Skip to main content
PMC home page
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1984 Sep;50(3):367–375. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1984.185

Trends in cervical cancer and carcinoma in situ in Great Britain.

G A Cook, G J Draper
PMCID: PMC1976785  PMID: 6466546

Abstract

Doubts have frequently been expressed about the effectiveness of the screening programme for cervical cancer in Britain. These doubts have been reinforced as a result of recent increases in mortality from this disease among younger women. In this paper we discuss trends in registration and mortality data, relate these to the level of screening, and conclude that screening may in fact have had a considerable impact on mortality rates. There is good evidence that in some age groups there has been a large increase in the incidence of carcinoma in situ of the cervix; it seems likely that the potential increase in cervical cancer incidence and mortality may have been partially prevented as a result of the screening programme. The extent of this effect cannot be quantified precisely because of uncertainties concerning the natural history of cervical cancer, differences in risk for different cohorts, and the possible effects of other factors. It is likely that incidence rates will continue to change, and it will be necessary to monitor these and the screening programme with some care in order to make the best use of the resources available for cervical cytology.

Full text

PDF
367

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alderson M., Donnan S. Hysterectomy rates and their influence upon mortality from carcinoma of the cervix. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1978 Sep;32(3):175–177. doi: 10.1136/jech.32.3.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armstrong B., Holman D. Increasing mortality from cancer of the cervix in young Australian women. Med J Aust. 1981 May 2;1(9):460–462. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1981.tb135734.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bamford P. N., Barber M., Beilby J. O. Changing pattern of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia seen in a family planning clinic. Lancet. 1982 Mar 27;1(8274):747–747. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)92663-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barrett J. C. Age, time and cohort factors in mortality from cancer of the cervix. J Hyg (Lond) 1973 Jun;71(2):253–259. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400022725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beral V. Cancer of the cervix: a sexually transmitted infection? Lancet. 1974 May 25;1(7865):1037–1040. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90432-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourne R. G., Grove W. D. Invasive carcinoma of the cervix in Queensland. Change in incidence and mortality, 1959-1980. Med J Aust. 1983 Feb 19;1(4):156–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burslem R. W. Cervical cytological screening for users of oral contraceptives. Lancet. 1983 Oct 22;2(8356):968–968. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)90482-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. CASE R. A. Cohort analysis of mortality rates as an historical or narrative technique. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1956 Oct;10(4):159–171. doi: 10.1136/jech.10.4.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Draper G. J., Cook G. A. Changing patterns of cervical cancer rates. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Aug 20;287(6391):510–512. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6391.510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Draper G. J. Screening for cervical cancer: revised policy. The recommendations of the DHSS Committee on Gynaecological Cytology. Health Trends. 1982 May;14(2):37–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Green G. H. Rising cervical cancer mortality in young New Zealand women. N Z Med J. 1979 Feb 14;89(629):89–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hill G. B., Adelstein A. M. Cohort mortality from carcinoma of the cervix. Lancet. 1967 Sep 16;2(7516):605–606. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90752-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Macgregor J. E., Teper S. Mortality from carcinoma of cervix uteri in Britain. Lancet. 1978 Oct 7;2(8093):774–776. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)92658-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Osmond C., Gardner M. J., Acheson E. D. Analysis of trends in cancer mortality in England and Wales during 1951-80 separating changes associated with period of birth and period of death. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 Apr 3;284(6321):1005–1008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6321.1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vessey M. P., Lawless M., McPherson K., Yeates D. Neoplasia of the cervix uteri and contraception: a possible adverse effect of the pill. Lancet. 1983 Oct 22;2(8356):930–934. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)90451-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wolfendale M. R., King S., Usherwood M. M. Abnormal cervical smears: are we in for an epidemic? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Aug 20;287(6391):526–528. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6391.526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wright N. H., Vessey M. P., Kenward B., McPherson K., Doll R. Neoplasia and dysplasia of the cervix uteri and contraception: a possible protective effect of the diaphragm. Br J Cancer. 1978 Aug;38(2):273–279. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1978.198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yule R. Mortality from carcinoma of the cervix. Lancet. 1978 May 13;1(8072):1031–1032. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)90751-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES