Skip to main content
British Journal of Experimental Pathology logoLink to British Journal of Experimental Pathology
. 1972 Oct;53(5):485–491.

Role of Spleen in Endotoxin Poisoning and Reticuloendothelial Function

M K Agarwal, Monique Parant, Francine Parant
PMCID: PMC2072476  PMID: 5083877

Abstract

The nature of cellular factors in host response to endotoxin was determined by studying various phases of reactivity to endotoxin in splenectomized and sham operated mice. Spleen ablation by itself actually increased the resistance of animals to endotoxin lethality and the absence of spleen did not interfere with either the development or expression of tolerance to the lethal effects of the toxin. The clearance rates of carbon and of endotoxin were normal after splenectomy and increased in conjunction with RES activation associated with endotoxin tolerance, both in sham operated and the splenectomized animals. From these results, it is concluded that subtle and specific adaptations of hepatic RE elements and/or critical metabolic functions play a determining role in endotoxicosis. Furthermore, the presence of spleen does not seem to be required for opsonization, phagocytosis and removal of either nonspecific, inert colloidal particles such as carbon, or of biological materials such as endotoxin. Pertinence of these findings to splenectomized patients is indicated.

Full text

PDF
490

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Agarwal M. K., Berry L. J. Effect of actinomycin-D on RES and development of tolerance to endotoxin in mice. J Reticuloendothel Soc. 1968 Aug;5(4):353–367. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BENACERRAF B., SEBESTYEN M. M. Effect of bacterial endotoxins on the reticuloendothelial system. Fed Proc. 1957 Sep;16(3):860–867. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BENNETT I. L., Jr, CLUFF L. E. Bacterial pyrogens. Pharmacol Rev. 1957 Dec;9(4):427–479. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FREEDMAN H. H. Passive transfer of protection against lethality of homologous heterologous endotoxins. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1959 Nov;102:504–506. doi: 10.3181/00379727-102-25296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. NOYES H. E., McINTURF C. R., BLAHUTA G. J. Studies on distribution of Escherichia coli endotoxin in mice. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1959 Jan;100(1):65–68. doi: 10.3181/00379727-100-24525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. RUTENBURG S. H., RUTENBURG A. M., SMITH E. E., FINE J. ON THE NATURE OF TOLERANCE OF ENDOTOXIN. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1965 Mar;118:620–623. doi: 10.3181/00379727-118-29921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rutenburg S., Skarnes R., Palmerio C., Fine J. Detoxification of endotoxin by perfusion of liver and spleen. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1967 Jun;125(2):455–459. doi: 10.3181/00379727-125-32118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Skarnes R. C. In vivo interaction of endotoxin with a plasma lipoprotein having esterase activity. J Bacteriol. 1968 Jun;95(6):2031–2034. doi: 10.1128/jb.95.6.2031-2034.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Skarnes R. C. The inactivation of endotoxin after interaction with certain proteins of normal serum. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966 Jun 30;133(2):644–662. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb52395.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Experimental Pathology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES