Skip to main content
British Medical Journal logoLink to British Medical Journal
. 1954 Aug 14;2(4884):394–396. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4884.394

Disadvantages of the Rectal Swab in Diagnosis of Diarrhoea

Mair E M Thomas
PMCID: PMC2079024  PMID: 13182227

Full text

PDF
395

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. HYNES M. Dispatch of specimens. Br Med J. 1953 Oct 17;2(4841):876–878. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4841.876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. KROGER E. Zur Bakterienausscheidung bei Typhus-Paratyphus-Keimträgern. Arch Hyg Bakteriol. 1951;135(3):215–221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. MOFFETT M., YOUNG J. L., STUART R. D. Centralized gonococcus culture for dispersed clinics; the value of a new transport medium for gonococci and trichomonas. Br Med J. 1948 Aug 28;2(4573):421–424. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4573.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. SHAUGHNESSY H. J., FRIEWER F., SNYDER A. Comparative efficiency of rectal swabs and fecal specimens in detecting typhoid and Salmonella cases and carriers. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1948 May;38(5 Pt 1):670–675. doi: 10.2105/ajph.38.5_pt_1.670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. WRIGHT J., RODEN A. T. Escherichia coli O 55 B 5 infection in a gastroenteritis ward; epidemiological applications of H antigen type determinations. Am J Hyg. 1953 Sep;58(2):133–147. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a119595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES