Skip to main content
The Journal of Hygiene logoLink to The Journal of Hygiene
. 1977 Jun;78(3):325. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400056229

Tuberculin testing in hospital personnel.

M P Holley, C A Bartzokas
PMCID: PMC2129874  PMID: 266537

Abstract

Tuberculin testing of 176 personnel in a Liverpool hospital showed a total incidence of 68% negative reactors. This remarkably high percentage was similar for each of the various groups of workers tested. We did not find the Tine test to be a satisfactory method of screening for tuberculin sensitivity because 30% were doubtful reactors. In these, further tuberculin testing by the Mantoux reagent was always positive.

Full text

PDF
326

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ARTHUR A. B., WHITE J. E. AN EVALUATION OF A DISPOSABLE TUBERCULIN TEST IN CHILDREN. Tubercle. 1965 Jun;46:126–130. doi: 10.1016/s0041-3879(65)80055-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Atuk N. O., Hunt E. H. Serial tuberculin testing and isoniazid therapy in general hospital employees. JAMA. 1971 Dec 20;218(12):1795–1798. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. NOBLE J., BEHNKE R. H. A COMPARISON OF THE PPD WITH THE TUBERCULIN TINE TEST. J Indiana State Med Assoc. 1965 May;58:423–428. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rosenthal S. R., Nikurs L., Yorky E., Williams W. Tuberculin, tine test in infection and disease. South Med J. 1967 Dec;60(12):1336–1341. doi: 10.1097/00007611-196712000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Young N. Tuberculin skin testing with specific reference to the Tine test. Del Med J. 1967 Sep;39(9):235–passim. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Hygiene are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES