Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1987 Nov 1;105(5):2053–2067. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.5.2053

The inner centromere protein (INCENP) antigens: movement from inner centromere to midbody during mitosis

PMCID: PMC2114862  PMID: 3316246

Abstract

We describe a novel set of polypeptide antigens that shows a dramatic change in structural localization during mitosis. Through metaphase these antigens define a new chromosomal substructure that is located between the sister chromatids. Because the antigens are concentrated in the pericentromeric region, we have provisionally termed them the INCENPs (inner centromere proteins). The INCENPs (two polypeptides of 155 and 135 kD) were identified with a monoclonal antibody that was raised against the bulk proteins of the mitotic chromosome scaffold fraction. These two polypeptides are the most tightly bound chromosomal proteins known. When scaffolds are prepared, 100% of the detectable INCENPs remain scaffold associated. We were therefore unprepared for the fate of the INCENPs at anaphase. As the sister chromatids separate, the INCENPs dissociate fully from them, remaining behind at the metaphase plate as the chromatids migrate to the spindle poles. During anaphase the INCENPs are found on coarse fibers in the central spindle, and also in close apposition to the cell membrane in the region of the forming contractile ring. During telophase, the INCENPs gradually become focused onto the forming midbody, together with which they are ultimately discarded. Several possible in vivo roles for the INCENPs are suggested by these data: regulation of sister chromatid pairing, stabilization of the plane of cleavage, and separation of spindle poles at anaphase.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (6.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adolphs K. W., Cheng S. M., Paulson J. R., Laemmli U. K. Isolation of a protein scaffold from mitotic HeLa cell chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Nov;74(11):4937–4941. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.11.4937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blackburn E. H. The molecular structure of centromeres and telomeres. Annu Rev Biochem. 1984;53:163–194. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.53.070184.001115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brenner S., Pepper D., Berns M. W., Tan E., Brinkley B. R. Kinetochore structure, duplication, and distribution in mammalian cells: analysis by human autoantibodies from scleroderma patients. J Cell Biol. 1981 Oct;91(1):95–102. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.1.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carlson J. G. Mitotic Behavior of Induced Chromosomal Fragments Lacking Spindle Attachments in the Neuroblasts of the Grasshopper. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1938 Nov;24(11):500–507. doi: 10.1073/pnas.24.11.500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clarke L., Carbon J. The structure and function of yeast centromeres. Annu Rev Genet. 1985;19:29–55. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.19.120185.000333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dani G. M., Zakian V. A. Mitotic and meiotic stability of linear plasmids in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jun;80(11):3406–3410. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.11.3406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davis F. M., Tsao T. Y., Fowler S. K., Rao P. N. Monoclonal antibodies to mitotic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 May;80(10):2926–2930. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.10.2926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davis L. I., Blobel G. Identification and characterization of a nuclear pore complex protein. Cell. 1986 Jun 6;45(5):699–709. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90784-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. DiNardo S., Voelkel K., Sternglanz R. DNA topoisomerase II mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: topoisomerase II is required for segregation of daughter molecules at the termination of DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 May;81(9):2616–2620. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.9.2616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Earnshaw W. C., Halligan B., Cooke C. A., Heck M. M., Liu L. F. Topoisomerase II is a structural component of mitotic chromosome scaffolds. J Cell Biol. 1985 May;100(5):1706–1715. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.5.1706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Earnshaw W. C., Halligan N., Cooke C., Rothfield N. The kinetochore is part of the metaphase chromosome scaffold. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jan;98(1):352–357. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.1.352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Earnshaw W. C., Heck M. M. Localization of topoisomerase II in mitotic chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 1985 May;100(5):1716–1725. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.5.1716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Earnshaw W. C., Laemmli U. K. Architecture of metaphase chromosomes and chromosome scaffolds. J Cell Biol. 1983 Jan;96(1):84–93. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.1.84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Earnshaw W. C., Migeon B. R. Three related centromere proteins are absent from the inactive centromere of a stable isodicentric chromosome. Chromosoma. 1985;92(4):290–296. doi: 10.1007/BF00329812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Earnshaw W. C., Rothfield N. Identification of a family of human centromere proteins using autoimmune sera from patients with scleroderma. Chromosoma. 1985;91(3-4):313–321. doi: 10.1007/BF00328227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Euteneuer U., McIntosh J. R. Structural polarity of kinetochore microtubules in PtK1 cells. J Cell Biol. 1981 May;89(2):338–345. doi: 10.1083/jcb.89.2.338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gorbsky G. J., Sammak P. J., Borisy G. G. Chromosomes move poleward in anaphase along stationary microtubules that coordinately disassemble from their kinetochore ends. J Cell Biol. 1987 Jan;104(1):9–18. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Guldner H. H., Lakomek H. J., Bautz F. A. Human anti-centromere sera recognise a 19.5 kD non-histone chromosomal protein from HeLa cells. Clin Exp Immunol. 1984 Oct;58(1):13–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Heck M. M., Earnshaw W. C. Topoisomerase II: A specific marker for cell proliferation. J Cell Biol. 1986 Dec;103(6 Pt 2):2569–2581. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.6.2569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Holm C., Goto T., Wang J. C., Botstein D. DNA topoisomerase II is required at the time of mitosis in yeast. Cell. 1985 Jun;41(2):553–563. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80028-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Holt G. D., Hart G. W. The subcellular distribution of terminal N-acetylglucosamine moieties. Localization of a novel protein-saccharide linkage, O-linked GlcNAc. J Biol Chem. 1986 Jun 15;261(17):8049–8057. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kearney J. F., Radbruch A., Liesegang B., Rajewsky K. A new mouse myeloma cell line that has lost immunoglobulin expression but permits the construction of antibody-secreting hybrid cell lines. J Immunol. 1979 Oct;123(4):1548–1550. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kiehart D. P., Kaiser D. A., Pollard T. D. Monoclonal antibodies demonstrate limited structural homology between myosin isozymes from Acanthamoeba. J Cell Biol. 1984 Sep;99(3):1002–1014. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.3.1002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kirschner M., Mitchison T. Beyond self-assembly: from microtubules to morphogenesis. Cell. 1986 May 9;45(3):329–342. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90318-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. MOLE-BAJER J. Cine-micrographic analysis of C-mitosis in endosperm. Chromosoma. 1958;9(4):332–358. doi: 10.1007/BF02568085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mitchison T., Evans L., Schulze E., Kirschner M. Sites of microtubule assembly and disassembly in the mitotic spindle. Cell. 1986 May 23;45(4):515–527. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90283-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Moroi Y., Peebles C., Fritzler M. J., Steigerwald J., Tan E. M. Autoantibody to centromere (kinetochore) in scleroderma sera. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Mar;77(3):1627–1631. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.3.1627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Murray A. W., Szostak J. W. Construction of artificial chromosomes in yeast. Nature. 1983 Sep 15;305(5931):189–193. doi: 10.1038/305189a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nyman U., Hallman H., Hadlaczky G., Pettersson I., Sharp G., Ringertz N. R. Intranuclear localization of snRNP antigens. J Cell Biol. 1986 Jan;102(1):137–144. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.1.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Osborn M., Weber K. Immunofluorescence and immunocytochemical procedures with affinity purified antibodies: tubulin-containing structures. Methods Cell Biol. 1982;24:97–132. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60650-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ottaviano Y., Gerace L. Phosphorylation of the nuclear lamins during interphase and mitosis. J Biol Chem. 1985 Jan 10;260(1):624–632. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Paulson J. R., Laemmli U. K. The structure of histone-depleted metaphase chromosomes. Cell. 1977 Nov;12(3):817–828. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90280-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rappaport R. Cytokinesis in animal cells. Int Rev Cytol. 1971;31:169–213. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)60059-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rappaport R. Establishment and organization of the cleavage mechanism. Soc Gen Physiol Ser. 1975;30:287–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rieder C. L. The formation, structure, and composition of the mammalian kinetochore and kinetochore fiber. Int Rev Cytol. 1982;79:1–58. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61672-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sluder G. Role of spindle microtubules in the control of cell cycle timing. J Cell Biol. 1979 Mar;80(3):674–691. doi: 10.1083/jcb.80.3.674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Snow C. M., Senior A., Gerace L. Monoclonal antibodies identify a group of nuclear pore complex glycoproteins. J Cell Biol. 1987 May;104(5):1143–1156. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.5.1143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sundin O., Varshavsky A. Arrest of segregation leads to accumulation of highly intertwined catenated dimers: dissection of the final stages of SV40 DNA replication. Cell. 1981 Sep;25(3):659–669. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90173-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Telzer B. R., Haimo L. T. Decoration of spindle microtubules with Dynein: evidence for uniform polarity. J Cell Biol. 1981 May;89(2):373–378. doi: 10.1083/jcb.89.2.373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Uemura T., Tanagida M. Mitotic spindle pulls but fails to separate chromosomes in type II DNA topoisomerase mutants: uncoordinated mitosis. EMBO J. 1986 May;5(5):1003–1010. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04315.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Uemura T., Yanagida M. Isolation of type I and II DNA topoisomerase mutants from fission yeast: single and double mutants show different phenotypes in cell growth and chromatin organization. EMBO J. 1984 Aug;3(8):1737–1744. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02040.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Valdivia M. M., Brinkley B. R. Fractionation and initial characterization of the kinetochore from mammalian metaphase chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 1985 Sep;101(3):1124–1134. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.3.1124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. van Venrooij W. J., Stapel S. O., Houben H., Habets W. J., Kallenberg C. G., Penner E., van de Putte L. B. Scl-86, a marker antigen for diffuse scleroderma. J Clin Invest. 1985 Mar;75(3):1053–1060. doi: 10.1172/JCI111767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES