Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1989 Mar 1;108(3):931–937. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.3.931

Asymmetric behavior of severed microtubule ends after ultraviolet- microbeam irradiation of individual microtubules in vitro

PMCID: PMC2115382  PMID: 2921286

Abstract

The molecular basis of microtubule dynamic instability is controversial, but is thought to be related to a "GTP cap." A key prediction of the GTP cap model is that the proposed labile GDP-tubulin core will rapidly dissociate if the GTP-tubulin cap is lost. We have tested this prediction by using a UV microbeam to cut the ends from elongating microtubules. Phosphocellulose-purified tubulin was assembled onto the plus and minus ends of sea urchin flagellar axoneme fragments at 21-22 degrees C. The assembly dynamics of individual microtubules were recorded in real time using video microscopy. When the tip of an elongating plus end microtubule was cut off, the severed plus end microtubule always rapidly shortened back to the axoneme at the normal plus end rate. However, when the distal tip of an elongating minus end microtubule was cut off, no rapid shortening occurred. Instead, the severed minus end resumed elongation at the normal minus end rate. Our results show that some form of "stabilizing cap," possibly a GTP cap, governs the transition (catastrophe) from elongation to rapid shortening at the plus end. At the minus end, a simple GTP cap is not sufficient to explain the observed behavior unless UV induces immediate recapping of minus, but not plus, ends. Another possibility is that a second step, perhaps a structural transformation, is required in addition to GTP cap loss for rapid shortening to occur. This transformation would be favored at plus, but not minus ends, to account for the asymmetric behavior of the ends.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bell C. W., Fraser C., Sale W. S., Tang W. J., Gibbons I. R. Preparation and purification of dynein. Methods Cell Biol. 1982;24:373–397. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60666-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Caplow M., Reid R. Directed elongation model for microtubule GTP hydrolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 May;82(10):3267–3271. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.10.3267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caplow M., Shanks J., Brylawski B. P. Concerning the location of the GTP hydrolysis site on microtubules. Can J Biochem Cell Biol. 1985 Jun;63(6):422–429. doi: 10.1139/o85-061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carlier M. F., Didry D., Melki R., Chabre M., Pantaloni D. Stabilization of microtubules by inorganic phosphate and its structural analogues, the fluoride complexes of aluminum and beryllium. Biochemistry. 1988 May 17;27(10):3555–3559. doi: 10.1021/bi00410a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carlier M. F., Didry D., Pantaloni D. Microtubule elongation and guanosine 5'-triphosphate hydrolysis. Role of guanine nucleotides in microtubule dynamics. Biochemistry. 1987 Jul 14;26(14):4428–4437. doi: 10.1021/bi00388a036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carlier M. F., Hill T. L., Chen Y. Interference of GTP hydrolysis in the mechanism of microtubule assembly: an experimental study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Feb;81(3):771–775. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.3.771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carlier M. F., Pantaloni D. Kinetic analysis of guanosine 5'-triphosphate hydrolysis associated with tubulin polymerization. Biochemistry. 1981 Mar 31;20(7):1918–1924. doi: 10.1021/bi00510a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cassimeris L. U., Wadsworth P., Salmon E. D. Dynamics of microtubule depolymerization in monocytes. J Cell Biol. 1986 Jun;102(6):2023–2032. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.6.2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cassimeris L. U., Walker R. A., Pryer N. K., Salmon E. D. Dynamic instability of microtubules. Bioessays. 1987 Oct;7(4):149–154. doi: 10.1002/bies.950070403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cassimeris L., Pryer N. K., Salmon E. D. Real-time observations of microtubule dynamic instability in living cells. J Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;107(6 Pt 1):2223–2231. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.6.2223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen Y. D., Hill T. L. Monte Carlo study of the GTP cap in a five-start helix model of a microtubule. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Feb;82(4):1131–1135. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.4.1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. David-Pfeuty T., Erickson H. P., Pantaloni D. Guanosinetriphosphatase activity of tubulin associated with microtubule assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5372–5376. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. FORER A. LOCAL REDUCTION OF SPINDLE FIBER BIREFRINGENCE IN LIVING NEPHROTOMA SUTURALIS (LOEW) SPERMATOCYTES INDUCED BY ULTRAVIOLET MICROBEAM IRRADIATION. J Cell Biol. 1965 Apr;25:SUPPL–SUPPL117. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.1.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Forer A. Does actin produce the force that moves a chromosome to the pole during anaphase? Can J Biochem Cell Biol. 1985 Jun;63(6):585–598. doi: 10.1139/o85-077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hamel E., Batra J. K., Huang A. B., Lin C. M. Effects of pH on tubulin-nucleotide interactions. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1986 Mar;245(2):316–330. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(86)90222-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hesse J., Maruta H., Isenberg G. Monoclonal antibodies localize the exchangeable GTP-binding site in beta- and not alpha-tubulins. FEBS Lett. 1985 Jan 1;179(1):91–95. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(85)80198-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hill T. L., Chen Y. Phase changes at the end of a microtubule with a GTP cap. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Sep;81(18):5772–5776. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.18.5772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hill T. L. Introductory analysis of the GTP-cap phase-change kinetics at the end of a microtubule. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Nov;81(21):6728–6732. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.21.6728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Horio T., Hotani H. Visualization of the dynamic instability of individual microtubules by dark-field microscopy. Nature. 1986 Jun 5;321(6070):605–607. doi: 10.1038/321605a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kirchner K., Mandelkow E. M. Tubulin domains responsible for assembly of dimers and protofilaments. EMBO J. 1985 Sep;4(9):2397–2402. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb03945.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kirschner M. W., Mitchison T. Microtubule dynamics. Nature. 1986 Dec 18;324(6098):621–621. doi: 10.1038/324621a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kobayashi T. Dephosphorylation of tubulin-bound guanosine triphosphate during microtubule assembly. J Biochem. 1975 Jun;77(6):1193–1197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kobayashi T. Nucleotides bound to brain tubulin and reconstituted microtubules. J Biochem. 1974 Jul;76(1):201–204. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a130546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Leslie R. J., Pickett-Heaps J. D. Spindle microtubule dynamics following ultraviolet-microbeam irradiations of mitotic diatoms. Cell. 1984 Mar;36(3):717–727. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90352-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lutz D. A., Inoué S. Techniques for observing living gametes and embryos. Methods Cell Biol. 1986;27:89–110. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60344-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Margolis R. L., Wilson L., Keifer B. I. Mitotic mechanism based on intrinsic microtubule behaviour. Nature. 1978 Mar 30;272(5652):450–452. doi: 10.1038/272450a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nath J. P., Eagle G. R., Himes R. H. Direct photoaffinity labeling of tubulin with guanosine 5'-triphosphate. Biochemistry. 1985 Mar 12;24(6):1555–1560. doi: 10.1021/bi00327a040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. O'Brien E. T., Voter W. A., Erickson H. P. GTP hydrolysis during microtubule assembly. Biochemistry. 1987 Jun 30;26(13):4148–4156. doi: 10.1021/bi00387a061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sammak P. J., Borisy G. G. Direct observation of microtubule dynamics in living cells. Nature. 1988 Apr 21;332(6166):724–726. doi: 10.1038/332724a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sammak P. J., Gorbsky G. J., Borisy G. G. Microtubule dynamics in vivo: a test of mechanisms of turnover. J Cell Biol. 1987 Mar;104(3):395–405. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.3.395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schilstra M. J., Martin S. R., Bayley P. M. On the relationship between nucleotide hydrolysis and microtubule assembly: studies with a GTP-regenerating system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1987 Sep 15;147(2):588–595. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(87)90971-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schulze E., Kirschner M. Microtubule dynamics in interphase cells. J Cell Biol. 1986 Mar;102(3):1020–1031. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.3.1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Schulze E., Kirschner M. New features of microtubule behaviour observed in vivo. Nature. 1988 Jul 28;334(6180):356–359. doi: 10.1038/334356a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tao W., Walter R. J., Berns M. W. Laser-transected microtubules exhibit individuality of regrowth, however most free new ends of the microtubules are stable. J Cell Biol. 1988 Sep;107(3):1025–1035. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.3.1025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Voter W. A., Erickson H. P. The kinetics of microtubule assembly. Evidence for a two-stage nucleation mechanism. J Biol Chem. 1984 Aug 25;259(16):10430–10438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Walker R. A., O'Brien E. T., Pryer N. K., Soboeiro M. F., Voter W. A., Erickson H. P., Salmon E. D. Dynamic instability of individual microtubules analyzed by video light microscopy: rate constants and transition frequencies. J Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;107(4):1437–1448. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Weisenberg R. C., Borisy G. G., Taylor E. W. The colchicine-binding protein of mammalian brain and its relation to microtubules. Biochemistry. 1968 Dec;7(12):4466–4479. doi: 10.1021/bi00852a043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Weisenberg R. C., Deery W. J., Dickinson P. J. Tubulin-nucleotide interactions during the polymerization and depolymerization of microtubules. Biochemistry. 1976 Sep 21;15(19):4248–4254. doi: 10.1021/bi00664a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wilson P. J., Forer A. Ultraviolet microbeam irradiation of chromosomal spindle fibres shears microtubules and permits study of the new free ends in vivo. J Cell Sci. 1988 Dec;91(Pt 4):455–468. doi: 10.1242/jcs.91.4.455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES