NAS report. Nature. 1992 Oct 1;359(6394):349–349. doi: 10.1038/359349a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Annas G. J. Privacy rules for DNA databanks. Protecting coded 'future diaries'. JAMA. 1993 Nov 17;270(19):2346–2350. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richards R. I., Sutherland G. R. Dynamic mutations: a new class of mutations causing human disease. Cell. 1992 Sep 4;70(5):709–712. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90302-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roberts L. Fight erupts over DNA fingerprinting. Science. 1991 Dec 20;254(5039):1721–1723. doi: 10.1126/science.1763321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]