Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1990 Jun;172(6):3388–3399. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.6.3388-3399.1990

Mutations that affect control of the methylesterase activity of CheB, a component of the chemotaxis adaptation system in Escherichia coli.

R C Stewart 1, A F Roth 1, F W Dahlquist 1
PMCID: PMC209150  PMID: 2188960

Abstract

Sensory adaptation by the chemotaxis system of Escherichia coli requires adjustments of the extent of methyl esterification of the chemotaxis receptor proteins. One mechanism utilized by E. coli to make such adjustments is to control the activity of CheB, the enzyme responsible for removing receptor methyl ester groups. Previous work has established the existence of a multicomponent signal transduction pathway that enables the chemotaxis receptor proteins to control the methylesterase activity in response to chemotactic stimuli. We isolated and characterized CheB mutants that do not respond normally to this control mechanism. In intact cells these CheB variants could not be activated in response to negative chemotaxis stimuli. Further characterization indicated that these CheB variants could not be phosphorylated by the chemotaxis protein kinase CheA. Disruption of the mechanism responsible for regulating methylesterase activity was also observed in cells carrying chromosomal deletions of either cheA or cheW as well as in cells expressing mutant versions of CheA that lacked kinase activity. These results provide further support for recent proposals that activation of the methylesterase activity of CheB involves phosphorylation of CheB by CheA. Furthermore, our findings suggest that CheW plays an essential role in enabling the chemotaxis receptor proteins to control the methylesterase activity, possibly by controlling the CheA-CheB phosphotransfer reaction.

Full text

PDF
3390

Images in this article

3394Image
on p.3394

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berg H. C., Tedesco P. M. Transient response to chemotactic stimuli in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Aug;72(8):3235–3239. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.8.3235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Borkovich K. A., Kaplan N., Hess J. F., Simon M. I. Transmembrane signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis involves ligand-dependent activation of phosphate group transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Feb;86(4):1208–1212. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.4.1208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bruck C., Portetelle D., Glineur C., Bollen A. One-step purification of mouse monoclonal antibodies from ascitic fluid by DEAE Affi-Gel blue chromatography. J Immunol Methods. 1982 Sep 30;53(3):313–319. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(82)90178-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chelsky D., Gutterson N. I., Koshland D. E., Jr A diffusion assay for detection and quantitation of methyl-esterified proteins on polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem. 1984 Aug 15;141(1):143–148. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(84)90437-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Conley M. P., Wolfe A. J., Blair D. F., Berg H. C. Both CheA and CheW are required for reconstitution of chemotactic signaling in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1989 Sep;171(9):5190–5193. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.9.5190-5193.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goy M. F., Springer M. S., Adler J. Failure of sensory adaptation in bacterial mutants that are defective in a protein methylation reaction. Cell. 1978 Dec;15(4):1231–1240. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90049-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goy M. F., Springer M. S., Adler J. Sensory transduction in Escherichia coli: role of a protein methylation reaction in sensory adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Nov;74(11):4964–4968. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.11.4964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hazelbauer G. L., Park C., Nowlin D. M. Adaptational "crosstalk" and the crucial role of methylation in chemotactic migration by Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Mar;86(5):1448–1452. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.5.1448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hess J. F., Bourret R. B., Simon M. I. Histidine phosphorylation and phosphoryl group transfer in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature. 1988 Nov 10;336(6195):139–143. doi: 10.1038/336139a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hess J. F., Oosawa K., Kaplan N., Simon M. I. Phosphorylation of three proteins in the signaling pathway of bacterial chemotaxis. Cell. 1988 Apr 8;53(1):79–87. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90489-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hess J. F., Oosawa K., Matsumura P., Simon M. I. Protein phosphorylation is involved in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Nov;84(21):7609–7613. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.21.7609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Igo M. M., Ninfa A. J., Silhavy T. J. A bacterial environmental sensor that functions as a protein kinase and stimulates transcriptional activation. Genes Dev. 1989 May;3(5):598–605. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.5.598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kehry M. R., Doak T. G., Dahlquist F. W. Sensory adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis: regulation of demethylation. J Bacteriol. 1985 Sep;163(3):983–990. doi: 10.1128/jb.163.3.983-990.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kehry M. R., Doak T. G., Dahlquist F. W. Stimulus-induced changes in methylesterase activity during chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1984 Oct 10;259(19):11828–11835. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kofoid E. C., Parkinson J. S. Transmitter and receiver modules in bacterial signaling proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jul;85(14):4981–4985. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.14.4981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Koop A. H., Hartley M. E., Bourgeois S. A low-copy-number vector utilizing beta-galactosidase for the analysis of gene control elements. Gene. 1987;52(2-3):245–256. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90051-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kunkel T. A. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jan;82(2):488–492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.2.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lupas A., Stock J. Phosphorylation of an N-terminal regulatory domain activates the CheB methylesterase in bacterial chemotaxis. J Biol Chem. 1989 Oct 15;264(29):17337–17342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Macnab R. M., Koshland D. E., Jr The gradient-sensing mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Sep;69(9):2509–2512. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.9.2509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mutoh N., Oosawa K., Simon M. I. Characterization of Escherichia coli chemotaxis receptor mutants with null phenotypes. J Bacteriol. 1986 Sep;167(3):992–998. doi: 10.1128/jb.167.3.992-998.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mutoh N., Simon M. I. Nucleotide sequence corresponding to five chemotaxis genes in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1986 Jan;165(1):161–166. doi: 10.1128/jb.165.1.161-166.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ninfa A. J., Magasanik B. Covalent modification of the glnG product, NRI, by the glnL product, NRII, regulates the transcription of the glnALG operon in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Aug;83(16):5909–5913. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.16.5909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ninfa A. J., Reitzer L. J., Magasanik B. Initiation of transcription at the bacterial glnAp2 promoter by purified E. coli components is facilitated by enhancers. Cell. 1987 Sep 25;50(7):1039–1046. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90170-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nixon B. T., Ronson C. W., Ausubel F. M. Two-component regulatory systems responsive to environmental stimuli share strongly conserved domains with the nitrogen assimilation regulatory genes ntrB and ntrC. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Oct;83(20):7850–7854. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.20.7850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Oosawa K., Hess J. F., Simon M. I. Mutants defective in bacterial chemotaxis show modified protein phosphorylation. Cell. 1988 Apr 8;53(1):89–96. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90490-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Parkinson J. S., Parker S. R., Talbert P. B., Houts S. E. Interactions between chemotaxis genes and flagellar genes in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jul;155(1):265–274. doi: 10.1128/jb.155.1.265-274.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Parkinson J. S. Protein phosphorylation in bacterial chemotaxis. Cell. 1988 Apr 8;53(1):1–2. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90478-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Parkinson J. S., Revello P. T. Sensory adaptation mutants of E. coli. Cell. 1978 Dec;15(4):1221–1230. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90048-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Parkinson J. S. cheA, cheB, and cheC genes of Escherichia coli and their role in chemotaxis. J Bacteriol. 1976 May;126(2):758–770. doi: 10.1128/jb.126.2.758-770.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rollins C., Dahlquist F. W. The methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins of E. coli: a repellent-stimulated, covalent modification, distinct from methylation. Cell. 1981 Aug;25(2):333–340. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90051-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ronson C. W., Nixon B. T., Ausubel F. M. Conserved domains in bacterial regulatory proteins that respond to environmental stimuli. Cell. 1987 Jun 5;49(5):579–581. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90530-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Russell C. B., Dahlquist F. W. Exchange of chromosomal and plasmid alleles in Escherichia coli by selection for loss of a dominant antibiotic sensitivity marker. J Bacteriol. 1989 May;171(5):2614–2618. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.5.2614-2618.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Russell C. B., Thaler D. S., Dahlquist F. W. Chromosomal transformation of Escherichia coli recD strains with linearized plasmids. J Bacteriol. 1989 May;171(5):2609–2613. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.5.2609-2613.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sanger F., Nicklen S., Coulson A. R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5463–5467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Scouten W. H. A survey of enzyme coupling techniques. Methods Enzymol. 1987;135:30–65. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)35063-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Segall J. E., Manson M. D., Berg H. C. Signal processing times in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature. 1982 Apr 29;296(5860):855–857. doi: 10.1038/296855a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Simms S. A., Keane M. G., Stock J. Multiple forms of the CheB methylesterase in bacterial chemosensing. J Biol Chem. 1985 Aug 25;260(18):10161–10168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Springer M. S., Zanolari B. Sensory transduction in Escherichia coli: regulation of the demethylation rate by the CheA protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Aug;81(16):5061–5065. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.16.5061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Springer W. R., Koshland D. E., Jr Identification of a protein methyltransferase as the cheR gene product in the bacterial sensing system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Feb;74(2):533–537. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.2.533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Spudich J. L., Koshland D. E., Jr Quantitation of the sensory response in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Feb;72(2):710–713. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.2.710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Stewart R. C., Dahlquist F. W. N-terminal half of CheB is involved in methylesterase response to negative chemotactic stimuli in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1988 Dec;170(12):5728–5738. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.12.5728-5738.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Stewart R. C., Russell C. B., Roth A. F., Dahlquist F. W. Interaction of CheB with chemotaxis signal transduction components in Escherichia coli: modulation of the methylesterase activity and effects on cell swimming behavior. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1988;53(Pt 1):27–40. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1988.053.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Stock A. M., Wylie D. C., Mottonen J. M., Lupas A. N., Ninfa E. G., Ninfa A. J., Schutt C. E., Stock J. B. Phosphoproteins involved in bacterial signal transduction. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1988;53(Pt 1):49–57. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1988.053.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Stock A., Chen T., Welsh D., Stock J. CheA protein, a central regulator of bacterial chemotaxis, belongs to a family of proteins that control gene expression in response to changing environmental conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Mar;85(5):1403–1407. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.5.1403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Stock A., Koshland D. E., Jr, Stock J. Homologies between the Salmonella typhimurium CheY protein and proteins involved in the regulation of chemotaxis, membrane protein synthesis, and sporulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Dec;82(23):7989–7993. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.23.7989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Stock J. B., Koshland D. E., Jr A protein methylesterase involved in bacterial sensing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Aug;75(8):3659–3663. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.8.3659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Toews M. L., Goy M. F., Springer M. S., Adler J. Attractants and repellents control demethylation of methylated chemotaxis proteins in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Nov;76(11):5544–5548. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.11.5544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tsang N., Macnab R., Koshland D. E., Jr Common mechanism for repellents and attractants in bacterial chemotaxis. Science. 1973 Jul 6;181(4094):60–63. doi: 10.1126/science.181.4094.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Weis R. M., Koshland D. E., Jr Reversible receptor methylation is essential for normal chemotaxis of Escherichia coli in gradients of aspartic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jan;85(1):83–87. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.1.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Winans S. C., Ebert P. R., Stachel S. E., Gordon M. P., Nester E. W. A gene essential for Agrobacterium virulence is homologous to a family of positive regulatory loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Nov;83(21):8278–8282. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.21.8278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wittenberg C., Reed S. I. Control of the yeast cell cycle is associated with assembly/disassembly of the Cdc28 protein kinase complex. Cell. 1988 Sep 23;54(7):1061–1072. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90121-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wolfe A. J., Conley M. P., Kramer T. J., Berg H. C. Reconstitution of signaling in bacterial chemotaxis. J Bacteriol. 1987 May;169(5):1878–1885. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.5.1878-1885.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES