Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Hygiene logoLink to The Journal of Hygiene
. 1967 Dec;65(4):457–466. doi: 10.1017/s002217240004599x

Immunization of man with salmonella vaccine and tetanus-diphtheria vaccine. Dose-response relationship, secondary response, and competition of antigens.

H A Clasener
PMCID: PMC2130398  PMID: 5235253

Full text

PDF
460

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ASHCROFT M. T., RITCHIE J. M., NICHOLSON C. C. CONTROLLED FIELD TRIAL IN BRITISH GUIANA SCHOOL CHILDREN OF HEAT-KILLED-PHENOLIZED AND ACETONE-KILLED LYOPHILIZED TYPHOID VACCINES. Am J Hyg. 1964 Mar;79:196–206. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BARR M., LLEWELLYN-JONES M. Some factors influencing the response of animals to immunisation with combined prophylactics. Br J Exp Pathol. 1953 Feb;34(1):12–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BAUER D. C., MATHIES M. J., STAVITSKY A. B. Sequences of synthesis of gamma-1 macroglobulin and gamma-2 globulin antibodies during primary and secondary responses to proteins, salmonella antigens, and phage. J Exp Med. 1963 Jun 1;117:889–907. doi: 10.1084/jem.117.6.889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clasener H. A. Immunization of man with typhoid and cholera vaccine. Agglutinating antibodies after intracutaneous and subcutaneous injection. J Hyg (Lond) 1967 Dec;65(4):449–456. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400045988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FECSIK A. I., BUTLER W. T., COONS A. H. STUDIES ON ANTIBODY PRODUCTION. XI. VARIATION IN THE SECONDARY RESPONSE AS A FUNCTION OF THE LENGTH OF THE INTERVAL BETWEEN TWO ANTIGENIC STIMULI. J Exp Med. 1964 Dec 1;120:1041–1049. doi: 10.1084/jem.120.6.1041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. SCHEIBEL I. A comparative study on intracutaneous and haemagglutination procedures for assaying diphtheria antitoxin, with special reference to the avidity of the antitoxin. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1956;39(6):455–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1956.tb05073.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. STAVITSKY A. B. Micromethods for the study of proteins and antibodies. I. Procedure and general applications of hemagglutination and hemagglutination-inhibition reactions with tannic acid and protein-treated red blood cells. J Immunol. 1954 May;72(5):360–367. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. STEVENS K. M. Some considerations of the antigen dose-antibody response relationship. J Immunol. 1956 Mar;76(3):187–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. SURJAN M., NYERGES G. Diphtheria antitoxin titration of human sera by haemagglutination. Z Immun exp ther. 1962 Dec;124:401–410. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. SURJAN M., NYERGES G. Haemagglutination procedure for the assay of tetanus antitoxin of children's sera. Z Immun exp ther. 1962 Dec;124:390–400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. TASMAN A., van RAMSHORST J., SMITH L. Determination of diphtheria and tetanus antitoxin with the aid of haemagglutination. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1960;26:413–429. doi: 10.1007/BF02539029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. UHR J. W., FINKELSTEIN M. S. Antibody formation. IV. Formation of rapidly and slowly sedimenting antibodies and immunological memory to bacteriophage phi-X 174. J Exp Med. 1963 Mar 1;117:457–477. doi: 10.1084/jem.117.3.457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Hygiene are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES