Skip to main content
The Journal of Hygiene logoLink to The Journal of Hygiene
. 1972 Jun;70(2):343–351. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400022397

Specificity of early protective responses induced by pseudomonas vaccines

R J Jones
PMCID: PMC2130047  PMID: 4503873

Abstract

A single inoculation of pseudomonas vaccine protected mice against a 1 LD 100 challenge by nine different serotypes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 4 days after vaccination. Three inoculations of the same vaccine, given on consecutive days, protected mice for a longer time, against challenge by a wide range of Ps. aeruginosa serotypes, than the single inoculation of vaccine. The amount of vaccine inoculated only marginally influenced the non-specific response. F1 vaccines from eight serotypes of Ps. aeruginosa each induced protection against a different range of serotypes.

Full text

PDF
343

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alexander J. W., Fisher M. W., MacMillan B. G., Altemeier W. A. Prevention of invasive pseudomonas infection in burns with a new vaccine. Arch Surg. 1969 Aug;99(2):249–256. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1969.01340140121018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carney S. A., Jones R. J. Biological and immunochemical properties of culture filtrates of virulent and avirulent strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Br J Exp Pathol. 1968 Oct;49(5):395–410. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cason J. S., Lowbury E. J. Mortality and infection in extensively burned patients treated with silver-nitrate compresses. Lancet. 1968 Mar 30;1(7544):651–654. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)92095-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fisher M. W., Devlin H. B., Gnabasik F. J. New immunotype schema for Pseudomonas aeruginosa based on protective antigens. J Bacteriol. 1969 May;98(2):835–836. doi: 10.1128/jb.98.2.835-836.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jones R. J. Detoxification of an immunogenic fraction from a culture filtrate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Hyg (Lond) 1969 Jun;67(2):241–247. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400041644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jones R. J. Early protection by vaccines in burns. Br J Exp Pathol. 1971 Feb;52(1):100–109. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jones R. J., Jackson D. M., Lowbury E. J. Antiserum and antibiotic in the prophylaxis of burns against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Br J Plast Surg. 1966 Jan;19(1):43–57. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(66)80007-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. KEFALIDES N. A., ARANA J. A., BAZAN A., VELARDE N., ROSENTHAL S. M. EVALUATION OF ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS AND GAMMA-GLOBULIN, PLASMA, ALBUMIN AND SALINE-SOLUTION THERAPY IN SEVERE BURNS. BACTERIOLOGIC AND IMMUNOLOGIC STUDIES. Ann Surg. 1964 Apr;159:496–506. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196404000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lindberg R. B., Moncrief J. A., Switzer W. E., Order S. E., Mills W., Jr The successful control of burn wound sepsis. J Trauma. 1965 Sep;5(5):601–616. doi: 10.1097/00005373-196509000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Markley K., Smallman E. Protection by vaccination against Pseudomonas infection after thermal injury. J Bacteriol. 1968 Oct;96(4):867–874. doi: 10.1128/jb.96.4.867-874.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Hygiene are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES