Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1993 Sep 2;122(6):1295–1300. doi: 10.1083/jcb.122.6.1295

Synchrony of cell spreading and contraction force as phagocytes engulf large pathogens

PMCID: PMC2119861  PMID: 8376464

Abstract

A simple micromechanical method has been used to directly measure the force of contraction in single mammalian phagocytes (blood granulocytes) during engulfment of large yeast pathogens. Both the time course of cell spreading over the yeast particle and increase in cell body contractile force were quantitated at three temperatures in the range of 23-35 degrees C. The surprising feature of the phagocyte response was that engulfment and cell body contraction occurred in a serial sequence: i.e., the phagocyte spread rapidly over the particle at a steady rate with no detectable cell body contraction; when spreading stopped, contraction force in the cell body then rose steadily to a plateau level that remained stationary until the next sequence of spreading and contraction. Both spreading and contraction exhibited abrupt start/stop kinetics. Also impressive, the cell contraction force stimulated by phagocytosis was quite large (approximately 10(-8) N)-two orders of magnitude larger than the force necessary to deform passive phagocytes to the same extent. If distributed uniformly over the cell cross section, the contraction force is equivalent to an average contractile stress of approximately 10(3) N/m2 (0.01 Atm). These physical measurements in situ set critical requirements for the mechanism of force generation in granulocytes, imply that a major increase in network cross-linking accompanies build- up in contractile force and that subsequent network dissolution is necessary for locomotion.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abercrombie M., Heaysman J. E., Pegrum S. M. The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. 3. Movements of particles on the dorsal surface of the leading lamella. Exp Cell Res. 1970 Oct;62(2):389–398. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90570-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abercrombie M., Heaysman J. E., Pegrum S. M. The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. I. Movements of the leading edge. Exp Cell Res. 1970 Mar;59(3):393–398. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90646-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Abercrombie M., Heaysman J. E., Pegrum S. M. The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. II. "RRuffling". Exp Cell Res. 1970 Jun;60(3):437–444. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90537-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen W. T. Induction of spreading during fibroblast movement. J Cell Biol. 1979 Jun;81(3):684–691. doi: 10.1083/jcb.81.3.684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Evans E. Kinetics of granulocyte phagocytosis: rate limited by cytoplasmic viscosity and constrained by cell size. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1989;14(4):544–551. doi: 10.1002/cm.970140411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Evans E. New physical concepts for cell amoeboid motion. Biophys J. 1993 Apr;64(4):1306–1322. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81497-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Evans E., Yeung A. Apparent viscosity and cortical tension of blood granulocytes determined by micropipet aspiration. Biophys J. 1989 Jul;56(1):151–160. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82660-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HUXLEY A. F. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1957;7:255–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harris A. K., Wild P., Stopak D. Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. Science. 1980 Apr 11;208(4440):177–179. doi: 10.1126/science.6987736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ishijima A., Doi T., Sakurada K., Yanagida T. Sub-piconewton force fluctuations of actomyosin in vitro. Nature. 1991 Jul 25;352(6333):301–306. doi: 10.1038/352301a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Janson L. W., Kolega J., Taylor D. L. Modulation of contraction by gelation/solation in a reconstituted motile model. J Cell Biol. 1991 Sep;114(5):1005–1015. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.5.1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kishino A., Yanagida T. Force measurements by micromanipulation of a single actin filament by glass needles. Nature. 1988 Jul 7;334(6177):74–76. doi: 10.1038/334074a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kron S. J., Spudich J. A. Fluorescent actin filaments move on myosin fixed to a glass surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Sep;83(17):6272–6276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.17.6272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee J., Gustafsson M., Magnusson K. E., Jacobson K. The direction of membrane lipid flow in locomoting polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Science. 1990 Mar 9;247(4947):1229–1233. doi: 10.1126/science.2315695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MacFarlane G. D., Herzberg M. C. Concurrent estimation of the kinetics of adhesion and ingestion of Staphylococcus aureus by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs). J Immunol Methods. 1984 Jan 20;66(1):35–49. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(84)90245-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pollard T. D., Cooper J. A. Actin and actin-binding proteins. A critical evaluation of mechanisms and functions. Annu Rev Biochem. 1986;55:987–1035. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.55.070186.005011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rabinovitch M. The dissociation of the attachment and ingestion phases of phagocytosis by macrophages. Exp Cell Res. 1967 Apr;46(1):19–28. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(67)90405-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Southwick F. S., Stossel T. P. Contractile proteins in leukocyte function. Semin Hematol. 1983 Oct;20(4):305–321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Stendahl O. I., Stossel T. P. Actin-binding protein amplifies actomyosin contraction, and gelsolin confers calcium control on the direction of contraction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1980 Jan 29;92(2):675–681. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(80)90386-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stossel T. P., Hartwig J. H., Yin H. L., Stendahl O. The motor of amoeboid leucocytes. Biochem Soc Symp. 1980;45:51–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stossel T. P. The structure of cortical cytoplasm. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982 Nov 4;299(1095):275–289. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1982.0132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Taylor D. L., Fechheimer M. Cytoplasmic structure and contractility: the solation--contraction coupling hypothesis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982 Nov 4;299(1095):185–197. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1982.0125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Theriot J. A., Mitchison T. J. Actin microfilament dynamics in locomoting cells. Nature. 1991 Jul 11;352(6331):126–131. doi: 10.1038/352126a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES