Abstract
Biosynthesis of nitrogenase P-cluster has attracted considerable attention because it is biologically important and chemically unprecedented. Previous studies suggest that P-cluster is formed from a precursor consisting of paired [4Fe–4S]-like clusters and that P-cluster is assembled stepwise on MoFe protein, i.e., one cluster is assembled before the other. Here, we specifically tackle the assembly of the second P-cluster by combined biochemical and spectroscopic approaches. By using a P-cluster maturation assay that is based on purified components, we show that the maturation of the second P-cluster requires the concerted action of NifZ, Fe protein, and MgATP and that the action of NifZ is required before that of Fe protein/MgATP, suggesting that NifZ may act as a chaperone that facilitates the subsequent action of Fe protein/MgATP. Furthermore, we provide spectroscopic evidence that the [4Fe–4S] cluster-like fragments can be converted to P-clusters, thereby firmly establishing the physiological relevance of the previously identified P-cluster precursor.
Keywords: assembly, NifZ
Nitrogenase provides the essential machinery for the biological reduction of dinitrogen to ammonia (for recent reviews, see refs. 1–5). The Mo-nitrogenase of Azotobacter vinelandii is a two-component system composed of the Fe protein and the MoFe protein. The homodimeric Fe protein has one ATP binding site per subunit and a single [4Fe–4S] cluster bridged in between the subunits, whereas the α2β2-tetrameric MoFe protein (Fig. 1A) contains two unique clusters per αβ-subunit pair: the [8Fe–7S] P-cluster (6), which is located at the αβ-subunit interface, and the [Mo–7Fe–9S–X–homocitrate]† iron–molybdenum cofactor (FeMoco) (7), which is positioned within the α-subunit. Nitrogenase catalysis involves a series of complex formation and dissociation between the Fe protein and the MoFe protein, during which process the electrons are sequentially transferred from the [4Fe–4S] cluster of the Fe protein, through the P-cluster, to the FeMoco within the MoFe protein, where substrate reduction eventually occurs. The complexity of nitrogenase reaction mechanism is undoubtedly associated with the presence of complex metalloclusters in the enzyme, namely, the P-cluster and FeMoco, the structure and function of which have served as one of the central topics in nitrogenase research for decades.
The P-cluster holds a unique place in nitrogenase chemistry. Catalytically, it serves as a “hub” that mediates the shuffling of electrons between the metal centers of the Fe protein and the MoFe protein. Structurally, it represents a high-nuclearity, Fe/S-only cluster that can be viewed as two [4Fe–4S] subclusters sharing a μ6-sulfide. Such a “modular” composition suggests that the P-cluster is formed through the fusion of its substructural units, a reaction mechanism that is well established in synthetic inorganic chemistry (8) and further supported by recent advances toward successful synthesis of P-cluster topologs (9–12). Biological evidence of such a fusion mechanism came from studies of three FeMoco-deficient forms of A. vinelandii MoFe protein (Fig. 1B) that allowed analysis of P-cluster species without the interference of FeMoco. One of these MoFe proteins, designated Av1ΔnifH (Fig. 1B, I), was obtained by deleting nifH, the gene encoding the subunit of Fe protein (13–16), whereas another of them, designated Av1ΔnifB (Fig. 1B, III), was obtained by deleting nifB, the gene specifically involved in FeMoco biosynthesis (17). Compared with Av1ΔnifB, which has two intact P-clusters (17), Av1ΔnifH contains two pairs of [4Fe–4S]-like clusters in their places (14). Additionally, in contrast to Av1ΔnifB, which can be activated directly by isolated FeMoco (17), Av1ΔnifH can be fully activated only after incubation with Fe protein and MgATP in crude extract (18). Thus, Av1ΔnifB could represent the end product of P-cluster biosynthesis, whereas Av1ΔnifH may represent a physiologically relevant intermediate that occurred at an earlier stage of this process. Apart from Av1ΔnifB and Av1ΔnifH, a third form of FeMoco-deficient MoFe protein, designated Av1ΔnifZΔnifB (Fig. 1B, II), was obtained by deleting nifZ,‡ the gene encoding a small protein with unknown function, along with nifB (19). Compared with the “all precursor” Av1ΔnifH and the “all P-cluster” Av1ΔnifB, Av1ΔnifZΔnifB is a “half-assembled” form of MoFe protein, containing, in one αβ-subunit pair, a P-cluster, and in the other, a pair of [4Fe–4S]-like clusters (19). The [4Fe–4S]-like fragments in Av1ΔnifZΔnifB are similar to those in Av1ΔnifH (13–16, 19) (M. Cotton, K. Rupnik, R. Broach, Y.H., A.W.F., M.W.R., and B. J. Hales, unpublished work), indicating that Av1ΔnifZΔnifB may represent another physiologically relevant intermediate, midway in between the earlier intermediate represented by Av1ΔnifH and the end product represented by Av1ΔnifB, during P-cluster assembly. Combined results from these studies suggest that (i) the final assembly of P-cluster occurs at its targeted location on the MoFe protein; (ii) the P-cluster is likely formed, in vivo, through fusion of small [4Fe–4S] cluster-like modules; (iii) the two P-clusters in the two αβ-subunit halves of the protein are assembled in a stepwise fashion; and (iv) Fe protein (nifH gene product) is required for P-cluster assembly in a process that involves MgATP hydrolysis; and (v) NifZ (nifZ gene product) is specifically involved in the formation of the “second” P-cluster.
Although a pair of [4Fe–4S]-like clusters has been associated with a P-cluster precursor under in vivo conditions, there is no direct proof that this precursor can indeed be converted to a mature P-cluster. In addition, the combinations of factors required for different stages of P-cluster assembly have not been determined. In this study, we specifically tackle the assembly process of the second P-cluster by combining biochemical and spectroscopic approaches. By using a P-cluster maturation assay that is based on purified components, we show that the maturation of the second P-cluster requires the concerted action of NifZ, Fe protein, and MgATP and that the action of NifZ is required before that of Fe protein/MgATP, suggesting that NifZ may act as a chaperone that facilitates the subsequent action of Fe protein/MgATP. Furthermore, we provide spectroscopic evidence that the [4Fe–4S] cluster-like fragments can be converted to P-clusters, thereby firmly establishing the physiological relevance of the previously identified P-cluster precursor.
Results
The various MoFe and Fe proteins in this work are designated Av1 and Av2, respectively, with appropriate superscripts defining the genetic background and/or biochemical handling of the proteins (e.g., the wild-type MoFe and Fe proteins are designated Av1wt and Av2wt, respectively). For detailed designations, see Table 1.
Table 1.
Designation of protein | Genetic or biochemical handling | Source |
---|---|---|
Av2wt | Wild-type Fe protein | A. vinelandii strain AvYM13A |
Av2E146D | E146D Fe protein point mutation | A. vinelandii strain AvYM48A |
Av2M156C | M156C Fe protein point mutation | A. vinelandii strain AvYM49A |
Av1wt | Wild-type MoFe protein | — |
Av1ΔnifB | Histidine-tagged MoFe protein, deletion of nifB gene | A. vinelandii strain AvDJ1143 |
Av1ΔnifΖΔnifB | Histidine-tagged MoFe protein, deletion of nifZ and nifB genes | A. vinelandii strain AvYM6A |
Av1ΔnifΖΔnifB(varied time)* | A. vinelandii strain AvYM6A | |
Av1ΔnifΖΔnifB(0) | Av1ΔnifΖΔnifB was incubated 60 min without NifZ/Av2wt/MgATP and subsequently repurified | — |
Av1ΔnifΖΔnifB(15′, 30′, 45′, or 60′) | Av1ΔnifΖΔnifB was incubated 15, 30, 45, or 60 min with NifZ/Av2wt/MgATP and subsequently repurified | — |
Av1ΔnifΖΔnifB(+Av2/ATP)* | Av1ΔnifΖΔnifB was incubated 60 min with Av2wt/MgATP and subsequently repurified | A. vinelandii strain AvYM6A |
Av1ΔnifΖΔnifB(+NifZ)* | Av1ΔnifΖΔnifB was incubated 60 min with NifZ and subsequently repurified | A. vinelandii strain AvYM6A |
NifZ | Streptavidin-tagged NifZ | E. coli strain EcYM1A |
The component proteins of the Mo-nitrogenase are designated by the initials of the organism from which they are isolated and the Arabic numeral of the component. For example, MoFe protein and Fe protein of the Mo-nitrogenase of A. vinelandii are designated Av1 and Av2, respectively.
*Proteins were prepared as described in Materials and Methods.
Preparation of Components for P-Cluster Maturation.
To establish the requirement for the maturation of the second P-cluster, the half-assembled Av1ΔnifZΔnifB and the factors known to be involved in P-cluster assembly, such as NifZ and Av2wt, were prepared as follows. Av1ΔnifZΔnifB and Av2wt were homologously expressed in A. vinelandii and purified at yields of 200 and 400 mg per 200-g cell, respectively, whereas NifZ was heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli and isolated at a yield of 30 mg per 100-g cell. Purified NifZ is colorless. The polypeptide of NifZ is ≈19 kDa,§ as shown by denaturing gel electrophoresis (Fig. 2A) and mass spectrometry (data not shown). Under native conditions, NifZ has an apparent molecular mass of ≈20 kDa (Fig. 2B), indicating that it is a monomeric protein.
Assessment of Requirement for P-Cluster Maturation.
An in vitro P-cluster maturation assay was subsequently performed, in which Av1ΔnifZΔnifB was (i) incubated with combinations of NifZ, Av2wt, and MgATP; (ii) activated by isolated FeMoco; and (iii) assayed for enzymatic activity. In the absence of maturation factors, Av1ΔnifZΔnifB (Table 2, line 2) can be activated to an average of 51% compared with Av1ΔnifB (Table 2, line 1). This observation is consistent with the existing content of mature P-cluster, 50% and 100%, respectively, in Av1ΔnifZΔnifB and Av1ΔnifB (Fig. 1B, II and III) (17, 19). Maturation of the second P-cluster in Av1ΔnifZΔnifB, therefore, can be monitored by an increased activation that theoretically falls between the minimal 50% (one P-cluster per protein) and the maximal 100% (two P-clusters per protein).
Table 2.
Line | Assay components |
Activities |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Av1 | NifZ | Av2wt | ATP | FeMoco | C2H4 formation under C2H2/Ar | H2 formation under Ar | NH3 formation under N2 | H2 formation under N2 | Average, % | |
1 | Av1ΔnifB* | − | − | − | + | 1,014 ± 29 (100) | 998 ± 31 (100) | 633 ± 6 (100) | 223 ± 34 (100) | 100 |
2 | Av1ΔnifZΔnifB† | − | − | − | + | 504 ± 4 (50) | 545 ± 51 (55) | 311 ± 7 (49) | 108 ± 4 (48) | 51 |
3 | Av1ΔnifZΔnifB | + | + | + | + | 864 ± 33 (85) | 888 ± 39 (89) | 582 ± 22 (92) | 173 ± 7 (78) | 86 |
4 | Av1ΔnifZΔnifB | − | + | + | + | 525 ± 6 (52) | 576 ± 12 (58) | 276 ± 50 (44) | 118 ± 2 (53) | 52 |
5 | Av1ΔnifZΔnifB | + | − | + | + | 520 ± 8 (51) | 550 ± 21 (55) | 325 ± 51 (51) | 105 ± 1 (47) | 51 |
6 | Av1ΔnifZΔnifB | + | + | − | + | 520 ± 42 (51) | 567 ± 16 (57) | 317 ± 52 (50) | 113 ± 7 (51) | 52 |
7 | Av1ΔnifZΔnifB | − | − | + | + | 485 ± 7 (48) | 545 ± 15 (55) | 288 ± 54 (45) | 110 ± 1 (49) | 49 |
8 | Av1ΔnifZΔnifB | − | + | − | + | 490 ± 17 (48) | 559 ± 12 (56) | 323 ± 50 (51) | 111 ± 1 (50) | 51 |
9 | Av1ΔnifZΔnifB | + | − | − | + | 493 ± 15 (49) | 537 ± 19 (54) | 302 ± 58 (48) | 111 ± 2 (50) | 50 |
Activities of C2H4 formation under C2H2/Ar, H2 formation under Ar, NH3 formation under N2, and H2 formation under N2 are expressed as nanomoles per minute per milligram of protein. Percentages relative to Av1ΔnifB (line 1) are given in parentheses. The assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. The lower detection limits for the activities were 0.01, 0.02, 0.001, and 0.02 nmol·min−1·mg protein−1 for C2H4 formation under C2H2/Ar, H2 formation under Ar, NH3 formation under N2, and H2 formation under N2, respectively.
*Av1ΔnifB contains 100% fully assembled P-cluster and can be fully activated upon insertion of isolated FeMoco (17).
†Av1ΔnifZnifB contains 50% fully assembled P-cluster and can be activated to 50% of that of Av1ΔnifB in the absence of P-cluster maturation factors (19).
As shown in Table 2, upon incubation with NifZ, Av2wt, and MgATP, Av1ΔnifZΔnifB can be further activated to an average of 86% of the maximal level (Table 2, line 3), indicating a corresponding increase of the amount of mature P-cluster by 36%. Such an elevated level of Av1ΔnifZΔnifB reconstitution cannot be observed when one or two of these components are omitted (Table 2, lines 4–9). Thus, increased activation of Av1ΔnifZΔnifB involves the combined action of NifZ, Av2wt, and MgATP. In the presence of excess MgATP, activation of Av1ΔnifZΔnifB reaches the empirical maxima at ≈2 μM NifZ (Fig. 3A) and ≈2.5 μM Av2wt (Fig. 3B). Given that Av2wt is the only known nucleotide-binding protein in the assay, it is mostly likely that Av2wt-mediated hydrolysis of MgATP is required for this process. Indeed, when ATP is replaced by ADP or nonhydrolyzable analogues of ATP, such as 5′-adenylylimidodiphosphate or adenosine 5′-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) [supporting information (SI) Table 3, lines 3–5], Av1ΔnifZΔnifB cannot be activated beyond 50%. Furthermore, when Av2wt is replaced by Av2M156C, an Av2 variant specifically defective in MgATP hydrolysis (20), no increased activation of Av1ΔnifZΔnifB is observed (SI Table 3, line 8), whereas, when Av2wt is replaced by Av2E146D, an Av2 variant that supports normal MgATP hydrolysis despite being defective elsewhere (21), Av1ΔnifZΔnifB can still be activated to an average of 80% of the maximal level (SI Table 3, line 9).
Analysis of Cluster Conversion During P-Cluster Maturation.
To obtain further evidence that the increased level of Av1ΔnifZΔnifB reconstitution is associated with the conversion of P-cluster precursor to mature P-cluster, a series of repurified Av1ΔnifZΔnifB proteins was obtained after incubation with NifZ, Av2wt, and MgATP for increasing time intervals (categorically designated Av1ΔnifZΔnifB/(varied time); for detailed designations, see Table 1). Upon addition of isolated FeMoco, Av1ΔnifZΔnifB(varied time) proteins exhibit an increase in activation level that correlates with the increase in incubation time before repurification, reaching the maxima of 86% activation at 60 min (SI Table 4; also see Fig. 4A). When subjected to perpendicular-mode EPR analysis (Fig. 4B), dithionite-reduced Av1ΔnifZΔnifB(varied time) proteins show a decrease in the magnitude of the S = ½ signal that has been previously assigned to the P-cluster precursor in the “second half” of the Av1ΔnifZΔnifB protein (19), whereas, when subjected to parallel-mode EPR analysis (Fig. 4C), indigo disulfonate-oxidized Av1ΔnifZΔnifB(varied time) proteins display an increase in the intensity of the unique signal that is specific for the P-cluster in the P2+ oxidation state (22, 23), indicating an increase of mature P-cluster content as a result of the conversion of P-cluster precursor into fully assembled cluster. Over a time period of 60 min, the percentages of changes in perpendicular and parallel-mode EPR signals¶ are 32% and 41%, respectively, which correlate well with the 37% increase in activity (Fig. 4 and SI Table 4). Av1ΔnifZΔnifB(varied time) proteins also show an increase in the absorption intensity between 475 and 575 nm (Fig. 4D), a feature associated with an increase in the mature P-cluster content (15). It is interesting to note that, whereas the scale of precursor-associated S = ½ signal cannot be reduced further with longer incubation (Fig. 4B), the magnitude of the P2+-specific signal increases progressively with incubation time (Fig. 4C), which is consistent with the gradual increase in activity (Fig. 4A). These results suggest that the maturation of the P-cluster is likely a biphasic process, during which the initial modification of precursor occurs at a fast rate (within 15 min, Fig. 4B), whereas the eventual formation of P-cluster takes place at a slower pace (over 60 min) (Fig. 4C).
Determination of Sequence of Events of P-Cluster Maturation.
To establish whether the actions of NifZ, Av2wt, and MgATP occur in a sequential manner, repurified Av1ΔnifZΔnifB protein was produced after incubation with either NifZ alone [designated Av1ΔnifZΔnifB(+NifZ)] or Av2wt and MgATP [designated Av1ΔnifZΔnifB(+Av2/ATP)] (for detailed designations, see Table 1). Neither Av1ΔnifZΔnifB(+NifZ) nor Av1ΔnifZΔnifB(+Av2/ATP) shows noticeable changes from Av1ΔnifZΔnifB in terms of spectroscopic properties (Fig. 5). Consistent with this observation, upon addition of isolated FeMoco, neither protein can be activated beyond 50% (SI Table 5, lines 2 and 5). Nevertheless, when combined with Av2wt and MgATP, Av1ΔnifZΔnifB(+NifZ) protein can be activated to 85% (SI Table 5, line 7), whereas, combined with NifZ, Av1ΔnifZΔnifB(+Av2/ATP) cannot be activated above the baseline level of 50% (SI Table 5, line 3). These data strongly suggest that the maturation of P-cluster requires the action of NifZ before that of Av2wt/MgATP and that the well-coordinated events carried out sequentially by NifZ and Av2wt/MgATP initiate the modification of the precursor (Fig. 4B) that eventually leads to the formation of the mature P-cluster (Fig. 4C).
Discussion
Plausible Mechanism of P-Cluster Maturation.
Our Av1ΔnifZΔnifB-based studies of P-cluster maturation allow us to unambiguously identify the key factors for the assembly of the second P-cluster and, further, to establish the sequence of events during this process. More importantly, they provide direct spectroscopic proof (Fig. 4 B–D) that the P-cluster precursor, previously identified as paired [4Fe–4S]-like clusters (13–16, 19) (M. Cotton, K. Rupnik, R. Broach, Y.H., A.W.F., M.W.R., and B. J. Hales, unpublished work), can be converted to the mature P-cluster and, therefore, is indeed a physiologically relevant intermediate during the biosynthesis of P-cluster. With the physiological relevance firmly established for such a P-cluster precursor, a plausible stepwise mechanism of P-cluster biosynthesis could be proposed. As shown in Fig. 6, assembly of P-cluster on Av1 starts with two pairs of [4Fe–4S]-like clusters, one in each αβ-dimer of Av1 (represented by Av1ΔnifH). Upon combined action of Av2 and perhaps other unidentified factors, one pair of the [4Fe–4S]-like clusters is converted to a fully assembled P-cluster (represented by Av1ΔnifZΔnifB). At this point, depending on the availability of FeMoco and the rate at which FeMoco is inserted, either the second pair of [4Fe–4S]-like clusters is converted to a P-cluster before the insertion of FeMoco (represented by Av1ΔnifB) or the FeMoco is inserted into the αβ-dimer containing the assembled P-cluster before the formation of the second P-cluster (represented by Av1ΔnifZ).‡,‖ In either case, maturation of the second P-cluster is assisted by the concerted action of NifZ and Av2/MgATP, as well as some other factors that may further improve the efficiency of this process.
Role of NifZ in P-Cluster Maturation.
Conversion of the second precursor starts with the action of NifZ, a small protein that exhibits little sequence homology to any other protein known to date.** Alone, NifZ does not alter the spectroscopic properties of the precursor (Fig. 5, green line). This observation, along with the primary sequence-based prediction that NifZ does not contain any defined metal- or metal cluster-binding motif, indicates that NifZ does not function through a redox reaction. Interestingly, the action of Av2wt/MgATP alone does not change the spectroscopic features of the precursor either (Fig. 5, pink line), and it is only after the task of NifZ is fulfilled that Av2wt/MgATP can carry out its function by modifying the redox characteristics of the precursor that eventually results in the formation of mature P-cluster (Fig. 5, blue line; also see SI Table 5, line 7). It is possible, therefore, that NifZ acts as a chaperone by repositioning the precursor modules in a more favorable orientation for the redox action of Av2wt/MgATP to take place.
Action of Av2wt in P-Cluster Maturation.
The role of Av2wt/MgATP in P-cluster biosynthesis has been implicated earlier by the observation that activation of Av1ΔnifH requires the presence of both Av2wt and MgATP (15, 18). Furthermore, the all-precursor composition of Av1ΔnifH (Fig. 1B, I) indicates that Av2wt/MgATP also participates in an earlier step of P-cluster assembly that results in the formation of the “first” P-cluster. The absolute requirement of MgATP hydrolysis suggests that, like substrate reduction, P-cluster formation involves Av2wt-mediated, MgATP hydrolysis-driven electron transfer; only in this case, the electrons are accepted by the P-cluster precursor instead of P-cluster. In support of this notion, redox changes of the precursor on the action of Av2wt/MgATP have been observed in the cases of both Av1ΔnifZΔnifB (Fig. 4) and Av1ΔnifH (15). Additionally, the significant conformational change of Av2wt upon MgATP hydrolysis could serve to bring the two [4Fe–4S] subclusters together in a process mimicking the docking of Av2wt on Av1wt during substrate reduction. However, P-cluster maturation occurs only at low concentrations of Av2wt and is inhibited by the presence of excess Av2wt, where substrate reduction is not affected (Fig. 3B). This observation could be explained by limited accessibility of Av1 for NifZ at high concentrations of Av2wt; or, alternatively, it could be explained by Av2wt using different mechanisms and/or different areas of the protein with different affinities for Av1 during P-cluster assembly and substrate reduction. Although essential for the assembly of both P-cluster and FeMoco, Av2wt apparently employs completely different parts of the protein for the two processes. This is based on the observation that Av2E146D, an Av2 variant specifically defective in FeMoco biosynthesis, is fully competent in the P-cluster maturation assay (SI Table 3, line 9).
Closing Remarks.
The fact that purified Av1ΔnifZΔnifB can be activated to 86% of the maximal level in the in vitro P-cluster maturation assay (Table 2, line 3) indicates that there may be other factors that further facilitate P-cluster assembly. These factors could be other nif gene-encoded products, such as NifW and NifM, which have been implicated in P-cluster assembly (25); or they could be other known chaperones, such as GroEL, which has been shown to participate in nitrogenase assembly (26). Our Av1ΔnifZΔnifB-based assay could serve as a useful tool to identify other factors required for the maturation of the second P-cluster. Additionally, a similar assay can be developed on the basis of the all-precursor Av1ΔnifH, which will allow the identification of factors required for the assembly of the first P-cluster and the determination of the sequence of events in P-cluster biosynthesis within the MoFe protein (Fig. 6). Furthermore, the observation that the formation of P-cluster occurs in a relatively slow process could facilitate the time-dependent analysis of the conversion of P-cluster precursor to mature P-cluster and may allow us to eventually address the fate of the all-important “sulfur no. 8,” the excess sulfur resulting from the fusion of the two [4Fe–4S] cluster modules during P-cluster formation.
Materials and Methods
Unless noted otherwise, all chemicals and reagents were obtained from Fisher (Hampton, NH), Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI), or Sigma (St. Louis, MO). For more details (13, 19, 20, 26–29), see SI Methods.
P-Cluster Maturation Assay.
This assay (0.8 ml) contained 25 mM Tris·HCl (pH 8.0), 0.6 mg of purified Av1ΔnifZΔnifB (19), 0.03 mg of NifZ, 0.12 mg of Av2wt, 20 mM Na2S2O4, 0.8 mM ATP, 1.6 mM MgCl2, 10 mM creatine phosphate, 8 units of creatine kinase, and 10 μl of isolated FeMoco. This mixture was then incubated at 30°C for 60 min and determined for enzymatic activities (26–29). Note that addition of excess Av2wt at this point completely inhibited P-cluster maturation on Av1ΔnifZΔnifB (Fig. 3B) but had no effect on the subsequent activity assay.
P-Cluster Maturation Assay on Av1ΔnifZΔnifB.
This assay (25 ml) contained 25 mM Tris·HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mg of Av1ΔnifZΔnifB, 5 mg of NifZ, 20 mg of Av2wt, 2.4 mM ATP, 4.8 mM MgCl2, 30 mM creatine phosphate, and 24 units/ml creatine kinase. The mixture was stirred at 30°C for 15, 30, 45, and 60 min, respectively, before Av1ΔnifZΔnifB was repurified [designated Av1ΔnifZΔnifB(varied time)]. Control Av1ΔnifZΔnifB(0) was prepared by omitting NifZ/Av2wt/ATP. Av1ΔnifZΔnifB(+NifZ) and Av1ΔnifZΔnifB(+Av2/ATP) were prepared by omitting Av2wt/ATP and NifZ, respectively.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM-67626 (to M.W.R.).
Abbreviation
- FeMoco
iron–molybdenum cofactor.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
The identity of X is unknown but is considered to be C, O, or N (7).
The MoFe protein resulting from deletion of nifZ alone, designated Av1ΔnifZ, has the same P-cluster composition as Av1ΔnifZΔnifB, i.e., one P-cluster in one αβ-dimer and one pair of [4Fe–4S]-like clusters in the other, except that FeMoco is present in the αβ-dimer containing the fully assembled P-cluster.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0704297104/DC1.
The streptavidin-tagged NifZ has, in addition to the 160 amino acids from the NifZ sequence, 10 extra amino acids from the linker and streptavidin tag at the C terminus of the protein. Thus, the molecular mass of the subunit of streptavidin-tagged NifZ, theoretically calculated at 19.2 kDa, is slightly larger than that of nontagged NifZ.
The percentages of changes of both perpendicular- and parallel-mode EPR signals of Av1 ΔnifZΔnifB(varied time) were calculated by setting those of Av1ΔnifZΔnifB(0) as 50%, based on the fact that (i) the magnitude of the perpendicular-mode S = ½ signal of Av1ΔnifZΔnifB(0) represents the P-cluster precursor that can be converted to 50% of the total P-cluster content and (ii) the magnitude of the parallel-mode P2+ signal of Av1ΔnifZΔnifB(0) represents the existing P-cluster that accounts for 50% of the total P-cluster content.
Like Av1ΔnifZΔnifB, Av1ΔnifZ can be further activated upon incubation with NifZ, Av2wt, and MgATP to a similar level (data not shown).
Based on a sequence search using program BLAST (24), NifZ is widely distributed among bacterial organisms, such as Gram-positive bacteria, cyanobacteria, and purple bacteria. There is a highly conserved “NifZ domain,” which consists of 75 amino acid residues at the N-terminal part of the protein.
References
- 1.Burgess BK, Lowe DJ. Chem Rev. 1996;96:2983–3011. doi: 10.1021/cr950055x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Howard JB, Rees DC. Chem Rev. 1996;96:2965–2982. doi: 10.1021/cr9500545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Smith BE. Adv Inorg Chem. 1999;47:159–218. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rees DC, Tezcan FA, Haynes CA, Walton MY, Andrade S, Einsle O, Howard JB. Philos Trans R Soc London A. 2005;363:971–984. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2004.1539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Peters JW, Szilagyi RK. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2006;10:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Peters JW, Stowell MHB, Soltis SM, Finnegan MG, Johnson MK, Rees DC. Biochemistry. 1997;36:1181–1187. doi: 10.1021/bi9626665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Einsle O, Tezcan FA, Andrade SLA, Schmid B, Yoshida M, Howard JB, Rees DC. Science. 2002;297:1696–1700. doi: 10.1126/science.1073877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee SC, Holm RH. Chem Rev. 2004;104:1135–1158. doi: 10.1021/cr0206216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Berlinguette CP, Miyaji T, Zhang Y, Holm RH. Inorg Chem. 2006;45:1997–2007. doi: 10.1021/ic051770k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang Y, Holm RH. Inorg Chem. 2004;43:674–682. doi: 10.1021/ic030259t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang Y, Holm RH. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:3910–3920. doi: 10.1021/ja0214633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zuo JL, Zhou HC, Holm RH. Inorg Chem. 2003;42:4624–4631. doi: 10.1021/ic0301369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ribbe MW, Hu Y, Guo M, Schmid B, Burgess BK. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:23469–23476. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202061200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Corbett MC, Hu Y, Naderi F, Ribbe MW, Hedman B, Hodgson KO. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:28276–28282. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403156200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hu Y, Corbett MC, Fay AW, Webber JA, Hedman B, Hodgson KO, Ribbe MW. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:13825–13830. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506967102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Broach RB, Rupnik K, Hu Y, Fay AW, Cotton M, Ribbe MW, Hales BJ. Biochemistry. 2006;45:15039–15048. doi: 10.1021/bi061697p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schmid B, Ribbe MW, Einsle O, Yoshida M, Thomas LM, Dean DR, Rees DC, Burgess BK. Science. 2002;296:352–356. doi: 10.1126/science.1070010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tal S, Chun TW, Gavini N, Burgess BK. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:10654–10657. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hu Y, Fay AW, Dos Santos PC, Naderi F, Ribbe MW. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:54963–54971. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M408983200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bursey EH, Burgess BK. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:29678–29685. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.45.29678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ribbe MW, Bursey EH, Burgess BK. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:17631–17638. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.23.17631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pierik AJ, Wassink H, Haaker H, Hagen WR. Eur J Biochem. 1993;212:51–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17632.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tittsworth RC, Hales BJ. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:9763–9767. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.White TC, Harris GS, Orme-Johnson WH. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:24007–24016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ribbe MW, Burgess BK. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:5521–5525. doi: 10.1073/pnas.101119498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Burgess BK, Jacobs DB, Stiefel EI. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980;614:196–209. doi: 10.1016/0005-2744(80)90180-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gavini N, Burgess BK. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:21179–21186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Corbin LJ. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984;47:1027–1030. doi: 10.1128/aem.47.5.1027-1030.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.