Abstract
Isoprostanes are prostaglandin isomers produced from arachidonic acid by a free radical-catalyzed mechanism. Urinary excretion of 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α, an isomer of the PGG/H synthase (cyclooxygenase or COX) enzyme product, prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α), has exhibited promise as an index of oxidant stress in vivo. We have developed a quantitative method to measure isoprostane F2α-I, (IPF2α-I) a class I isomer (8-iso-PGF2α is class IV), using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. IPF2α-I is severalfold as abundant in human urine as 8-iso-PGF2α, with mean values of 737 ± 20.6 pg/mg creatinine. Both isoprostanes are formed in a free radical-dependent manner in low density lipoprotein oxidized by copper in vitro. However, IPF2α-I, unlike 8-iso-PGF2α, is not formed in a COX-dependent manner by platelets activated by thrombin or collagen in vitro. Similarly, COX inhibition in vivo has no effect on IPF2α-I. Neither serum IPF2α-I, an index of cellular capacity to generate the isoprostane, nor urinary excretion of IPF2α-I, an index of actual generation in vivo, is depressed by aspirin or indomethacin. In contrast, both serum thromboxane B2 and urinary excretion of its 11-dehydro metabolite are depressed by the COX inhibitors. Although serum 8-iso-PGF2α formation is substantially depressed by COX inhibitors, urinary excretion of the compound is unaffected. Urinary IPF2α-I is elevated in cigarette smokers compared with controls (1525 ± 180 versus 740 ± 40 pg/mg creatinine; P < 0.01) and is highly correlated with urinary 8-iso-PGF2α (r = 0.9; P < 0.001). Urinary IPF2α-I is a novel index of lipid peroxidation in vivo, which can be measured with precision and sensitivity. It is an abundant F2-isoprostane formed in a free radical- but not COX-dependent manner. Although 8-iso-PGF2α may be formed as a minor product of COX, this pathway contributes trivially, if at all, to levels in urine. Urinary excretion of both isoprostanes is elevated in cigarette smokers.
Isoprostanes are chemically stable prostaglandin (PG)-like compounds that are produced independent of the cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme by free radical-catalyzed peroxidation of arachidonic acid (AA) in situ in membrane phospholipids (1). They are cleaved by phospholipases, circulate in plasma, and are excreted in urine (2). F2-isoprostanes are isomers of PGF2α, a natural product derived from COX and PGF synthase. Depending on the site of the original arachidonyl radical formed, four groups of regioisomers of the F2-isoprostanes may be produced upon rearrangement, oxygenation, and reduction, each of which may comprise 16 isomers. Thus, in theory, up to 64 different F2-isoprostanes can be generated (3, 4).
Semiquantitative estimates of their generation have been based on enzyme immunoassay and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), the latter using deuterated PGF2α as internal standard (5, 6). We have previously developed a specific method to measure a class IV F2-isoprostane, 8-iso- PGF2α, using an 18O2-labeled internal standard (7). Although this compound is produced in vitro and in vivo via free radical peroxidation of AA, we have shown that 8-iso-PGF2α is also a minor product of platelet COX-1 and monocyte COX-2 dependent metabolism of AA in vitro (7, 8). It may also be formed in a COX-dependent manner in serum ex vivo (4, 9). However, COX-dependent formation seems to contribute little, if at all, to levels of 8-iso-PGF2α measured in the urine of cigarette smokers (9), a syndrome of COX-1 activation (10).
Given that our original data suggest that 8-iso-PGF2α, but not other F2-isoprostanes, might be formed also by a COX-dependent mechanism (7), we have developed a specific GC/MS assay for IPF2α-I, a structurally distinct (class I) F2-isoprostane (11). We demonstrate that IPF2α-I is formed coincidental with conventional markers of lipid peroxidation in low density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidized by copper in vitro. Although antioxidants prevent formation of either isoprostane under these conditions, IPF2α-I, unlike 8-iso-PGF2α, is not formed in a COX-dependent manner by aggregating platelets in vitro or in serum ex vivo. IPF2α-I is excreted in human urine, where it is more abundant than 8-iso-PGF2α. Furthermore, COX inhibition in vivo, by either low dose aspirin or indomethacin, fails to suppress urinary levels of either isoprostane. These results suggest that measurement of urinary IPF2α-I represents a novel approach to the noninvasive assessment of oxidant stress in humans. These data also support the notion that COX activity contributes trivially, if at all, to urinary 8-iso-PGF2α under physiological conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Reagents.
18O2-labeled 8-iso-PGF2α was prepared as previously described by Pickett and Murphy (12). IPF2α-I was synthesized as previously described (11). The tetradeutero derivative, 17,17,18,18-teradeuterated IPF2α-I, was prepared by a modified synthesis (unpublished results). N,N-diisopropylethylamine, pentafluorobenzyl (PFB) bromide, dodecane, N,N′-dicyclohexyl-carbodiimide, 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide methiodide, copper sulfate (CuSO4), and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) were purchased from Sigma. Bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide was purchased from Supelco. Pyridine was purchased from Mallinckrodt. All other solvents were obtained from Burdick and Jackson.
Isoprostane Extraction and Purification.
Urine samples, 0.1 ml, were spiked with 300 pg of tetradeuterated IPF2α-I and then mixed well and allowed to equilibrate for 15 min at room temperature. The volume was brought up to 1 ml with phosphate buffer, pH 7.0. Then, 250 mg of 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide methiodide was added, and the sample was allowed to stand for 30 min at room temperature. It was then extracted on a RapidTrace (Zymark, Hopkinton, MA) solid phase extraction (SPE) workstation, using reverse phase SPE cartridges (C18 EC, 100 mg; International Sorbent Technology, Mid Glamorgan, U.K.) and the following parameters. The cartridge was conditioned with 3 ml of EtOH (2 ml/min) and washed with 0.5 ml of phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 (2 ml/min). The sample was loaded (1 ml/min) onto the cartridge, which was washed with 1 ml (pH 7.0) of buffer (2 ml/min), followed by 1 ml of 35% EtOH/pH 7.0 buffer (2 ml/min). The cartridge was then flushed three times with 5 ml of hexane (15 ml/min) followed by insufflation three times with 5 ml of air (30 ml/min). It was then eluted with 1 ml of EtOAc (1 ml/min) and dried under a stream of N2, dissolved in 25 μl of MeOH, and applied onto a silica gel TLC plate (LK6D, Whatman). The plate was developed in 3% MeOH/EtOAc, along with a separate plate on which was spotted 2 μg of authentic IPF2α-I lactone, dipped in CuSO4, and heated on a hot plate. The lactone was prepared by dissolving the standard in 25 μl of N,N′-dicyclohexyl-carbodiimide (10 mg/ml) and allowing it to stand for 30 min at room temperature. The appropriate zone was scraped, extracted from 100 μl of H2O with 1 ml EtOAc, and dried under N2. It was then dissolved in 10 μl each of methanol and 15% KOH/H2O and allowed to stand for 30 min at room temperature. After addition of 100 μl of 1 N HCl, the sample was extracted with 1 ml of EtOAc and dried. N,N-diisopropylethylamine (10 μl) and 10% PFB bromide in acetonitrile (20 μl) were added and allowed to stand for 10 min. After drying, the sample was dissolved in 25 μl of MeOH and applied to another TLC plate, which was developed in EtOAc. A second plate, to identify the zone for scraping, was loaded with 2 μg of IPF2α-I PFB ester, developed alongside and visualized as above. The scrapings were extracted from water as above and dried. Pyridine and bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide, 10 μl each, were added to form the trimethylsilyl (TMS) ether derivative, allowed to stand for 10 min, and then were dried. The sample was dissolved in 20 μl of dodecane for GC/MS analysis.
8-iso-PGF2α was measured as previously described (7). Serum thromboxane (Tx) formation, measured as its stable hydrolysis product, TxB2, and the Tx metabolite in urine, 11-dehydro TxB2, were prepared for analysis by GC/MS as previously described (10, 13).
Demonstration of IPF Class Selectivity.
A mix of approximately 100 ng each of chemically synthesized IPF2α-I, IPF2α-II, IPF2α-III, 8-iso-PGF2α, and 12-iso-PGF2α were dried in a microcentrifuge tube, and 100 μl of urine was added, vortexed, and allowed to stand for 15 min. It was then prepared as described above, except that the second TLC was omitted. As a control, an equivalent amount of the mix was subjected to saponification and extraction as described above and derivatized as the PFB ester, TMS ether. GC/MS analysis was as described below.
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry.
A Fisons MD-800 mass spectrometer, equipped with a Fisons 8000 gas chromatograph and a Fisons AS-800 autosampler, was used for all analyses. The MS was operated in the negative ion electron capture ionization mode, using ammonia as the moderating gas. Ions monitored were m/z 569 and 573 for IPF2α-I and the internal standard, respectively. Other eicosanoids were analyzed as previously described (7–9). A 30-m, 0.25-mm i.d., 0.25-μm phase-thickness DB5-MS column was used with a temperature program of 1 min isothermal at 190°C followed by heating at 20°C/min to 320°C. The carrier gas was helium.
Formation of IPF2α-I During Lipid Peroxidation.
To assess the time course of formation of IPF2α-I during copper-catalyzed lipid peroxidation, the following experiments were performed. The protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was obtained from participants in the study. After an overnight fast, blood from healthy normolipemic volunteers (two males, two females, age 21–38 years) was collected, and LDL was prepared by sequential density gradient ultracentrifugation according to a previously described method that minimizes oxidation (8). Protein concentration, TBARS, lipid hydroperoxides, and water-soluble antioxidants were measured as previously described (14–17). Free and phospholipid-bound 8-iso-PGF2α and IPF2α-I were extracted using 10 ml of ice-cold Folch solution (chloroform/methanol; 2:1, vol/vol). The organic phase containing the extracted lipids was dried under nitrogen; then, 5 ml of aqueous KOH (15%) was added, and the mixture was incubated at 45°C for 1 hr to effect hydrolysis and release of 8-iso-PGF2α and IPF2α-I.
COX-1-Dependent Formation of Isoprostanes in Activated Human Platelets.
Platelets were harvested as previously described (7). Platelet aggregation was studied in WP using a PAP-4 model Biodata aggregometer (Biodata, Hatsboro, PA), at 37°, in siliconized cuvettes with continuous stirring. Supernatants were collected and stored at −80°C until analysis in the presence of 0.01% BHT.
COX-Dependent and Independent Isoprostane Excretion in Human Urine.
To investigate the possibility that COX might contribute to urinary IPF2α-I, we assessed the comparative effects of two distinct COX inhibitors, aspirin and indomethacin, on urinary excretion of both IPF2α-I and 8-iso-PGF2α. Both isoprostanes were also measured in serum to assess the capacity for a COX-dependent contribution to their formation. Eight apparently healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study (four males and four females, age 21–38 years), which was scrutinized and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Pennsylvania. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. They were all nonsmokers, and they did not take any drugs or vitamin supplements for 4 weeks before the study. Samples (urine, plasma, serum) were obtained at 10 and 5 days before aspirin and immediately before (day 0) and after 10 days treatment with 100 mg aspirin/day. Following a 2-week washout period, samples were obtained after acute (2 hr) dosing with 50 mg of indomethacin. Six-hour urine collections were obtained, and following the addition of 0.01% BHT as an antioxidant, a 50-ml aliquot was stored at −80°C until analysis. Blood was withdrawn, without stasis, from an antecubital vein using a 21G needle into a syringe containing 3.8% sodium citrate.
Studies of Isoprostane Stability in Human Urine.
Urine specimens (n = 3) were analyzed immediately after collection. They were also studied after 2, 4, and 10 days at room temperature, at +4°C, at −20°C, or at −80°C, to investigate the possibility that the compounds could be generated by auto-oxidation. Furthermore, 10 μg of [8H2]arachidonic acid was added to each sample to evaluate any artifactual formation of the isoprostanes during sample processing.
Cigarette Smoking.
To address the hypothesis that urinary IPF2α-I would be elevated in a human syndrome of oxidant stress, we studied cigarette smokers. Six healthy male volunteers who had been smoking 20–30 cigarettes per day and six nonsmoking healthy controls collected 6-hr urines for isoprostane analysis. The volunteers were aged 31–45 years and abstained from all medication for at least 2 weeks prior to the collection.
Statistical Analysis.
Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance followed by the Student’s t test when appropriate. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.
RESULTS
Assay Development.
IPF2α-I was prepared as previously described (11). The tetradeutero analog 17,17,18,18-d4-IPF2α-I was prepared as described for the parent compound. It is approximately 93% pure, with the remainder being an unidentified isomer that elutes slightly later on the GC. The “blank” of the internal standard, i.e., the amount of unlabeled contaminant, is less than 1%. A representative selected ion-monitoring chromatogram for IPF2α-I in human urine is depicted in Fig. 1. To assess the reproducibility of the IPF2α-I assay, 100-μl replicates of urine from three individuals were assayed six times on each of 3 days. The mean ± SEM values were 738.0 ± 17.2, 726.7 ± 26.6, and 748.6 ± 10.7 pg/mg creatinine. The overall mean ± SEM for all the sample analyses (n = 18) was 737.1 ± 20.6 pg/mg creatinine. The assay was linear over the range of 20–640 pg of authentic IPF2α-I to 100-μl urine aliquots. The ability of the SPE and TLC components of the assay to separate IPFs of class I from representatives of class II, III, and IV is shown in Fig. 2. Although approximately 45% of IPF2α-I was present after lactonization, SPE, TLC, saponification, and derivatization as the PFB ester, TMS ether, only about 0.04% of the other classes were present; this represents an enrichment of over 3 orders of magnitude. This selectivity takes place mainly on the TLC, where the Rf of IPF2α-I lactone is 0.2; that of classes I, II, and IV, as well as unlactonized class I compounds, is <0.02.
COX Inhibition of Isoprostane Formation.
Urinary 8-iso-PGF2α was measured in aliquots obtained in two different days (days −10 and −5) in untreated volunteers. The mean values were 93 ± 10 and 98 ± 12 pg/mg creatinine (Fig. 3A). The data ranged from 75 to 150 pg/mg creatinine and the intra- and intersubject coefficients of variation were ±5% and ±6%, respectively. To assess the effects of COX inhibition, 100 mg of aspirin was administered daily for 10 days. Efficient COX inhibition was demonstrated by suppression of urinary 11-dehydro TxB2 from pretreatment values of 485 ± 12 and 500 ± 15 to 37.5 ± 2 pg/mg creatinine (P < 0.001) (Fig. 3C). Despite this, urinary 8-iso-PGF2α on aspirin treatment (105 ± 10 pg/mg creatinine) did not differ from pretreatment levels. Following a period of washout to allow recovery of the aspirin effect, COX inhibition was again assessed by administration of indomethacin. Again, urinary 11-dehydro TxB2 was suppressed (38 ± 2.7 pg/mg creatinine), but urinary 8-iso-PGF2α (103 ± 6 pg/mg creatinine) was unaltered from control values. These data indicate that COX inhibition in vivo in volunteers does not alter urinary 8-iso-PGF2α.
The effect of COX inhibition on urinary IPF2α-I excretion was also negative. Urinary levels of the two control days were 781 ± 66 and 770 ± 70 pg/mg creatinine and ranged from 650 to 950 pg/mg creatinine. The intra- and intersubject variation in excretion was ±5% and ±4%. Levels were considerably (P < 0.0001) higher than those of 8-iso-PGF2α. Again, neither aspirin administration (789 ± 50 pg/mg creatinine) nor indomethacin dosing (769 ± 58 pg/mg creatinine) significantly depressed urinary IPF2α-I, despite the effects of these regimens on urinary thromboxane metabolite excretion (Fig. 3B). Similar results were obtained when the isoprostanes were measured in plasma. Thus, neither 8-iso-PGF2α (19.6 ± 2 versus 20 ± 1.5 pg/ml) nor IPF2α-I (80 ± 4.2 versus 78.5 ± 7.9 pg/ml) was suppressed by aspirin or indomethacin (21 ± 1.4 and 77.1 ± 6.8 pg/ml, respectively).
To assess the influence of COX inhibition on the capacity to generate these compounds rather than on their actual generation in vivo, we measured 8-iso-PGF2α, IPF2α-I, and TxB2 in serum. Both the aspirin regimen (196 ± 6 versus 18 ± 2.4 ng/ml) and indomethacin (15 ± 1.5 ng/ml) significantly depressed serum levels of TxB2, the hydrolysis product of TxA2 (Fig. 4C). Although much less of the compound was formed in serum than TxB2, depression of serum 8-iso-PGF2α by both aspirin (228 ± 18 versus 28.2 ± 2 pg/ml) and indomethacin (26.6 ± 2.4 pg/ml) was also significant (Fig. 4A). These results indicate the capacity for COX-dependent formation of minor amounts of this compound, consistent with our previous observations (7). In contrast to our findings with 8-iso-PGF2α, neither aspirin (80 ± 2.2 versus 74.5 ± 5.5 pg/ml) nor indomethacin (80 ± 2.2 versus 79 ± 3.7 pg/ml) depressed serum IPF2α-I (Fig. 5B), suggesting that blood cells do not express the capacity to form this compound in a COX-dependent manner.
To investigate the effects of COX activation on the formation of the two isoprostanes in more detail, we studied platelet activation in vitro. Human platelets possess the COX-1 isoform (18), and we have previously demonstrated that they exhibit the capacity to generate 8-iso-PGF2α as a minor COX product (7). Again, activation of platelets with either thrombin or collagen markedly increased 8-iso-PGF2α formation. This response was abolished by pretreatment of the platelets with the COX inhibitor, aspirin (100 μM), but not by the antioxidant BHT (20 μM) (Fig. 5). IPF2α-I, by contrast, was unaltered by platelet COX-1 activation.
We also investigated whether the two F2-isoprostanes could be formed ex vivo by autooxidation in urine. We found that the amounts in urine obtained from normal volunteers were not increased by leaving the specimens at room temperature for up to 10 days. No difference was also observed when these levels were compared with those obtained in specimens stored at 4°C, −20°C, or −80°C for the same period (Table 1). Moreover, no artifactual formation of the isoprostanes was detected during the sampling and processing, as no deuterated form of either of the two isoprostanes was found (data not shown).
Table 1.
8-iso-PGF2α, pg/mg creatinine
|
IPF2α-I, pg/mg creatinine
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 2 | Day 4 | Day 10 | Day 2 | Day 4 | Day 10 | |
RT | 95.5 ± 5.5 | 103 ± 6.5 | 94 ± 5 | 745 ± 25 | 755 ± 28 | 760 ± 38 |
+4°C | 97.0 ± 5 | 95.5 ± 5.5 | 101 ± 4 | 759 ± 40 | 755 ± 25 | 740 ± 28 |
−20°C | 93.5 ± 3.5 | 98 ± 5.2 | 96 ± 6.3 | 766 ± 26 | 747 ± 27.3 | 757 ± 23 |
−80°C | 100 ± 6 | 93.5 ± 3.9 | 94 ± 5 | 735 ± 36 | 770 ± 38 | 756 ± 32 |
Six-hour urine specimens were collected from three apparently healthy individuals. Aliquots (50 ml) were kept at different conditions for different periods of time (2, 4, and 10 days). Isoprostane levels were measured as described in Methods. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. RT, room temperature.
LDL Peroxidation.
The time course of LDL peroxidation in response to CuSO4 (10 μM) was assessed in samples from four normal volunteers (two males, two females, age 21–38 years). Total 8-iso-PGF2α levels were 0.35 ± 0.04, 1.10 ± 0.08, 1.14 ± 0.09, 3.63 ± 0.18, 5.56 ± 0.31, and 8.45 ± 0.38 ng/mg LDL protein at 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 24 hr after addition of copper, respectively. In the same samples, IPF2α-I levels rose from 1.1 ± 0.1 to 27.8 ± 1.1 ng/mg LDL protein at 24 hr. In both cases, pretreatment with the antioxidant, BHT (20 μM), prevented the formation of both 8-iso-PGF2α and IPF2α-I. Thus, both isoprostanes were formed in a free radical-dependent manner in this system. More conventional indices of lipid peroxidation, such as TBARS and lipid hydroperoxides, closely correlated with IPF2α-I in oxidized LDL (Table 2). Incubation of LDL with CuS04 (10 μM) caused the endogenous antioxidants α-tocopherol, β-carotene, and lycopene to decrease significantly (Table 2). This was followed by consumption of lutein/zeaxanthine and cryptoxanthine (data not shown).
Table 2.
0 hr | 0.5 hr | 1 hr | 3 hr | 6 hr | 24 hr | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBARS (nmol/mg LDL) | 0.45 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 5.2 ± 0.4 | 10.4 ± 0.35 | 17.6 ± 0.5 | 27.0 ± 0.45 |
Hydroperoxides (nmol/mg LDL) | 46.0 ± 15 | 58.0 ± 18 | 128.0 ± 25 | 200 ± 20 | 400 ± 22 | 590 ± 35 |
IPF2α-I (ng/mg LDL) | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.09 | 2.15 ± 0.1 | 3.6 ± 0.25 | 9.8 ± 0.4 | 27.8 ± 0.85 |
α-Tocopherol (%) | 100 | 51 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
β-Carotene (%) | 100 | 62 | 23 | ND | ND | ND |
Lycopene (%) | 100 | 55 | 19 | ND | ND | ND |
LDL (0.4 mg protein/ml) was incubated with 10 μM CuSO4 at 37°C under air for 0–24 hr. Aliquots were withdrawn at time intervals and analyzed for levels of TBARS, lipid hydroperoxides, and IPF2α-I. Levels of LDL antioxidants were also measured and expressed as percentage of their initial concentrations. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of four experiments. ND, not detectable.
Cigarette Smoking.
Both urinary IPF2α-I (1525 ± 180 versus 740 ± 40 pg/ng creatine) and 8-iso-PGF2α (270 ± 36 versus 95 ± 10 pg/mg creatine) were markedly elevated in the smokers compared with the nonsmoking controls. Excretion of both isoprostanes was highly correlated (r = 0.9; P < 0.001).
DISCUSSION
Isoprostanes are non-COX-derived prostaglandin isomers, products of arachidonic acid which result from free radical-catalyzed lipid peroxidation (19, 20). They are formed initially esterified in membrane phospholipids, from which they are presumptively cleaved by a phospholipase A2 (1), circulate in plasma, and are excreted in urine (2). Given their chemical stability, their formation by a specific, free radical-catalyzed pathway and the potential precision and sensitivity of their measurement in biological fluids by mass spectrometry (7), they seem to offer promise as indices of free radical generation in integrated systems. The present confusion as to the role of oxidant stress in human disease, the indirect approaches to determination of an antioxidant dose of common vitamins in humans (21–24), and the conflicting data emanating from clinical trials of such vitamins (25–27) suggest that the validation of such an index of oxidant stress in vivo is timely.
Several approaches to the measurement of isoprostanes have been adopted. These include the estimation of “total” F2-isoprostanes, using the prostaglandin, PGF2α as an internal standard, the use of immunoassays directed at specific compounds, and the measurement of specific isoprostanes using GC/MS. Given that up to 64 such isomers in 4 structural classes may be formed from peroxidation of arachidonic acid (3, 4), it would seem judicious at this point to measure specific compounds. Taking this approach, we developed a method to measure 8-iso-PGF2α, reportedly an abundant F2-isoprostane in humans (28) and one which exhibits biological actions in vitro. 8-iso-PGF2α modulates platelet function, constricts vascular smooth muscle, and may act as a mitogen (29–31), effects which are blocked by pharmacological antagonists of thromboxane receptors. It is unknown whether these effects have any relevance to its role in vivo and, if so, whether they are transduced via thromboxane receptors or related receptors (32). Measurement of 8-iso-PGF2α in urine offers promise as a noninvasive approach to measurement of oxidant stress in vivo (33). Thus, excretion is increased dose-dependently by cigarette smoking and falls upon quitting (9). Similarly, excretion increases during coronary reperfusion after preceding ischemia in animal models and in humans (34, 35). Both cigarette smoking (36, 37) and ischemia-reperfusion (38, 39) are thought to be models of oxidant stress in humans.
However, when we turned our attention to the mechanisms of cellular formation of 8-iso-PGF2α, our results were surprising. Thus, although it could be generated in a free radical-dependent manner (8), 8-iso-PGF2α was also a minor product of COX-1 in activated human platelets and of COX-2 in human monocytes (7, 8). These results were confirmed by others in human monocytes and in rat mesangial cells (40,41). Given that COX activation and oxidant stress might coincide in clinical settings such as smoking, ischemia-reperfusion, and inflammation, such observations questioned the usefulness of urinary 8-iso-PGF2α as an index of oxidant stress in vivo.
To address this issue, we took two approaches. The first was to assess the effects of COX inhibition on the capacity of blood cells to form 8-iso-PGF2α, as reflected by measurements in serum (9), and on actual in vivo generation of the compound, as reflected by its excretion in urine. Inhibition of platelet COX-1 did not depress urinary 8-iso-PGF2α, despite a reduction in serum 8-iso-PGF2α and inhibition of COX, as reflected by suppression of serum TxB2 and excretion of urinary 11-dehydro TxB2 (9). Similarly, we have found that controlled administration of bacterial lipopolysaccharide results in a major increment in prostaglandin metabolite excretion in urine and regulated expression of COX-1 and COX-2 ex vivo in volunteers (42). Lipopolysaccharide administration also increases urinary 8-iso-PGF2α, which, unlike the prostaglandin metabolites, is not suppressed by COX inhibitors (B. McAdam and G.A.F., unpublished data). These data suggest that although the capacity for COX-dependent formation of 8-iso-PGF2α may be expressed ex vivo, this pathway contributes in an undetectable manner to urinary levels of the compound, even in syndromes of COX induction.
The second approach that we have adopted is illustrated in this communication. Initial observations (7, 43) and theoretical considerations (44) suggested that 8-iso-PGF2α was unusual among F2-isoprostanes in being formed by COX. To address this possibility, we synthesized an internal standard for a structurally distinct isoprostane, IPF2α-I. This compound is a member of class I F2-isoprostanes as distinct from 8-iso-PGF2α (class IV). Class I IPFs, by virtue of the C5 hydroxyl group, are able to form a cyclic lactone. Lactonization imparts to them a distinctly less polar nature and enables this class to be conveniently separated from IPFs of classes II, III, and IV by a wide margin, using TLC. We now report that IPF2α-I is not only present in human urine but more abundant than 8-iso-PGF2α. We demonstrate its formation, along with 8-iso-PGF2α in LDL oxidized by copper in vitro. IPF2α-I is also the more abundant of the two isoprostanes formed under these conditions, and the kinetics of its formation closely mirror those of more conventional indices of lipid peroxidation, as well as consumption of endogenous antioxidants, in LDL. We find no evidence for COX-dependent formation of IPF2α-I. Thus, activation of human platelets, by thrombin or collagen, results in COX-dependent formation of 8-iso-PGF2α but not IPF2α-I. Similarly, administration of the COX inhibitors, aspirin and indomethacin, partially suppresses serum 8-iso-PGF2α, but not IPF2α-I, ex vivo in the volunteers. The results with 8-iso-PGF2α confirm and extend our previous observations of aspirin effects on this index of cellular capacity to form the compound in nonsmoking (5) and smoking (9) volunteers.
Despite the effects of both COX inhibitor regimens on 8-iso generation ex vivo, urinary excretion of the compound was unaffected by either aspirin or indomethacin. However, we did observe marked suppression of the 11-dehydro metabolite of thromboxane, a COX product of platelets and macrophages. Similarly, urinary IPF2α-I was unaffected by these therapeutic maneuvers. Finally, we confirmed that urinary IPF2α is increased in cigarette smokers, a syndrome of oxidant stress in vivo. As expected, we confirmed that IPF2α-I was the more abundant isoprostane in the smokers’ urine. Consistent with their formation by a common mechanism, urinary levels of both isoprostanes were highly correlated.
The utility of F2-isoprostane measurement in settings of oxidative stress has now been validated by several groups. Several mass spectrometric approaches have been utilized. However, attempts to use a single internal standard to quantitate all of the isomers present in urine depend on reproducible recovery of all these species and the lack of any other compounds contributing to the ion current within the GC elution region of the F2-isoprostanes. The former is optimized when sample purification is minimized, the latter when purification is maximized. Monitoring a single isomer is thus theoretically attractive, but purification of one isoform from the many others present results in a technically demanding and time-consuming sample preparation protocol. The task of purification of a single isomer is drastically reduced by taking advantage of the ability of the class I isoprostanes, such as IPF2α-I, to form a cyclic lactone, easily separable from the three other classes.
Our results suggest that IPF2α-I is a particularly appealing index of lipid peroxidation in vivo. It can be measured with precision and sensitivity, exhibits low intra- and intersubject variation in volunteers, and is more abundant than 8-iso-PGF2α in human urine. Unlike 8-iso-PGF2α, it exhibits no capacity for COX-dependent formation and may be used to verify elevations in urinary 8-iso-PGF2α in syndromes where COX induction and oxidant stress may coincide. Parenthetically, current evidence suggests that COX-dependent formation contributes trivially, if at all, to urinary excretion of 8-iso-PGF2α.
Acknowledgments
We thank National Institutes of Health for support from Grants MO IRR0040, HL54500, and DK44730 and a grant-in-aid from the American Heart Association. We gratefully acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation for an AMX-360 NMR instrument (CHE 9013145) and from the Turkish Ministry of Education for a doctoral fellowship (to M.A.). G.A.F. is the Robinette Foundation Professor of Cardiovascular Medicine.
ABBREVIATIONS
- PG
prostaglandin
- COX
cyclooxygenase
- SPE
solid phase extraction
- GC/MS
gas chromatography/mass spectrometry
- AA
arachidonic acid
- Tx
thromboxane
- LDL
low density lipoprotein
- PFB
pentafluorobenzyl
- BHT
butylated hydroxytoluene
- TMS
trimethylsilyl
References
- 1.Morrow J D, Awad J A, Boss H J, Blair I A, Roberts L J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:10721–10725. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Awad J A, Morrow J D, Takahashi K, Roberts L J. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:4161–4169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Waugh R J, Murphy R C. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 1996;7:490–499. doi: 10.1016/1044-0305(95)00709-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hwang S-W, Adiyaman M, Khanapure S P, Schio L, Rokach J. J Am Chem Soc. 1994;116:10829–10830. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wang Z, Ciabattoni G, Creminon C, Lawson J, FitzGerald G A, Patrono C, Maclouf J. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;275:94–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Morrow J D, Roberts L J. Methods Enzymol. 1994;233:163–174. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(94)33019-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Praticò D, Lawson J A, FitzGerald G A. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:9800–9808. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.17.9800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Praticò D, FitzGerald G A. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:8919–8924. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.15.8919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Reilly M, Delanty N, Lawson J A, FitzGerald G A. Circulation. 1996;94:19–25. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.1.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nowak J, Murray J J, Oates J A, FitzGerald G A. Circulation. 1987;76:6–14. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.76.1.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Adiyaman M, Lawson J A, Hwang S W, Khanapure S P, FitzGerald G A, Rokach J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37:4849–4852. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pickett W C, Murphy R C. Anal Biochem. 1981;111:115–121. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(81)90237-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Catella F, Healy D, Lawson J, FitzGerald G A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83:5861–5865. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.16.5861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lowry O H, Rosebrough M J, Farr A L, Randall R J. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Iuliano L, Praticò D, Ghiselli A, Bonavita M S, Violi F. Lipids. 1992;27:349–353. doi: 10.1007/BF02536149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nourooz-Zadeh J, Taajaddini-Sarmandi J, Wolff S P. Anal Biochem. 1994;220:403–409. doi: 10.1006/abio.1994.1357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Iuliano L, Colavita A R, Camastra C, Bello V, Quintarelli C, Alessandroni M, Piovella F, Violi F. Br J Pharmacol. 1996;119:1438–1446. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb16056.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Funk C, Funk L B, Kennedy M, Pong A, FitzGerald G A. FASEB J. 1991;5:2304–2312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Morrow J D, Harris T M, Roberts L J. Anal Biochem. 1990;184:1–10. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(90)90002-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Delanty N, Reilly M, Praticò D, Fitzgerald D J, Lawson J A, FitzGerald G A. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996;42:15–19. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1996.03804.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Princen H M G, van Poppel G, Vogelezang C, Buytenhek R, Kok F J. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1992;12:554–562. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.12.5.554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Reaven P D, Witztum J L. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1993;13:601–608. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.13.4.601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Belcher J D, Balla J, Balla G, Jacobs D R, Gross M, Jacob H S, Vercellotti G M. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1993;13:1779–1789. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.13.12.1779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Levine M, Conry-Cantilena C C, Wang Y, Welch R W, Washko P W, Dhariwal K R, Park J B, Lazarev A, Graumlich J F, King J, Cantilena L R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;93:3704–3709. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.8.3704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hertog M G L, Feskens E J M, Hollman P C H, Katan M B, Kromhout D. Lancet. 1993;342:1007–1111. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92876-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Stephens N G, Parson A, Schofield P M, Kelly F, Cheeseman K, Mitchinson M J, Brown M J. Lancet. 1996;347:781–786. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90866-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rapola J M, Virtamo J, Ripatti S, Huttunen J K, Albanes D, Taylor P R, Heinonen O P. Lancet. 1997;349:1715–1720. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)01234-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Morrow J D, Minton T A, Badr K F, Roberts L J. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994;1210:244–248. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(94)90128-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Morrow J D, Minton T A, Roberts L J. Prostaglandins. 1992;44:155–163. doi: 10.1016/0090-6980(92)90077-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Banerjee M, Kang K H, Morrow J D, Roberts L J, Newman J H. Am J Physiol. 1992;263:H660–H663. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1992.263.3.H660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fukunaga M, Makita N, Roberts L J, Morrow J D, Takahashi K, Badr K F. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:C1619–C1624. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1993.264.6.C1619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Praticò D, Smyth E, Violi F, FitzGerald G A. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:14916–14924. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.25.14916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Patrono C, FitzGerald G A. Arterioscl Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:2309–2315. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.17.11.2309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Delanty N, Reilly M, Praticó D, Lawson J A, McCarthy J, Wood F, Ohnishi S T, Fitzgerald D J, FitzGerald G A. Circulation. 1997;95:2492–2499. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.11.2492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Reilly M, Delanty N, Roy L, O’Callaghan P, Crean P, FitzGerald G A. Circulation. 1997;96:3314–3320. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.10.3314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Folsom A R, Wu K W, Rosamond W D, Sharrett A R, Chambless L E. Circulation. 1997;96:1102–1108. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.4.1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Miller E R, Appel L J, Jiang L, Risby T H. Circulation. 1997;96:1097–1101. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.4.1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bolli R, Zughaib M, Li X-Y, Tang X-L, Sun J-Z, Triana J F, McCay P B. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:1066–1084. doi: 10.1172/JCI118093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sakamoto A, Ohnishi S T, Ohnishi T, Ogawa R. Free Radic Biol Med. 1991;11:385–391. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(91)90155-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Patrignani P, Santini G, Panara M R, Sciulli M G, Greco A, Rotondo M T, Di Giamberardino M, Maclouf J, Ciabattoni G, Patrono C. Br J Pharmacol. 1996;118:1285–1293. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb15535.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Klein T, Reutter F, Schweer H, Seyberth H W, Nüsing R M. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997;282:1658–1665. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.McAdam B V, FitzGerald G A. In: New Targets in Inflammation. Bazan N, Vane J R, editors. London: Kluwer; 1996. pp. 117–123. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hecker M, Ullrich V, Fischer C, Meese C O. Eur J Biochem. 1987;169:113–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb13587.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Corey E J, Shih C, Shih N-Y, Shimoji K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984;25:5013–5016. [Google Scholar]